View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:14 pm Post subject: The beginning of the end for Bliar? |
|
|
'It doesn't get much more serious than this'
BBC Corresponant, Nick Robinson
http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk_politics/5173860.stm
Labour fundraiser Levy arrested
Lord Levy is a close friend of Tony Blair
Tony Blair's chief fundraiser Lord Levy has been arrested in connection with the "cash-for-honours" inquiry by the Metropolitan Police.
Lord Levy, 61, made his money in the 1960s and 1970s, managing singers including Alvin Stardust and Chris Rea.
He was one of the key figures in the securing of the multi-million pound loans to the party last year.
Lord Levy, Mr Blair's regular tennis partner, has not been charged with any offence. All involved deny wrongdoing.
Wide-ranging investigation
Asked if he had any reaction to the news that Lord Levy had been arrested, the prime minister's official spokesman said: "I cannot comment on that, it is a party matter."
He confirmed the peer was still the prime minister's Middle East envoy.
A Scotland Yard spokesman would not confirm whether Lord Levy had been arrested, but did say a man had been arrested by the Specialist Crime Directorate of the Metropolitan Police in connection with inquiries into possible breaches of honours and election laws.
The spokesman said the man had been asked to attend a London police station on Wednesday morning and questioned about possible infringements of the Honours (Prevention of Abuses ) Act 1925 and the Political Parties Elections and Referendums Act.
Scotland Yard is conducting a wide-ranging investigation into loans and donations made to all three parties to see if there is any evidence that honours have been given as rewards for financial help.
It was prompted by the revelation earlier this year that a number of multi-million pound loans were secretly given to Labour before the last election, and that some of the lenders had subsequently been nominated by Tony Blair for peerages.
'Fate intertwined'
BBC Political Editor Nick Robinson said the arrest was "deeply damaging for Tony Blair" because Lord Levy is a particular friend of the prime minister.
He said the fate of Lord Levy and Mr Blair was "intertwined". "It doesn't get much more serious than this," he said.
A spokesman for Labour said the party "has and will continue to cooperate fully with this police investigation and, because of the ongoing nature of the investigation, we will not be commenting further".
Angus MacNeil, the Scottish Nationalist Party MP who initiated the police inquiry, called for a freeze on all future honours until the investigation is completed.
"This is a significant development and one that would appear to justify my decision to report this matter to the police," he said.
For the Conservatives the shadow home secretary David Davis said Lord Levy's arrest demonstrates "that the police are taking the cash for peereages question very seriously".
He added: "I want this issue cleared up once and for all in British politics." |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
There seems to be an assumption that if there is any kind of leadership issue in the Labour Party - triggered by stuff like this and Prescott - that Gordon Brown is a shoe-in. Brown has already demonstrated by his support for the renewal of Britain's nuclear defence that he isn't going to stray very far from Blair's agenda.
However, 9/11 sceptic Michael Meacher is widely believed to be prepared to throw his hat in the ring. How can we support him if he does? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Andrew Johnson Mighty Poster
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1919 Location: Derbyshire
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Quote: | However, 9/11 sceptic Michael Meacher is widely believed to be prepared to throw his hat in the ring. How can we support him if he does? |
Write to him and tell him how important disclosure of 9/11 truth is to the future of democracy!
Here's an extract of what I sent him a week or 2 ago:
Quote: | However, you are the only person with significant visibility in the entire UK political landscape that has publicly expressed doubts about key aspects of the Official 9/11 Story (or “The Official Conspiracy Theory” – OCT). There is growing disquiet among the ranks of many people like me regarding the treatment of this issue. It is the issue around which many (if not all) major geopolitical events and policy revolve. It is bigger than one person or one group – it is the single most important issue of our time. It must be dealt with and we need people from all walks of life to grasp it and face it “full on”, before another 9/11 Faked Terror Attack claims the lives of innocent people, and the draconian agenda behind it is advanced even further. |
_________________ Andrew
Ask the Tough Questions, Folks! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Andrew Johnson wrote: | Write to him and tell him how important disclosure of 9/11 truth is to the future of democracy! |
Yes, I think he is already aware of that.
I'm wondering what we can do to help him, as the only mainstream UK politician remotely onside, get elected as leader of his party.
Should Prescott be forced out of his position of deputy leader of the Labour Party, ergo Deputy Prime Minister, his position may either remain open or be temporarily filled by an acting deputy leader only until the next Labour Party conference. As he was elected as a package with Blair an election for both leader and deputy leader would be forced, according to the Labour Party constitution - though Blair has already done much to dismantle it.
The raising of Michael Meachers profile should only be a positive thing for us, surely! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DeFecToR Moderate Poster
Joined: 11 Jul 2006 Posts: 782
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 5:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would whole-heartedly support Michael Meacher. The problem however is not the level of public support he would have for a leadership run but how much party support he would have. And i'm affraid he's seen as somewhat of a pariah amongst labour members. _________________ "A great many people think they are thinking when they are merely rearranging their prejudices."
-William James |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leiff Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 509
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 6:27 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The only way to directly affect the result of any Labour leadership election is to join the Labour Party and take part in the election.
I won't be joining Labour by the way! |
|
Back to top |
|
|
alkmyst Moderate Poster
Joined: 21 Jan 2006 Posts: 177 Location: UK
|
Posted: Wed Jul 12, 2006 8:45 pm Post subject: Charisma Transplant |
|
|
Quote: | However, 9/11 sceptic Michael Meacher is widely believed to be prepared to throw his hat in the ring. How can we support him if he does? |
I really hate to mention it but Michael Meacher is going to need a 'Charisma Transplant' if he is going to stand any chance of fulfilling his ambition to lead the Labour Party!
Let's acknowledge reality...the only reason that he is mooted as a candidate for the Leadership is to prevent him from showing Loose Change II amongst his parliamentary colleagues.
Ego has apparently taken precedent over integrity.
Al K Myst |
|
Back to top |
|
|
insidejob Validated Poster
Joined: 14 Dec 2005 Posts: 475 Location: North London
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 9:50 am Post subject: Why is the funding investigation serious |
|
|
Why is this funding investigation being taken seriously by the police? We all assumed that the funding scandal would be quietly forgotten but no. What is behind this?
I think members of the criminal, banking cabal have concluded that the public have lost faith in both of their political vehicles - New Labour and Tories. They fear that both parties are unable to con the electorate into going along with neo-liberal policies. If Blair goes, then Labour may experience a shift to the left whether Brown likes it or not. Cameron has worked quite well but given recent bye-elections not well enough. The solution - a new so-called 'centre' party that will carry on the neo-liberal agenda.
If Labour is broken up then voters won't have any centre-left party likely to get into to party to vote for. They will be forced to vote for a new party based on left Tories, New Labour and Lib Dems. They will take forward the New Labour con pretend to be progressive but enacting neo-liberal policies.
But to do this, they will have to break up the parties. If Cameron pretends to shift left, he will alienate traditional Tories. While a funding crisis can torpedo Labour. Thus, the funding investigation is being taken seriously. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 10:18 am Post subject: |
|
|
I could support Meacher on the basis of:
"Well, heres a politician who has at least got ONE thing right"
But I dont feel under illusions about his ability as a whole _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Garcon Warrior Minor Poster
Joined: 17 May 2006 Posts: 93 Location: London
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 1:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The 9/11 Truth Campaign is to me about the corruption of our government's which at most the american government has killed 3 thousand of there own citizens so they could go to war for profit's of the corporation's there administration has ties to. Over the past 40 years we have seen the fruition of the long term objectives of the neo-cons finally taking place in our times.
The scandal that's taking place at the moment goes so deep I feel that when the truth finally comes out and the people who have caused these crimes against the human race are brought to justice our political system's will be brought down with them. There has been a lot of speculation of people higher than the governments owning both major party's so we are voting really for one party whoever gets in. We have the new Labour Prime Minister to be Gordon Brown already stating he wants to spend 25 billion on a new Trident system. And for the Conservative's we have Mr Cameron who voted yes to going to war in Iraq.
When we defeat the evil thats going on in this world are we really going to want to go back to a Democrat/Repuplican, Labour/Conservative governed country? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Martin Conner Validated Poster
Joined: 05 May 2006 Posts: 128 Location: 1984
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 2:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Politics is the plaything of the plutocrat!
People are programmed to follow the outlook projected through mass media. It is the media and its connections who ‘manage’ civilisation. An obsequient civilisation blinded by consumerism, celebrity and the capitalist paradigm.
Humanity must shatter the illusions predicated from a pulpit by an inbreeding clan of malfunctioning trailer trash. (Murdoch et al). IMO, we cannot solve the problems of today with the same thinking that created them.
Trying to establish meaningful results adhering to the protocols of the current political framework is a desolate exercise.
With the recent attacks against the almighty Israel from Lebanon, and the subsequent retaliation against Lebanon’s airport and coastal structures, the biblical apocalypse is taking yet another step towards Armageddon. _________________ In our age there is no such thing as 'keeping out of politics.' All issues are political issues, and politics itself is a mass of lies, evasions, folly, hatred and schizophrenia.
http://www.altruists.org/ |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dr Hemp Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Mar 2006 Posts: 197 Location: Totnes, Devon, UK
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Flamesong wrote: |
However, 9/11 sceptic Michael Meacher is widely believed to be prepared to throw his hat in the ring. How can we support him if he does? |
Although, Meacher seems a decent sort, despite his charisma by-pass, he has absolutely no chance of obtaining the Labour Leadership.
In any case, I don't think we could be credible if we offered any support to someone who is a member of a political party led by Tony Bliar, after what Labour have done since coming into power. If Meacher really had principles, he would resign from the Labour Party, no chance of that though.
We should oppose all Labour candidates and politicians; even if they are individually decent people, because then they must learn that no matter how decent they are, they will not get any support while they are a member of a fascist political party, led by a lying war criminal in the pockets' of America's Neo Cons.
In any case, I'm sure Bliar's chosen successor is David Cameron, you can almost see Bliar winking at Cameron, and this is no doubt why he gives Cameron such an easy ride at PMQ. _________________ Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored. - Aldous Huxley |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Leiff Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 23 May 2006 Posts: 509
|
Posted: Thu Jul 13, 2006 3:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The sad fact is that our political system is no longer 'fit for purpose'. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
flamesong Major Poster
Joined: 27 Jul 2005 Posts: 1305 Location: okulo news
|
Posted: Fri Jul 14, 2006 9:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
I keep hearing the word 'theatrical' being used by Levy and his representatives. I am starting to get the feeling that this might all be a huge stunt to clean up Blair's image.
If the parties being investigated accuse the police of overdoing it, it makes it look like the police are doing a good job in the public interest. After an exhaustive investigation, no wrongdoings are found (or perhaps, like the Hutton enquiry, there might be an insignificant rap on the knuckles for minor negligence, just for effect) and Blair can claim that he has been vindicated.
Somehow I can't see fellow apron wearers stitching each other up unless it is a sacrifice to benefit the ongoing agenda. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
numeral Validated Poster
Joined: 23 Dec 2005 Posts: 500 Location: South London
|
Posted: Sat Nov 04, 2006 11:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Killer e-mail' sends Blair into panic over cash for honours row
Quote: | Tony Blair is in a blind panic over the looming threat of being arrested in the police inquiry into the cash-for-peerages scandal, Cabinet sources have revealed.
A senior Minister said a 'black cloud' had descended over Downing Street at the growing realisation that the Prime Minister and his closest allies face the risk of being prosecuted over the affair.
The change of mood came as it was claimed that police had obtained a No10 'killer e-mail' which allegedly implicates Mr Blair's close ally and chief fundraiser, Lord Levy.
The e-mail, sent by Downing Street Chief of Staff Jonathan Powell, purportedly on the subject of honours, says: "ML (Michael Levy) will not be happy about this."
The suggestion is that the e-mail is the first piece of evidence that Lord Levy may have had a say in honours. Downing Street refused to comment on the e-mail.
When questioned by police, Lord Levy said that while he raised millions of pounds from rich donors, he had no say in peerages.
He says those decisions were taken by Mr Blair. In addition, The Mail on Sunday has been told that when he is questioned by police, Mr Blair intends to take legal advice from law firm Kingsley Napley, which helped Chilean dictator General Pinochet avoid extradition from the UK on torture charges.
Senior Kingsley Napley lawyer Stephen Parkinson formerly worked for Attorney General Lord Goldsmith, and advised Mr Blair before he gave evidence to the Hutton Inquiry into the death of Ministry of Defence weapons expert Dr David Kelly.
When the police investigation was first launched, some Ministers said the officers were merely going through the motions.
They have been rocked at the persistence shown by the inquiry leader, Metropolitan Police Deputy Assistant Commissioner John Yates. Sources close to Mr Yates say he has indicated he intends to interview Mr Blair under 'criminal caution' - which implies Mr Blair is being treated as a potential suspect.
The threat has caused fear and fury in Downing Street. Mr Blair is now said to be 'very worried' that he could be implicated as a result of the vast quantity of evidence obtained by police.
"No one took the inquiry very seriously at the outset, and no one thought the PM would be in any difficulties,' said a senior Minister.
"But as the weeks have gone by, the police have become more and more determined.
"We don't know what they have got, but the mood in No10 has changed. It doesn't look good."
Mr Blair's gloom is said to be shared by Lord Levy. A senior politician who spoke to him recently said: "He was in a bad way. It was like he was saying, "My life is in ruins, it is all so unfair."'
The inquiry was launched after it was revealed that four Labour donors who lent large sums to the party in unpublicised loans were subsequently nominated for peerages by Mr Blair last year.
The Lords committee which vets peerage nominations then blocked them.
The police have also interviewed Tory leaders over claims that they also effectively handed out peerages in return for donations.
Mr Yates is said to be more confident than ever that he has firm evidence that proves the award of peerages is linked to donations. |
_________________ Follow the numbers |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Sun Nov 05, 2006 1:30 am Post subject: |
|
|
Who said the press never carries any positive stories? _________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|