FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Steven E Jones WTC slideshow

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Pikey
Banned
Banned


Joined: 25 Jul 2005
Posts: 1491
Location: North Lancashire

PostPosted: Tue Sep 19, 2006 9:15 pm    Post subject: Steven E Jones WTC slideshow Reply with quote

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=24745#24745

Shills/Trolls/supporters of the Official Conspiracy theory (re: Kean commission report) what do you make of this independent scientific analysis?

_________________
Pikey

Peace, truth, respect and a Mason free society

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RaH-lGafwtE#
www.wholetruthcoalition.org
www.truthforum.co.uk
www.checktheevidence.com
www.newhorizonsstannes.com
www.tpuc.org
www.cpexposed.com
www.thebcgroup.org.uk
www.fmotl.com
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
aggle-rithm
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Aug 2006
Posts: 557

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:16 pm    Post subject: Re: Steven E Jones WTC slideshow Reply with quote

Pikey wrote:
http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?p=24745#24745

Shills/Trolls/supporters of the Official Conspiracy theory (re: Kean commission report) what do you make of this independent scientific analysis?


I mistakenly replied to this in the wrong area, where Pikey took me to task for using an ad hominem argument against the esteemed Dr. Jones. Here I will try to be more objective.

To answer your question, "what do I make of this":

1. At first glance, the presentation seems rather amatuerish to be the product of a college professor. Shockingly so, in fact. The use of multi-colored fonts, exclamation points, and rhetorical questions seems more worthy of a high school project than a high-level presentation from an academic.

2. The quotes from NIST and MIT are misleading. He quotes two experts that say the steel did not melt. What they are saying is that the structural collapse did not require the structural steel to completely melt, only to weaken. At this point, he is begging the question that the molten substance he has shown pictures of is structural steel. He has failed to demonstrate this, only presented it as one of four possibilities.

3. The basis of the whole theory is a false dichotomy. Dr. Jones apparently believes that if NIST's initial hypothesis of what the molten substance was is incorrect, then by default the building was brought down by thermate. I trust I don't need to explain why this is nonsense.

Well, enough for now. I've lost enough brain cells this morning.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Jay Ref
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 20 Jul 2006
Posts: 511

PostPosted: Wed Sep 20, 2006 1:37 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote



The above is a fine example of Stephen Jone's style of scholarship in a nutshell.

-z

_________________
"Knowledge is good"
-Emil Faber

"God in heaven. Here's the hard-headed, evidence-only freak who will not, like we CTers, indulge himself in self-inflating, utterly misconceived fantasies." -kbo234 (who is NOT a nazi) briefly makes sense
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Critics' Corner All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You cannot download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group