Bush sees possible Iraq-Vietnam parallel

[conspiracy analyst]

http://today.reuters.com/news

If the neo-con 9/11 false flag operators don't seek to go for a pullout they will orchestrate another provocation in order to get embroiled in another war.
Like a junkie who needs his next fix, the gangsters that run the White (what an irony!) House will need to get moving over the next period.

Indications are with the stories being ratched up in the UK that they will do something. The lapdog to the chief honcho usually comes off worse. The closer you are to the Americans the more you have to sacrifice to prove your total allegiance.

The 'war on terror' cannot end as the ideological basis of the existence of the USA would be in question. They have spent millions re-marketing their brand, imprisoned thousands, promoted Guantanamo and Abu Ghraib and now they voted in a Torture Act in contravention to everything the Geneva Conventions ever stood for and habeas corpus as well.

Sensing defeat staring them in the face they have to move onto the offensive.

Will they go for it? Or wont they?

[Mark Gobell]

This James Baker report is interesting. The fact that a report of this magnitude that detracts from US policy is publicised at all should raise our collective eyebrows. Taken as the twin of General Dannant's much publicised critique of UK military policy in Iraq, which Bliar agrees with, confirms that something is on the cards. There are, of course, no accidents.

The Balkanisation of Iraq has always been the objective so maybe that's the denouement to the Iraq fiasco. Holding one's breath would be ill advised as I was reminded tonight by Snowygrouch in Oxford of the PNAC statement of purpose from Rebuilding America's Defences - page 9, I quote:

In short, anything less than a clear two war capacity threatens to devolve into a nowar strategy.

So, as one begins to wind down, another must take it's place lest we descend into the utter madness of no war at all.