Veterans Today

[ian neal]

http://www.veteranstoday.com/category/wars/911-and-terror-war/

Prompted by outsider's post I took a brief look at an organisation veterans today that I hadn't really looked at before.

Does anyone know anything about it?

How did people become aware of it?

When did it go online?

It gives an air of being an established organisation and influential amongst us veterans but is that true (in which case it would be significant) or is it a fascade?

It certainly has an intertesting board. Can Hamid Gul be taken at face value as a champion of freedom?

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/08/04/general-hamid-gul-former-head- of-pakistans-isi-joins-veterans-today/

I'm interested in people's responses.

[Thermate911]

Okay, I'll bite.

IME, as a so-called alternative site, it has offered about the most relevant, consistent and hard-hitting articles still available in the US. Gordon Duff particularly comes over as a bona-fide disillusioned military veteran, always willing to converse and follow research pointers.

The site has been in existence since 2004 though only last year got such a facelift. It has been promoted by such 'icons of angry America' as Mike Rivero & Jeff Rinse-well-before-chewing.

One of its most astounding features in the present paranoia is it still allows anonymous comments, a fact which can be taken either way. The authors often respond meaningfully to such comments, too.

'I give it 4.5', give moral support and visit often, whilst keeping firmly in mind that every movement and organisation is always open to subversion especially now the Ba'Vomits have come out into the open for their endgame and the pentagoons Operation Blitz-The-Net 'starts' this Friday, 1st October.

Gul? - An intelligent agentur, IMO. He's now covered all the way from poorrichard right through to globalresearch.ca ...

But then, I reckon limited hangout is always better than no hangout, unlike some people around here...

[outsider]

If it quacks like a dissenter, waddles like a dissenter and appears to be a dissenter, it probably is a dissenter.
Alternatively, if the Dirty Tricks Depts. wish to give our concerns web-space, who are we to complain?:

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2010/09/28/new-act-of-israeli-piracy-sop- memory-of-murdered-american-dims/

[ian neal]

The reason I asked is that if this were a US Veterans organisation with a significant track record with a high profile and level of support amongst US vets and current servicemen, then their support for 9/11 truth would be highly significant and welcome. But since it apears that that is not really the case (unless others know otherwise) then their support is of far less significance.

That's all

[outsider]

[insidejob]

Outsider
However marginal they may be, they are a very welcome addition to the Truth Movement.

Gordon Duff, the editor of Veteran's Today, has written for Global Research and has been interviewed by No Lies Radio. They are part of the Truth movement.

I think Ian's interest in them because they host Holocaust Denial and therefore wanted to brand them Nazis. It has been easy to brand one individual as a Nazi but it is not feasible to do that to Veterans Today. There are too many of them and they are too respected by significant elements of the Truth Movement.

[outsider]

[outsider]