| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
prole art threat
Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Location: London Town
|
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Ignatz
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 918
|
 Posted: Fri Dec 15, 2006 3:32 pm Post subject: |
 |
|
It's been around for quite a while.
As I recall it was some Polish(?) bloke just arrived in a taxi from the airport.
_________________
So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 12:31 am Post subject: |
|
|
That same piece of film is also included in the compilation of 44 clips of the planes striking (no doubt all manipulated, according to PAT!) here.
Even on the original version the plane is clearer than the rope or beam from the helicopter PAT claimed to see.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
prole art threat
Validated Poster
Joined: 13 Apr 2006
Posts: 804
Location: London Town
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:03 am Post subject: |
|
|
Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day.
_________________
'Maybe if I can show some lurking kids that this is all a pack of lies, then maybe I can make a difference. I don't plan on converting any of you because you're all mad.'
-Johnny Pixels |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Ignatz
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006
Posts: 918
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| prole art threat wrote: | | Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day. |
Total ballix, but still a lovely avatar. I have taken a copy. Hope that's OK?
_________________
So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
| prole art threat wrote: | | Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day. |
Yes, well, the lizards had to survey the whole of Manhattan Island and the mainland to locate all possible cameras and send out beams to affect the images they had recorded as well as exercising their mind control functions to make people think they had seen planes when they had not. With so much to do, no wonder small details like plane velocity were not perfect.
Alternatively, you could be wrong.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 7:51 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | prole art threat wrote: | | Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day. |
Yes, well, the lizards had to survey the whole of Manhattan Island and the mainland to locate all possible cameras and send out beams to affect the images they had recorded as well as exercising their mind control functions to make people think they had seen planes when they had not. With so much to do, no wonder small details like plane velocity were not perfect.
Alternatively, you could be wrong. |
i might not agree with the NPT scenerio but have to ask, who mentioned lizards and how often do lizards get mentioned on this forum for you to beable to label everyone as a lizard believer? also how does believing we were lied to about 9/11 even suggest you believe in lizards, aliens ect. ect. or is this just another opertunity to exercise your ridiculing skills? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
| marky 54 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | prole art threat wrote: | | Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day. |
Yes, well, the lizards had to survey the whole of Manhattan Island and the mainland to locate all possible cameras and send out beams to affect the images they had recorded as well as exercising their mind control functions to make people think they had seen planes when they had not. With so much to do, no wonder small details like plane velocity were not perfect.
Alternatively, you could be wrong. |
i might not agree with the NPT scenerio but have to ask, who mentioned lizards and how often do lizards get mentioned on this forum for you to beable to label everyone as a lizard believer? also how does believing we were lied to about 9/11 even suggest you believe in lizards, aliens ect. ect. or is this just another opertunity to exercise your ridiculing skills? |
marky, clearly mere humans would not have the powers required to do what is needed for the no planes theory, therefore either the supernatural or alien powers are required. Perhaps not lizards, but something.
_________________
".......some partial collapse [of WTC7] would not have been suspicious......." - chek |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 8:39 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | marky 54 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | prole art threat wrote: | | Even the speed of the 'planes' vary throughout those clips. You are tripping out of your mind. Go back and take notice of the random velocity. Same 'plane', different speeds. Same *, different day. |
Yes, well, the lizards had to survey the whole of Manhattan Island and the mainland to locate all possible cameras and send out beams to affect the images they had recorded as well as exercising their mind control functions to make people think they had seen planes when they had not. With so much to do, no wonder small details like plane velocity were not perfect.
Alternatively, you could be wrong. |
i might not agree with the NPT scenerio but have to ask, who mentioned lizards and how often do lizards get mentioned on this forum for you to beable to label everyone as a lizard believer? also how does believing we were lied to about 9/11 even suggest you believe in lizards, aliens ect. ect. or is this just another opertunity to exercise your ridiculing skills? |
marky, clearly mere humans would not have the powers required to do what is needed for the no planes theory, therefore either the supernatural or alien powers are required. Perhaps not lizards, but something. |
i agree something that we are not aware of would need to be involved, however with so many secret bases and technologies, we can only guess at if mere humans could indeed pull something like that of, but from what we are aware of yes its unexplainable or not proveable NPT was possible. but critics mention lizards here more than those asking for a new investigastion, imply that you must believe in them to even question 9/11. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
What? Are the critics denying the existence of lizards now?
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
telecasterisation
Banned
Joined: 10 Sep 2006
Posts: 1873
Location: Upstairs
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 1:40 pm Post subject: Re: Footage of north tower hit shows no plane |
|
|
prole art threat
| Quote: | | Can anybody see a plane in this clip? |
Virtually every clip you hold up as proof of something is devoid of any real quality. You ask if anyone can see the supposed aircraft that is but a tiny speck off in the right hand corner?
Well, can you read the number plate of the car directly in front of the taxi we are in? Should be easy given you shout about 'no plane' being visible.
The camera to subject distance - taxi to aircraft - is considerable, the camera is hand-held, the vehicle it is in is probably moving forward too. The quality of the video is very poor, however;
Having enlarged the section that the aircraft is supposedly in and slowed it right down, yes I can see a moving blob that coincides with the explosion on the tower in question. I cannot say with any certainty it is an aircraft.
Given all the variables, your question is a highly loaded.
And the number plate of the car in front is.......?
_________________
I completely challenge the official version of events - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC -I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC - I AM NOT A 9/11 TRUTH CRITIC
Last edited by telecasterisation on Sat Dec 16, 2006 5:10 pm; edited 1 time in total |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Sat Dec 16, 2006 2:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Exactly. Then I go on to say.. "There IS a flying object in the video. So by NPT reasoning that means it must have been added - yet it's so barely visible... Why wouldn't 'they' do a better job?"
Then we both realise, if 'they' did edit the film to add a plane, they obviously did it to fit with the situation and quality of the recording. Which naturally leads NPT's to understand, that whether this video is real or fake, it would look, exactly. The. Same. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
