Rebuttal to Maddox's article re: 9/11

[coconut]

Maddox's last 20 or so articles have been pure nonsense and I'm sure he lost a lot of fans with this last one. Once a hardcore fan, I kind of gave up on him a few months ago.

Here's my rebuttal.

Any suggestions are welcome.

[Mark Gobell]

Coconut

Until I read your post I had not heard of Maddox and now since reading his hit piece on Dylan Avery and Loose Change I'm sure I don't want to.

One point:

Maddox's argument, if you can call it that, attempts to use the fact that Avery et al haven't been whacked, prooves that there was no 9/11 conspiracy.

If you apply this same logic to a known conspiracy that eventually fell apart; the Iran Contra Affair, then we would have had no trial of Oliver North would we, because in Maddox's world all witnesses would have been murdered before they could testify wouldn't they.