| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
prole art threat
Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Location: London Town
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
 Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 7:47 am Post subject: |
 |
|
are you sure he said bomb and not tornado  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, there was a lot of confusion on that day, inevitably. What about it?
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | Yes, there was a lot of confusion on that day, inevitably. What about it? |
im pretty sure the emergency services are use to confusion and wouldnt of cleared the area of emergencie workers who are there to save lives unless they were sure there own lives where immediatley in danger.
i carnt see them evacuating because of confussion. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:50 am Post subject: |
|
|
| marky 54 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | Yes, there was a lot of confusion on that day, inevitably. What about it? |
im pretty sure the emergency services are use to confusion and wouldnt of cleared the area of emergencie workers who are there to save lives unless they were sure there own lives where immediatley in danger.
i carnt see them evacuating because of confussion. |
I am sure they are used to confusion, and do not panic, but that does not mean there is no confusion. The emergency services have to rely on information they are given, which may not be accurate. No one, as far as I know, has suggested there actually was a bomb in a van, as in the first clip. There was a great fear about a third plane, which was unfounded
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Tue Dec 12, 2006 8:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | marky 54 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | Yes, there was a lot of confusion on that day, inevitably. What about it? |
im pretty sure the emergency services are use to confusion and wouldnt of cleared the area of emergencie workers who are there to save lives unless they were sure there own lives where immediatley in danger.
i carnt see them evacuating because of confussion. |
I am sure they are used to confusion, and do not panic, but that does not mean there is no confusion. The emergency services have to rely on information they are given, which may not be accurate. No one, as far as I know, has suggested there actually was a bomb in a van, as in the first clip. There was a great fear about a third plane, which was unfounded |
i see your point in some aspects but where your missing mines is, firemen will not abandon people in need unless they are certain the information to be true, they are professionals trained and put there lives on the line on a daily basis, why evacuate unless you are certain? they would not abandon unless its been confirmed and double checked. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
