Webster Tarpley - Beam Weapon???????

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

If you watch the Webster Tarpley lecture 36 minutes 30 seconds into the presentation he says

" The building is being destroyed into thin air"

"My impression is that there are energy sources here that may be at the outer limits of convential controlled demolition"

"The most brutal I have ever seen"

That was nearly two years ago - what does he think now?

[Fallious]

He probably think i'd be convenient to find a beam weapon of some sort which can be used to vaporise thousands of tonnes of metal and concrete.

Seeing as he hasn't found one, he's shut up about it.

[Rabbie McM]

From listening to his broadcasts on RBN live (World Crisis Radio) I would state he still appears to be open minded to the cause of collapse and for that matter, doesn't rule out no big Boeings - certainly he has a respect for(if not agreement) with Nico Haupt. Tarpley talks about the building 6 crater a lot - in fact it was him that got me looking at that more closely.

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

next day the dust still clouded the skyline

You just don't get this with a conventional controlled demolition

see picture below

http://news.bbc.co.uk/hi/english/static/in_depth/americas/2001/day_of_ terror/in_pictures/20.stm

[flamesong]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

The dish called humble pie was a pie made of the inferior parts of the deer. These inferior parts, or humbles, may have been the kidneys, intestines, heart, or liver. They were boiled until tender, and mixed with suet, apples, currants, sugar, salt, and spices such as mace, cloves, and nutmeg. This delectable was originally eaten by hunters (who were at one time respectable members of society), but later it became a common food of servants. Of course, the higher classes traditionally dined on venison (deer meat). The English brought the dish to America, where venison was plentiful, and recipes for it appear in cookbooks right up to the 19th century. Many dishes used humbles from animals other than deer: "burseu" was made by parboiling pig viscera in wine.

Almost always used in the plural, this term for animal viscera has gone through several spellings over time. Numbles/nombles was the original (early 14th century) spelling. This was borrowed from Middle French nombles, meaning 'loin of veal; fillet of beef or venison'. The French is an alteration of Latin lumbulus, meaning 'a little loin'. In the 15th century, the English spelling umbles is first recorded; the spelling humbles first appears in the late 16th century. It's likely that the "umble" spelling arose from the mistaken word division of "a numble pie" as "an umble pie." And the later "humble" spelling arose from a connection made between this lowly, inferior food and the meaning of the unrelated adjective "humble." In fact, British dialectal pronunciation dropped the "h," so that "umble" and "humble" were pronounced alike.

The more familiar use of humble pie is 'humility forced on someone, often under embarrassing conditions'. This sense of 'humiliation' first appears in the early 19th century. The expression eat humble pie means 'to be forced to apologize humbly; suffer humiliation'. These meanings derive from a reference to the lowly pie eaten by the lower classes, and from the adjective humble, which is close in meaning to 'humiliated'.

Though I can't tell you why 'eating a lowly food' came to be associated with 'humiliation', there exists a similar expression in 19th century dialectal English. The English Dialect Dictionary records the idiom eat rue pie, meaning 'to rue, repent'. Wouldn't "rue pie" be an interesting name for a dish?

[Nambo]

When I watch the twin towers falling, it allways looks like something strange is going on in the way the building doesnt seem to collapse, it seems to turn into dust from the top to the bottom.
Why?
I could understand it the top floors turned to dust when they crashed into the ground but they become dust in mid-air, something strange must be doing that, WT7 didnt turn into dust like that.

There is said to be hardly any debri at the base of the twin towers, because the building on turning to dust has coated the ground for miles around with a thick layer of tiny dust particles.

And what made all those cars that wherent hit by any falling debri, just self-combust like that? http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam5.html

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Your absolutely right Nambo

Problem is virtually all of the people on this forum have been telling everybody it was explosives and are in denial - they come up with things like it's science fiction and there's no proof.

However they are unable to explain the very fine dust that hung in the air for days and the frazzled cars that appear to have exploded from within and your point that the building were turned to dust before they hit the ground.

I would like to hear David Shayler's take on this - maybe he can have it as a topic on his next radio show - maybe Annie could ask him?

[Fallious]

If everything was being vaporised, why do numerous buildings around the towers have huge parts of the the external columns stuck them?

How does a beam weapon explain the explosive force which sent the mass of the towers outward?

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Please rephrase your first question

RE Your second question - Have you ever put a potato in the microwave without pricking it - it explodes, however it contains no explosives.

[Andrew Johnson]

[Nambo]

[flamesong]

[Fallious]

And what of the helicopters that are circling the towers just before they came down? I guess the resonant frequencies dont affect them...

The cars are from the WTC 6 basement, this is misrepresented in the Beam Weapon article i've read. If the beam weapon was focused enough to damage only part of a car, how did it vaporise an area as wide as the WTC towers?

Have you seen the quantity of dust that building 7's demolition created? I remind you that they only cut the bottom of the building out in that demolition, yet the dust cloud is exactly the same as the WTC dust cloud but obviously it comes up from the ground.

Well, I guess they zapped B7 too, right? Hey, why didn't they zap B7 too?

[HERA]

[utopiated]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Hi Utopiated

Your point about the incriminating bits of paper that did not result from building 7 demolition (but lots of paper for WTC1 & 2) is a very interesting point and lends weight to the energy beam theory

Nice One

[Newspeak International]

All very interesting but provable to yer average bloke on the street?

This is worth further investigation:

[Newspeak International]

More here: http://www.mindfully.org/Food/Irradiate-Microwave-Effects-FoodMay96.ht m

I may chuck my mw oven now!

[Leiff]

The beam weapon might be able to make a mess of your dinner but how did it manage to create the explosions reported in the towers on 9/11?

I think that explosives are the more likely cause of the explosions myself.

[Worried]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

Just what do you think goes on at places like area 51? Butlins Holiday Camp

http://video.google.co.uk/videoplay?docid=3935426908707141430&q=area+5 1

[Fallious]

[John White]

[Newspeak International]

[Thermate]

[utopiated]

[Thermate]

Non-starter because there is no event that occurred that day that can't be explained with CD. High explosives can & do cause pulverization and dust. The bathtub was damaged. The steel did not vaporize it filled the 7 sub levels and was flung all over the site. Cars burn, when one car burns it can set fire to others. The hole in the roof of WTC6 is nowhere near circular and there is video of an explosion coming from that building anyway.

Until 'Tin-Hat Judy' comes up with something that's inexplicable by CD I'll stick with CD.

[alwun]

Thermate,

here are two photos of clean-up workers walking upright in the first basement sub-level. The basement levels are manifestly not filled with steel debris.

http://janedoe0911.tripod.com/StarWarsBeam4.html

scroll down to figs 311 and 312.

cheers Al..

[Thermate]

We don't know exactly where those 2 pictures were taken, but in all the other pictures plenty of steel is visible. Highly selective 'steel vaporizer' this beam weapon must be