The Philadephia Project - Parallels with 9/11?

[prole art threat]

I know I am going to get blown out of the water for this, but.....

...if they made a destroyor disappear, a few planes could also share the same fate, presumably? Just like that!

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/pages/philadelphia.html

[Fallious]

I think they are saving this for the fake alien invasion!

[telecasterisation]

[Hazzard]

I have been researching Rainbow for some time now and it is indeed a very odd situation.

Your hypothesis is definatly out there becuase it takes an immense amount of energy to effect the intended object. Infact it would take more energy then possible to generate within the cabin of a jetliner.

The only other explanation would be a projection based version which would require an enormous array, the size of something similar to the HAARP array in order to be able to project that much energy. Than you have the splash effects of the phenominon, which would be noticeable against the side of the tower where the impact would have taken place.

This is ofcourse all hypothetical so to be honest I dont think its possible.

The more you research into Rainbow, the wierder it gets too. Which is very frusterating.

[utopiated]

Great story... not enough decent witnesses.

Unless you count Al Bielek and Preston Nichols? The latter faked some sort of experiment with one of his machines that could pick up human thought. it was laughable when I saw it on video.

Poor old Al Bielek has also got 'UFO Disease' [ http://tinyurl.com/slql8 ] and adds a nice bit of exagerration each telling of the Philly / Montauk story. See www.bielek-debunked.com

Still it's a good yardstick for what technology can do by now [cough - BEAM weapons] if we were making ships invisible in 1940s. I think the links may end there though.