| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 11:55 am Post subject: |
|
|
| chipmunk stew wrote: | | Patrick, that's about the biggest pile of steaming nonsense I've read all week. |
Are you getting annoyed yet? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chipmunk stew Moderate Poster


Joined: 19 Jul 2006 Posts: 833
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Patrick Brown wrote: | | chipmunk stew wrote: | | Patrick, that's about the biggest pile of steaming nonsense I've read all week. |
Are you getting annoyed yet? |
Annoyed that you're talking out of your arse, making up pseudoscientific nonsense about an attack that killed almost 3000 people? Annoyed that you do this while willfully refusing to examine the work that's been done by thousands of experienced professionals who have a very real personal and professional stake in getting it right? You're goddamn right I'm annoyed. _________________ "They, the jews, also have this thing about linage don't they?
We know a person from recent history who had a thing for linage and gene pools don't we?"
--Patrick Brown |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
aggle-rithm Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Aug 2006 Posts: 557
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 1:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Patrick Brown wrote: | | chipmunk stew wrote: | | Patrick, that's about the biggest pile of steaming nonsense I've read all week. |
Are you getting annoyed yet? |
Yes, you have successfully achieved trolldom. Happy? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Bushwacker Relentless Limpet Shill

Joined: 07 Sep 2006 Posts: 1628
|
Posted: Fri Oct 27, 2006 2:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Patrick Brown wrote: | | Anti-sophist wrote: | | chek wrote: | One would really have to wonder what kind of 'critical thinking' can see this as a result of a 'gravity driven collapse'.
My God.
You really can't awaken those pretending to be asleep.
|
Ah, I see, so your entire argument boils down like this: It just doesn't LOOK like a gravity driven collapse, to me. Case closed! |
Indeed the arcing debris are wholly suggestive of explosive charges (RDX / Shape Charges). |
Why do you say that? Even in controlled demolition it is gravity that brings the building down, the demolition charges having weakened its support. In the case of the towers, gravity also brought them down, the fires having weakened their support. There is no dispute that the collapse started at the fire floors in each case, so the top part of the building fell on the lower part, whether caused by fires or explosives. Viewed from above, as in this picture, there is therefore little reason why the collapse should look different. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|