In case anyone wants to use or adapt it for any purpose...
================
Dear Ms Blackman,
Following several recent events, which are now just
beginning to affect the political landscape in Britain, I felt I should write to
you to advise you of the latest developments.
As I advised you in a previous letter, Christian Theologian
Professor David Ray Griffin was in London for a few days, centred on Sat 9th
September, when he addressed a crowd of over 600 people at Conway Hall. This
represented a significant step forward in raising the awareness of these issues
which now will redefine the whole domestic and geopolitical arena. David Shayler
also spoke at this event, to preface and offer a British perspective on some of
the issues.
Prof David Ray Griffin appeared on the BBC’s Heaven
and Earth show on Sunday 10th September to discuss the main
points of his recent book Christian Faith and the Truth Behind 9/11. In
the 7-minute interview, recorded in Amsterdam with Ed Sturton, Prof Griffin
discussed the controlled demolition and total
destruction (to pulverised dust) of WTC buildings 1, 2 and 7 – and the footage was shown to
illustrate his discussion. This interview was followed by a short panel
discussion which included David Shayler, Peter Hitchins and John Irvine, Dean of
Coventry. None of the guests were able to offer any specific evidence against
anything that David Ray Griffin or David Shayler said. Despite this, again, the
main BBC news covered none of this. This is therefore additional documentation
of the BBC’s complicity in covering up the real crimes on 9/11.
Also on Sunday, we held a day-long event at Brixton,
organised by several London members. About 10 or 15 people spoke about various
topics, including Former MI5 Officer Annie Machon as well as Calum Douglas, an
Engineering student from Oxford Brookes University, Media Company Director Tim
Sparke, Journalist and radio presenter Tony Gosling, David Shayler and former
Oil Industry Work Ian Crane. I was also asked to give 2 short presentations
about my own campaigning activities. Between 50 and 100 people attended the day.
Several bands played in the evening and Anti-Terror Police Officers came to the
event to request names and details of band members – even though all they were
doing was playing music in a night club (Brixton Mass).
This event was followed on Monday 11th by a
demonstration outside the US Embassy in Grosvenor Square where, for example my
friend Keith Mothersson, held a banner reading “Honour the Dead – Tell The
Truth” (see attached photos). The group of about 100 people all know the truth
about the large and ongoing deception which is being perpetrated by the US and
UK governments and the media.
With the latter group of people in mind, the party then
moved on to display their message outside the BBC at White City and distribute
leaflets and disks.
All of this was ignored by the main news. However, on the
evening of Monday 11th, Prof David Ray Griffin appeared with Tim
Sparke (Director of Mercury Media) on James Whale’s radio show on Talk Sport.
This 2-hour appearance drew an audience of an estimated 1 million
listeners and David Ray Griffin discussed many of the main aspects of
9/11 Truth. (Copy available on request.)
On Tuesday 12th September, I had the privilege
of meeting Prof Griffin at an event organised by Tim Sparke. This event was held
for members of the press and other invited guests, as well as a number of UK
campaigners. At least 2 journalists were in attendance, and I met and briefly
spoke with MP for Lewes Norman Baker – the only MP in attendance. I also spoke
with someone from the BBC who has become aware of the issues and I provided some
information to them.
In the last week, a new 27-minute film has been released, a
copy of which I have included on the enclosed DVD. It is called “Ludicrous
Diversion” – this was one of the expressions Mr Blair used to describe a
proposed full public enquiry into the events of 7th July 2005. The
film documents the disturbing pattern of events
in the aftermath of 7/7 and how evidence has been tampered with and how
there is little possibility that the supposed suicide bombers could be
prosecuted in court if the available evidence were to be used to try them. As
you may recall, I wrote to you soon after the events of 7/7 presenting evidence
which is documented in this film. I don’t know who made this film.
On the same theme, the DVD also includes a slightly longer
film about 7/7 primarily made by two of my friends – Adrian Connock and David
Shayler.
I believe what we are seeing here is people like us
fulfilling the functions that existing bodies are not. We are publicly
presenting and discussing evidence (as Public Enquiries should) and making films
about these issues (as established media organisation should be). However, due
to nature of the material, these bodies are either unwilling or unable to deal
with these issues of gravitas.
It is only a matter of time before these issues become
foremost in most people’s minds and therefore the sooner that they are
investigated and discussed more widely, the better for all of us. In closing, I
include a short article from the Daily Mail, which proved itself to have the
most accurate representation of 9/11 Truth issues (albeit buried in the middle
pages).
I will write again when I feel it is my duty to inform you
of important facts and events (related to the 9/11 Truth Campaign) which no one
else is likely to advise you of.
As ever, thank you for time spent in reading this letter.
Please contact me if you would like any further information or clarification.
Yours Sincerely,
Andrew Johnson
05/09/06 - News section
Fury as academics claim 9/11 was 'inside job'
by JAYA
NARAIN
The 9/11
terrorist attack on America which left almost 3,000 people dead was an
"inside job", according to a group of leading academics.
Around 75 top
professors and leading scientists believe the attacks were puppeteered by war
mongers in the White House to justify the invasion and the occupation of
oil-rich Arab countries.
See
also...
• New
DNA bid to identify 9/11 victims
• Flight
93 'was shot down' claims book
• Iran's
president keeps promise to purge universities of 'liberals'
The claims
have caused outrage and anger in the US which marks the fifth anniversary of the
terrorist attacks on Monday.
But leading
scientists say the facts of their investigations cannot be ignored and say they
have evidence that points to one of the biggest conspiracies ever perpetrated.
Professor
Steven Jones, who lectures in physics at the Brigham Young University in Utah,
says the official version of events is the biggest and most evil cover up in
history.
He has joined
the 9/11 Scholars for Truth whose membership includes up to 75 leading
scientists and experts from universities across the US.
Prof Jones
said: "We don't believe that 19 hijackers and a few others in a cave in
Afghanistan pulled this off acting alone.
"We
challenge this official conspiracy theory and, by God, we're going to get to the
bottom of this."
In essays and
journals, the scientists are giving credence to many of the conspiracy theories
that have circulated on the internet in the past five years.
They believe a
group of US neo-conservatives called the Project for a New American Century, set
on US world dominance, orchestrated the 9/11 attacks as an excuse to hit Iraq,
Afghanistan and later Iran.
The group says
scientific evidence over the attacks on the World Trade Centre and the Pentagon
is conclusive proof.
Professor
Jones said it was impossible for the twin towers to have collapsed in the way
they did from the collision of two aeroplanes.
He maintains
jet fuel does not burn at temperatures high enough to melt steel beams and
claims horizontal puffs of smoke seen during the collapse of the towers are
indicative of controlled explosions used to bring down the towers.
The group also
maintains World Trade Centre 7 - a neighbouring building which caught fire and
collapsed later in the day - was only partially damaged but had to be destroyed
because it housed a clandestine CIA station.
Professor
James Fetzer, 65, a retired philosopher of science at the University of
Minnesota, said: "The evidence is so overwhelming, but most Americans don't
have time to take a look at this."
The 9/11
Commission dismissed the numerous conspiracy theories after its exhaustive
investigation into the terror attacks.
Subsequent
examinations of the towers' structure have sought to prove they were
significantly weakened by the impact which tore off fire retardant materials and
led the steel beams bending under heat and then collapsing.
Christopher
Pyle, professor of constitutional law at Mt Holyoake College in Massachusetts,
has dismissed the academic group.
He said:
"To plant bombs in three buildings with enough bomb materials and wiring?
It's too huge a project and would require far too many people to keep it a
secret afterwards.
"After
every major crisis, like the assassinations of JFK or Martin Luther King, we've
had conspiracy theorists who come up with plausible scenarios for gullible
people. It's a waste of time."
But University
of Wisconsin assistant professor, Kevin Barrett, said experts are unwilling to
believe theories which don't fit into their belief systems.
He said:
"People will disregard evidence it if causes their faith to be shattered. I
think we were all shocked. And then, when the voice of authority told us what
happened, we just believed it."
As the fifth
anniversary approached, the 9/11 Scholars for Truth is urging Congress to reopen
the investigation claiming they have amassed a wealth of scientific evidence to
prove their version of the terror attacks.
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
