Dear Critics...

[prole art threat]

As you may be probably aware I started a thread in the 'General' section with a view to rationalising what it is you're doing here.

http://www.nineeleven.co.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=5816

One of the posts submitted by a Truth Movement member posted the following:

[JimB]

I love these sojourns to Planet Prole Art.

[prole art threat]

[prole art threat]

The reason I am asking is because these critics being here on a permanent basis does not make any sense. Any person who looks into this event would know that something is very wrong with the official version.
And these critics seem to know their stuff.

Their psychology is both fascinating and frightening,

[Bushwacker]

How wonderfully ironic that the link takes you to a site devoted to celebrating crop circles, and refers to the doubters who do not agree with the serious researchers into crop circles!

Quote: "Most serious researchers favor the theory that the formations are, for the most part, not being made by the human specie, and seem to be symbolic messages from an unknown, high intelligence."

I am sure that Doug Bower and Dave Chorley, who thought up the idea in a pub in Southampton, were flattered to be credited with high intellignce but a bit upset not to be thought human!

[prole art threat]

[Johnny Pixels]

Yes I admit, I am a mentalist. I have been to psychologists, psychotherapists, physiotherapists, angioplasties, you name it, I've had it. And they all planted ideas in my head. Oh the truth is out, woe is me.

You rumbled me Parole art theft.

[Bushwacker]

[prole art threat]

[IronSnot]

[Johnny Pixels]

[prole art threat]

[prole art threat]

[prole art threat]

Johnny, Bushwacker, tell us what you are doing here?

[Bushwacker]

[IronSnot]

Don't assume we're all like that, bushwhacker. And they're not the only ones who can't see the truth when it's staring them in the face.

I see JREFrs are upset that Streisand and Brolin are onboard the 911 wagon. Who's going to be the last one over do you think?

[prole art threat]

[Ignatz]

[Bushwacker]

[marky 54]

the lost and bewildered will ignore any evidence that go against their believes, this will explain why no critic ever responds to links that contridict the offical version, and in stead skip past them. at least i can admit if something looks credible or i was wrong on certain issues, critics just ignore everything that dosnt tow the offical line not so much as a comment unless it misses the point the post was trying to make.

[Bushwacker]

[marky 54]

[Below the Parapet]

[kc]

[Dogsmilk]

KC -

[kc]

I was called a Lunatic by PAT this weekend.

TBH I have no problem with people slinging insults like that around, but I find them professionally worrying coming from someone who's supposed to be working in the field with vulnerable people. In my experience its usually a sign of something slanderous I wont go into ;)

Plus its a poxy flag to wave -
"I work with the deluded so when I say your a lunatic, I'm using all my professional weight to back that up"

is two steps shy of

"I work with refugees so I'm allowed to call you foreign scum!"

BTW, according to MIND, 1 in 4 people in the UK are currently suffering some form of mental illness. More than 4 people have participated in this thread alone and I know I'm not mentally unwell as I had an eval a few months back..... ;)

[DaveyJ]

also 1 in 6 people in the world is chinese, we've got over six people in this thread.

I'd concider myself a 911 skeptic for sure, probably could be labeled as a critic too. The reason i come here is beacuse i do enjoy a good debate, and for a while geniunely believed 911 could be an inside job, but the more i looked into it, the more i found sketchy evidence at best. I know which camp i'm in, but im still open to the idea. If anyone will reveal the cover up, it'll probably be on a site like this. So i keep checking back periodoically to see if anyone has unearthed anything new. but all i see is the same recycled arugments, even though in my mind they have been thoroughly exhuasted (e/g thermate) and now the increasingly elaborate theorys, which seem to be edging into the science fiction teritory.

(any cter looking for another explanation, maybe the World Order which controls every goverment in the world and also covers up UFO landings used crashed alien technology and weaponary)

Basically, if there is so much 'evidence' that could sway the main population. Why not put it into a consice, simple film/text. Offer alternative explanations, cite reliable and refrenced sources. most importantly make it accurate beacuse thats the problem with the films i've seen the film makers are so caught up in their own bias and bizare theorys that make the actual facts seem just as made up.

like the loose change guys, i listened to radio interiview with him (Avery i think) and i did get the impression that he was mentally unstable, honestly i worried for his state of mind. He was accusing some FBI agent of being part of the conspiracy becasue his son was on one of the planes and the night before he sat him down and talked to him about the dangers of flying. I dont know a father who wouldnt do this to their child. I listened to the rest of the interview and while it was probably mediated to appear that way, i got the distinct impression he probably did have minor mental health issues.

(sorry for the long post)
________
[URL=http://www.ford-wiki.com/wiki/Ford_Maverick_(North_America)]Ford Maverick (North America) specifications[/URL]

[Gibson]

[kc]

I know a fella who was sacked from ICI R&D when they moved to a new building. Only problem is HR forgot to tell him and forgot to stop his pay. So for the next 12 years he turned up to work in an empty building, did wee experiments to keep himself amused, all the way up to his retirement date at which point he send a letter to his boss thanking him and his boss had a near heart attack cause he thought he'd sacked him over a decade ago :)

Nice blerk too :)

[telecasterisation]