| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 9:13 pm Post subject: Re: Roadrunner |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | | im sure some kind of device |
 _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
THETRUTHWILLSETU3 9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 23 Jan 2006 Posts: 1009
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic


Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Fri Nov 24, 2006 10:00 pm Post subject: Re: Roadrunner |
|
|
| Quote: | 1. A contrivance or an invention serving a particular purpose, especially a machine used to perform one or more relatively simple tasks.
2. A technique or means.
----a. A plan or scheme, especially a malign one.
----b. A literary contrivance, such as parallelism or personification, used to achieve a particular effect.
3. A decorative design, figure, or pattern, as one used in embroidery.
4. A graphic symbol or motto, especially in heraldry.
5. Archaic. The act, state, or power of devising.
http://www.answers.com/device&r=67 |
Now come on sniff the foot. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chek Mega Poster


Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Sat Nov 25, 2006 12:24 am Post subject: Re: Roadrunner |
|
|
| THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | | chek wrote: | | THETRUTHWILLSETU3 wrote: | | Snowygrouch wrote: | TWSU3,
Your going to have to explain to me the correlation between a "roadrunner" and simple engineering calculations based on Tensile Strength and Stress forces applied.
Its really very straightforward; tested and also mathematically correct.
Any engineer will tell you the same. But what would engineers know about steel?
C. |
Snowy you are saying that a plane will hit a building and leave a plane shaped hole based on your calculations - what makes you think your calculations are correct? Have you had them checked out by anybody? else. I think you just made em up |
It would have been better to say you weren't convinced because the figures meant nothing to you, rather than make the unnecessarily gratuitous slur.
Remember a theory, contrary to popular belief, is not something to be protected and cherished at all costs - think of it as only a working hypothesis based on the information available to date. Once further info comes along that doesn't fit, it's time to give it the old heave-ho and devise a new one.
Any news on the inwardly exploding column theory? |
There is as much evidence of metal bent outwards, but nevertheless if there is any bent inwards then the perps would have planned it - im sure some kind of device could cause the explosion to blast inwards |
It's true some of the outer bright aluminium cladding is very distressed and hanging off th ewall at crazy angles (being soft and no longer supported), but if you look closely at photos of the impact area, you will see behind that, the darker brown columns either snapped off or bent inwards.
It's also true that strange vacuum events can occur within the eye of an explosion, but that tends to be measured in centimeters and confined to shaped charges, where the effect is for the purpose of directing the energy in the desired direction - into and through the armour of a tank for example, rather than uselessly away from it.
However a chaotic random crash by a large jetliner does not qualify and by definition an impact explosion is a sudden expansion of high velocity heated gas travelling outwards.
The only device powerful enough that could create enough suction to conceivably draw multiple steel columns inward would be some kind of singularity generator, which in the absence of a Romulan battle cruiser tbeing reported in the area, I'd be pretty sure airport security would confiscate. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
|