FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Details Of Next False Flag Operation?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Me
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 8:56 pm    Post subject: Details Of Next False Flag Operation? Reply with quote

Today on Fox’s Neil Cavuto show Col. Peters,
“I expect a nuclear device to go off in a US city“. Fox has repeated this mantra often, "it's not a matter of if, but when".

Also, I read at a forum that according to the Hal Turner show, “based on inside sources”, a US aircraft carrier will be sunk and blamed on Iran as a pretext for war. We do after all have carriers in that region.

Based on all of the chatter, something will surely happen. Then again, a lot of this is also well-timed fear-mongering to scare the masses in to the arms of the "security aware" GOP. There are some big elections coming up and the right's biggest issue based on the polls is security.

http://www.topix.net/forum/us/navy/T7VCPE1VD63L77ML8

Quote:
"THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to
support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon
fodder."
IRAN WAR PLAN EXPOSED!
PREPARE FOR THE SINKING OF A U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER - The USS Enterprise CVN-65!
From: RBOW
> The existence of a hideous plan to sacrifice a U.S. Aircraft Carrier as a
pretext for war with Iran is presently being uncovered!>> The Hal Turner Show has been told that within the next five (5) weeks, the
United States will "suffer" a missile attack upon the aircraft carrier USS
Enterprise, presently on patrol near the Persian Gulf. This attack will appear
to be from numerous "Silkworm" and/or "Sunburn" missiles which will sink the
vessel and kill most of the 5,000 crew onboard.>> The "attack" will be blamed on Iran and thus provide the Bush Administration
with an excuse to go to war with that nation.>> The Hal Turner Show has learned that the missiles used to attack the USS
Enterprise will not be fired from or by Iran, but rather will be a "false flag
operation" made to LOOK as though Iran carried out the attack!!>> The USS Enterprise is the worlds first nuclear powered aircraft carrier. It
was Commissioned in 1961 and is due to be decommissioned in 2014 or 2015. The
ship was selected to be the "victim" of this "attack" due to its age.>> THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view
the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to
support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon
fodder.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
chek
Mega Poster
Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:02 pm    Post subject: Re: Details Of Next False Flag Operation? Reply with quote

Me wrote:
Today on Fox’s Neil Cavuto show Col. Peters,
“I expect a nuclear device to go off in a US city“. Fox has repeated this mantra often, "it's not a matter of if, but when".

Also, I read at a forum that according to the Hal Turner show, “based on inside sources”, a US aircraft carrier will be sunk and blamed on Iran as a pretext for war. We do after all have carriers in that region.

Based on all of the chatter, something will surely happen. Then again, a lot of this is also well-timed fear-mongering to scare the masses in to the arms of the "security aware" GOP. There are some big elections coming up and the right's biggest issue based on the polls is security.

http://www.topix.net/forum/us/navy/T7VCPE1VD63L77ML8

Quote:
"THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to
support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon
fodder."
IRAN WAR PLAN EXPOSED!
PREPARE FOR THE SINKING OF A U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER - The USS Enterprise CVN-65!
From: RBOW
> The existence of a hideous plan to sacrifice a U.S. Aircraft Carrier as a
pretext for war with Iran is presently being uncovered!>> The Hal Turner Show has been told that within the next five (5) weeks, the
United States will "suffer" a missile attack upon the aircraft carrier USS
Enterprise, presently on patrol near the Persian Gulf. This attack will appear
to be from numerous "Silkworm" and/or "Sunburn" missiles which will sink the
vessel and kill most of the 5,000 crew onboard.>> The "attack" will be blamed on Iran and thus provide the Bush Administration
with an excuse to go to war with that nation.>> The Hal Turner Show has learned that the missiles used to attack the USS
Enterprise will not be fired from or by Iran, but rather will be a "false flag
operation" made to LOOK as though Iran carried out the attack!!>> The USS Enterprise is the worlds first nuclear powered aircraft carrier. It
was Commissioned in 1961 and is due to be decommissioned in 2014 or 2015. The
ship was selected to be the "victim" of this "attack" due to its age.>> THOSE PLANNING THE ATTACK ARE INSIDE THE U.S. AND ISRAELI GOVERNMENTS and view
the loss of the Enterprise crew as a necessary sacrifice to induce Americans to
support war against Iran. Put bluntly, the ship and crew are to be cannon
fodder.


The best thing to do is post this item on every forum we can think of. The more people that know in advance, the better.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342

PostPosted: Wed Oct 18, 2006 9:09 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

If they do attack Iran I trully believe the West hasn't the muscle to win!
We rely on imported energy too heavily and all the resource laden countries are at odds with the plan as they are the down trodden 3rd world, Russia or the remainder of the Middle East :0
Take Europe for example, all Russia has to do is say look I told you No and out go the lights :0

_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342

PostPosted: Thu Oct 19, 2006 4:32 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Current headline on BBCs Radio Five live 5pm on 19/10/06
Bin Ladin No. 1 wanted man in UK, even though he was found dead from Typhoid for a second time.
Also on the report is that Al Qaeda is at large in UK and can strike imminently, they have become good at evaiding authorities and structured themselves like IRA!
So expect a UK Psy-Op imminently!!

_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Me
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 6:28 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wouldn’t you just know it. The threat of maritime targets is suddenly on the rise. The foreshadowing is screaming out loud.

link

Maritime Risks Increase For Cruise Ships And Ferries


Quote:
A just published Rand report entitled "Maritime and Terrorism: Risk and Liability" states that maritime terrorism risk includes cruise ships and ferries. The Insurance Journal quoted Rand report co-author Peter Chalk on Oct. 16 as saying: "Attacks on cruise ships and ferry boats would meet the interrelated requirements of visibility, destruction and disruption that drive transnational terrorism in the contemporary era. Recognizing this is essential to any comprehensive regime of maritime security."


Quote:

If they do attack Iran I trully believe the West hasn't the muscle to win!


Don't have the manpower. I believe they will use airstrikes.

Quote:
The best thing to do is post this item on every forum we can think of. The more people that know in advance, the better.


Absolutely.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342

PostPosted: Fri Oct 20, 2006 4:33 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Its not man power I'm conserned with, its the fact Russia and China my get involved plus it will certainly make driving a rich only sport Rolling Eyes
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter


Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342

PostPosted: Mon Oct 23, 2006 4:20 pm    Post subject: Lookout now its the taliban in the UK Reply with quote

Afghan militants 'plan UK attacks'
Afghan militants are for the first time plotting to attack westerners in Britain and the rest of Europe, a Taliban commander has claimed.

Mullah Mohammed Amin, a former official in the Taliban government, has said militants have stockpiles of weapons and would never give up exacting revenge from "the foreign invaders."

In an exclusive interview with Sky News, he confirmed that Taliban fighters are taking refuge within neighbouring Pakistan and are being helped by locals sympathetic to their cause.

Amin, an official in the Taliban government at the time of the US-led coalition invasion in 2001, said the resurgent Taliban was inspired by tactics used by militants in Iraq, and wants to export terror to the West.

Referring to Tony Blair and George Bush, Amin said: "It's acceptable to kill ordinary people in Europe because these are the people who have voted in the Government.

"They came to our home and attacked our women and children.

"The ordinary people of these countries are behind this - so we will not spare them.

"We will kill them and laugh over them like they are killing us and laughing at us."

He said Taliban fighters are learning from the Iraq insurgency in their use of remote-controlled bombs, land mines and suicide bombers.

He said: "They are our best tactic."


http://news.uk.msn.com/Article.aspx?cp-documentid=1108626

_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'


“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”


www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message Visit poster's website
Me
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431

PostPosted: Wed Oct 25, 2006 9:14 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

(previous post)
Quote:
IRAN WAR PLAN EXPOSED!
PREPARE FOR THE SINKING OF A U.S. AIRCRAFT CARRIER - The USS Enterprise CVN-65!


(update)
All the criteria are now satisfied. Naval war games, forces positioned near Iran (USS Enterprise deployed), desire for war etc...

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/October2006/251006games.htm

US naval war games off the Iranian coastline: A provocation which could lead to War?

Quote:
There is a massive concentration of US naval power in the Persian Gulf and the Arabian Sea. Three US naval strike groups off the Iranian coastline are deployed: USS Enterprise, USS Eisenhower and USS Iwo Jima Expeditionary Strike Group.


The naval strike groups have been assigned to fighting the "global war on terrorism."

Tehran considers the US war games to be conducted in the Persian Gulf, off the Iranian coastline as a provocation, which is intended to trigger a potential crisis and a situation of direct confrontation between US and Iranian naval forces in the Persian Gulf:

"Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.

Iran's official news agency IRNA quoted an unnamed foreign ministry official as describing the military manoeuvres as dangerous and suspicious.
Reports say the US-led naval exercises based near Bahrain will practise intercepting and searching ships carrying weapons of mass destruction and missiles.

The Iranian foreign ministry official said the US-led exercises were not in line with the security and stability of the region. Instead, they are aimed at fomenting crises, he said." (quoted in BBC, 23 October 2006)

USS Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG 5) to arrive in Arabian Sea

The USS Boxer (LHD 4), --which is the flagship for the Boxer Expeditionary Strike Group (ESG 5)-- which left Singapore on October 16, is scheduled to join the three naval strikes groups. ESG 5 is comprised of USS Boxer, Bunker Hill, USS Dubuque (LPD Cool, USS Comstock (LSD 45), USS Benfold (DDG 65), and USS Howard (DDG 83). ESG 5 also includes PHIBRON 5, the 15th MEU, Coast Guard Cutter Midgett (WHEC 726).

“We are about to enter a part of the world that can be very dangerous,” said Chief Aviation Ordnanceman (AW/SW) Jacques Beaver, Boxer’s flight deck ordnance chief. “We must be flexible and prepared to defend ourselves from any threats.”

Boxer has been preparing for the weapons upload for two months by completing required maintenance and electronic pre-checks. Checks ensure that the ship’s missile and launching systems are up to standard and safe to load with live ordnance.

“It has taken a lot of hard work for our people to get this done,” said Chief Fire Controlman (SW) William Lewis, combat systems, fire control division’s leading chief petty officer. “You cannot measure the importance of having these defenses guarding the lives of the Sailors and Marines in this strike group.”

BOXESG is comprised of USS Boxer (LHD 4), USS Bunker Hill (CG 52), USS Dubuque (LPD Cool, USS Comstock (LSD 45), USS Benfold (DDG 65) and USS Howard (DDG 83). The strike group also includes Amphibious Squadron 5, the 15th Marine Expeditionary Unit, Coast Guard Cutter Midgett (WHEC 726) and Canadian Frigate HMCS Ottawa (FFH 341).

BOXESG is currently conducting operations in support of the global war on terrorism while transiting to the Arabian
Gulf." (http://www.c7f.navy.mil/news/2006/october/3.htm)

Canada is part of the Expeditonary Strike Group (ESG 5)

Canada is formally participating in this military deployment under the disguise of the "war on terrorism". The Canadian Navy has dispatched Frigate HMCS Ottawa, which is now an integral part of ESG 5, under US Command. It is worth noting that particular emphasis has been given to medical evacuations and combat medical support suggesting that a combat scenario could be envisaged.

Boxer and Ottawa, both operating in the U.S. 7th Fleet area of responsibility, know that they can play a vital role to aid humanitarian assistance operations, medical evacuations or combat medical support that would rely heavily on the medical capabilities of the Boxer strike group. Cross training Sailors from ship to ship helps ensure the success of the strike group should BOXESG have to respond to any medical scenario, according to Richardson.

“Training is a necessary part of any evolution,” said Richardson. “Anytime you’re working with another nation, it’s important that we understand their capabilities just as much as they understand ours, so in the event anything occurs we know where our assets are.”

The cross training also fostered cooperation between the two allies which provided Verville and Boxer corpsmen a forum to learn about each other’s navies and each other’s culture." (Military.com October 2006)

Dangerous Crossroads: Tonkin II?

"An incident" in the Persian Gulf could be used by the US as a pretext for war against Iran.

A war pretext incident, similar to "the Gulf of Tonkin Incident", which triggered the Vietnam war, could be used by US forces, with a view to justifying retaliatory military action against Iran. In August 1964, President Lyndon B. Johnson claimed that North Vietnamese forces had attacked US destroyers in the Gulf of Tonkin. The Tonkin incident, which had been manipulated, contributed to unleashing a full-fledged war against Vietnam:

"A phantom attack on two U.S. destroyers cruising the Gulf of Tonkin was staged by the Pentagon and the C.I.A. The bogus attack occurred early in August, 1964. That evening President Lyndon Johnson went on television giving the grim details of the non-attack. Later, however, it was revealed that navy commander James Stockdale flew cover over the Gulf of Tonkin that night. Stockdale disclosed that U.S. ships were firing at phantom targets—targets that didn’t exist. The Gulf of Tonkin Incident that drew the U.S. into the quagmire of Viet Nam simply didn’t happen. Johnson, as presidents so often do, lied to the American people. The result was the rapid passage of the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution, which was the sole legal basis for the Viet Nam War. As a result of Johnson’s lie, three million Vietnamese people and fifty eight thousand U.S. soldiers died." (Charles Sullivan, Global Research, January 2006)
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
jameshawkings
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 26 Oct 2006
Posts: 26

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:05 pm    Post subject: Next Attack Date November 2nd Reply with quote

Thursday 2nd November seems like a high probability date for the next attack!

Here's why...

Let's focus on major attacks this century in the western world, such as 911, Madrid and the London bombings
The dates were as follows:-
USA - Tuesday 11th September 2001 = 911
Madrid - Thursday 11th March 2004 (3 days before Spanish general election) = 311
London - Thursday 7th July 2005 = 77

Is it just a coincidence that the date 911 is also the US emergency helpline? It could be a coincidence, but when we combine it with the fact that March 11th, 311, is the US urgent helpline (for incidents that aren't life threatening) What about 7/7? For some flight 77 which allegedly hit the Pentagon will come to mind, but also in many states by dialing #77 you get through directly to the police; it's yet another emergency number.

One of the most important emergency numbers is the world is the European Union one, it works over all European Union countries, and it is also used on GSM mobile networks. This number is 112. They advertise it as SOS 112. If we translate this to dates, we have either November 2nd or January 12th. Given that the organisers of such events seem to like the number 11, (they even used flight 11 for the North tower of the WTC), then it seems more likely to take place in the 11th month, on November 2nd. Also this would be convieniently just days before the November 7th US midterm elections. Comibining all this with the anti-islamic conditioning which the media has thrust upon us over the last few weeks, the warnings of upcoming attacks and the movement of a major US navel fleet into the Persian Gulf, and it becomes impossible to ignore.

I pray I'm wrong and I look stupid for writing this!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
doctorjaclblack
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

We've had the news reported here this week about George Bush coming under increasing pressure to withdraw from Iraq - yet he won't.

Anyone wonder as to why?

If next Thursday 2/11 or 11/2 is to be the day, will it be a planned attack on the USS Eisenhower as mentioned on Prison Planet? With the mid term elections now not too far away - will we all be sat watching the box this time next week as we did with 9/11?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
doctorjaclblack
Minor Poster
Minor Poster


Joined: 17 Aug 2006
Posts: 31

PostPosted: Thu Oct 26, 2006 6:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

And with news articles like this

http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/americas/6085768.stm
(Iran being accused of bomb in Argentina)

Is this yet more hype designed at a time to remind us all that Iran is an evil place and should be wiped off the map by the Bush administration?

Yet again more main stream media propoganda circling like flies around s**t. We will see more of this over the next week in the run up to the next event - why? - to sway people's opion by mind control.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group