| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
prole art threat
Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Location: London Town
|
 Posted: Tue Nov 28, 2006 6:17 pm Post subject: Another question directed to the sluttish critics.... |
 |
|
Please, what does it feel like being Neocon bitches? I mean, you dont ever stop scrubbing and whitewashing, scrubbing a bit more. You guys make that Neocon doorstep sparkle! On a DAILY BASIS!!
What's it feel like being a Neocon jolly dolly slapper?
_________________
'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 2:50 pm Post subject: Re: Another question directed to the sluttish critics.... |
|
|
| prole art threat wrote: | Please, what does it feel like being Neocon bitches? I mean, you dont ever stop scrubbing and whitewashing, scrubbing a bit more. You guys make that Neocon doorstep sparkle! On a DAILY BASIS!!
What's it feel like being a Neocon jolly dolly slapper? |
Has anyone else noticed just how incredibly quiet the whole 9/11 debate has become? All the usual thermite/thermate diatribe that was a dull roar has diminished into silence, even the no-planers have shut up! As for that 'beam-weapon' jobby, that kinda died on its feet.
We have suddenly veered into all kinds of other topics with virtually not a whimper from the admins. This thread encapsulates a great held belief of mine, that if we cannot debate 9/11 (or associated), with our omnipresent nemesis 'the critics', we simply start a thread with no real topic, but simply just to hurl some abuse because there is other worthwhile thread where accepted wobbles can take place gratis.
In other words, let's stir up a fight just for the hell of it. This is truly bizarre behaviour and makes those that do it just as bad as those whom you despise. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 3:22 pm Post subject: Re: Another question directed to the sluttish critics.... |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | prole art threat wrote: | Please, what does it feel like being Neocon bitches? I mean, you dont ever stop scrubbing and whitewashing, scrubbing a bit more. You guys make that Neocon doorstep sparkle! On a DAILY BASIS!!
What's it feel like being a Neocon jolly dolly slapper? |
Has anyone else noticed just how incredibly quiet the whole 9/11 debate has become? All the usual thermite/thermate diatribe that was a dull roar has diminished into silence, even the no-planers have shut up! As for that 'beam-weapon' jobby, that kinda died on its feet.
We have suddenly veered into all kinds of other topics with virtually not a whimper from the admins. This thread encapsulates a great held belief of mine, that if we cannot debate 9/11 (or associated), with our omnipresent nemesis 'the critics', we simply start a thread with no real topic, but simply just to hurl some abuse because there is other worthwhile thread where accepted wobbles can take place gratis.
In other words, let's stir up a fight just for the hell of it. This is truly bizarre behaviour and makes those that do it just as bad as those whom you despise. |
Yes the whole beam weapon seems to have been a one week wonder.
But regardless of that - I bet my dad's got more evidence for CD at WTC7 than your dad -neh neh. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Wed Nov 29, 2006 11:17 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
Meet the Magic Marmite theory! The guru Jones postulates a new form of thermite with just the right properties, and then goes rather vague. My theory is a new form of Marmite with incredible explosive properties. This was spread on the back of extremely attractive calendars which a highly trained force of good-looking young people took into each office of the buildings and stuck on the pillars, charming anyone who made difficulties. Minature precision timing devices set off the Magic Marmite at exactly the right moment.
This theory was blatently ignored by the 9/11 Omission!
I CHALLENGE ANYONE TO DISPROVE IT
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006
Posts: 1850
Location: Currently Andover
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 2:37 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prole art threat
Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Location: London Town
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
Yes. Also, 9/11 Mysteries has emplyees making statements about 'construction work taking place behind the walls. There were 'construction type noises' and also 'a build up of dust on window sills'.
_________________
'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Thu Nov 30, 2006 4:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| prole art threat wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
Yes. Also, 9/11 Mysteries has emplyees making statements about 'construction work taking place behind the walls. There were 'construction type noises' and also 'a build up of dust on window sills'. |
That was Scott Forbes interview, should anybody want to Google more info. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 10:43 am Post subject: |
|
|
| telecasterisation wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
You are probably thinking of Scott Forbes who said that there was a power down on some of the floors in one of the towers over one weekend. If you have seen photos of buildings prepared for demolition, there is extensive preparation, the columns are exposed and drilled, demolition charges carefully placed round them and all wired up. To do this to every column and then conceal that it had been done would be a mammoth undertaking. It takes weeks of work to prepare a building for demolition, acting quite openly and with no concealment. To say that it could all be done much more simply with charges placed within the lift shafts raises the question of why demolition companies go to all the trouble of doing it another way if all their work is unnecessary. It is hardly logical to say that it must have been controlled demolition because it looks so much like it, but it was done in a completely different way.
The unoccupied floors might be significant if the collapse showed any sign of being different on some floors to others, but in actual fact the collapse wave went smoothly from one floor to another. There was someone who worked in WTC7 (was it for Smith Barney?) who said they were jam-packed in there after a merger, people were working there 24/7, and no way could explosives have been placed.
Fundamentally, there is simply no evidence at all that explosives were used, and the huge difficulties which would have had to be overcome to do so argue so strongly against it as to effectively make it impossible.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 11:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
You are probably thinking of Scott Forbes who said that there was a power down on some of the floors in one of the towers over one weekend. If you have seen photos of buildings prepared for demolition, there is extensive preparation, the columns are exposed and drilled, demolition charges carefully placed round them and all wired up. To do this to every column and then conceal that it had been done would be a mammoth undertaking. It takes weeks of work to prepare a building for demolition, acting quite openly and with no concealment. To say that it could all be done much more simply with charges placed within the lift shafts raises the question of why demolition companies go to all the trouble of doing it another way if all their work is unnecessary. It is hardly logical to say that it must have been controlled demolition because it looks so much like it, but it was done in a completely different way.
The unoccupied floors might be significant if the collapse showed any sign of being different on some floors to others, but in actual fact the collapse wave went smoothly from one floor to another. There was someone who worked in WTC7 (was it for Smith Barney?) who said they were jam-packed in there after a merger, people were working there 24/7, and no way could explosives have been placed.
Fundamentally, there is simply no evidence at all that explosives were used, and the huge difficulties which would have had to be overcome to do so argue so strongly against it as to effectively make it impossible. |
Didn't you hear? The WTC towers were a unique design, like a hollow tube! Take out just a few columns on one side and the whole thing falls perfectly symmetrically... |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Fri Dec 01, 2006 9:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fallious wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | telecasterisation wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | Yes, old prole fart would do far better to come up with a new theory, beam weapons is a bit OTT even for the average truthshirker. What is needed is an explanation of how explosives could be attached to each column in all three buildings, and I have a far better one than the standard, "Well, er, no one like noticed men tying charges to all the pillars and wiring them up"
[/b] |
I am not attempting to offer 'proof', but surely this was explained away by way of the many security drills carried out prior to 9/11 - everyone being evacuated for extended periods would mean any 'work' would not be witnessed. This has been discussed to death (no pun).
Not to mention that a considerable number of floors were unoccupied by staff so anything could be done on those. |
You are probably thinking of Scott Forbes who said that there was a power down on some of the floors in one of the towers over one weekend. If you have seen photos of buildings prepared for demolition, there is extensive preparation, the columns are exposed and drilled, demolition charges carefully placed round them and all wired up. To do this to every column and then conceal that it had been done would be a mammoth undertaking. It takes weeks of work to prepare a building for demolition, acting quite openly and with no concealment. To say that it could all be done much more simply with charges placed within the lift shafts raises the question of why demolition companies go to all the trouble of doing it another way if all their work is unnecessary. It is hardly logical to say that it must have been controlled demolition because it looks so much like it, but it was done in a completely different way.
The unoccupied floors might be significant if the collapse showed any sign of being different on some floors to others, but in actual fact the collapse wave went smoothly from one floor to another. There was someone who worked in WTC7 (was it for Smith Barney?) who said they were jam-packed in there after a merger, people were working there 24/7, and no way could explosives have been placed.
Fundamentally, there is simply no evidence at all that explosives were used, and the huge difficulties which would have had to be overcome to do so argue so strongly against it as to effectively make it impossible. |
Didn't you hear? The WTC towers were a unique design, like a hollow tube! Take out just a few columns on one side and the whole thing falls perfectly symmetrically... |
Right, so that's why they fell down immediately the planes crashed into them and took out a few columns, and the designer who compared them to a mosquito net being poked with a pencil was obviously nuts. And of course WTC7 were also unique because........no other building was called WTC7.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
