Collapse of Twin Towers, and much else, explained.

[ConspiracyTheorySceptic]

For all truth-seakers, here is the truth:

http://www.debunking911.com/towers.htm

CTS

[Skeptic]

this page provides no plausible explanation for the failure of the 47 core columns

[PatrickBatemen]

its funny how people assume those sites are fact and refer to people who offer another explanation as a conspiracy theorist, when by definition thets only a theory itself,

[chek]

Nor does it account for the molten (not 'melted') steel.

Any explanation that does not deal with ALL the facts is not an explanation - it's plausible sounding drivel.

[Pikey]

This site is a sister site of 911myths and incorporates much of the same information and lacks accountability or openess. There is no forum nor does the site identify who has compiled or resourced it.

There is alot of information on it, but those who have not yet read David Ray Griffins "The New Pearl Harbour Disturbing questions about the Bush administration and 9/11" please read it first then analyse this IMO highly deceptive website and you be the judge.

The site does not explain how WTC 1,2 and 7 collapsed at freefall speed falling on its footprint and it ignores many of the eyewitness statements.

Finally this thread should have appeared in Critics Corner and those responsible for putting it here know the rules. Instead they have put it in the "General" section but they have no respect for this website nor those who choose not to accept the official conspiracy theory of 911 as presented by the Kean commission.

A theory which is financially resourced by taxpayers/economic slaves who fund the small band of Shills/Trolls who incessantly blog here at an abnormal rate.

These shills/trolls never play the ball they always play the man because what they are trying to do is to trigger your anger and get you to do something extreme, then they will call you a terrorist!

My advice to everyone is read what they have to say in CC if you wish but dont give it any negative energy. Ask the tough questions there if you feel they are necessary but I am pretty sure that you will never get an answer to the question.

Follow the example set by Mahatma Gandhi comrades and you wont go wrong!

I trust our moderators will put this in the appropriate section, Critics Corners. The mainstream INDEPENDENT media would of course just censore/ignore it!

Peace & truth

[PatrickBatemen]

denying bin laden was a CIA asset! all the explosions were natrual blah blah, free fall fallacy yeah like a 1700 ft skyscrapper falling in 8 seconds is not free fall speed.

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Why isn't CTS rushing off to claim his 'no explosives used 9/11' prize on 'reopen911' if that link fulfills all the criteria of a no explosives collapse?

[xmasdale]

They're getting desperate. This is such nonsense.

Even if there were no fireproof cladding on either the outer or the central core steel columns, a carbon fueled fire will not reach temperatures great enough to sever steel, buckle it or make it bend or distort a little possibly.

The hope presumably is, that though they know their thread will be moved to critics corner, that will not be until after some people have looked at their new website.

<big yawn>

Noel

[prole art threat]

It's not the thories of this nature that are the problem, it is the dumb bunnies who believe them. The 9/11 Truth Movement v The Dunderheads.

Maybe World War 3 would be a good thing after all? At least it would put an end to the nonsense I have to undure from the majority, who will fight tooth and nail supporting any garbage that refutes the truth.

I dont particularly want to protect the world from martial law and the apocalypse, anymore.

Bring on the bombs and let pruning commence.