London Conference to discretely Lobby

[Sinclair]

I have discovered that there is a conference in London on 10-11 November 2005, which will be attended by influential engineers etc., who I think it would be good to make aware of the anomalies of 9/11.

The conference is the 3rd International Conference on Forensic Engineering - Diagnosing Failures and Solving Problems, on 10-11 November 2005 at The Institution of Civil Engineers, One Great George Street, Westminster, London SW1P 3AA

There is a paper being presented by Dr. Mike Byfield ( contact Email: mpb@soton.ac.uk ) Prevention of progressive collapses due to terrorist attacks.

It would be good if someone in the London area could perhaps do some low key lobbying of the attendees at around 8.00am to 8.20am on Thursday 10 November 2005, prior to the conference registration at 8.30am.

If I were down there I’d do it. Please pass the word around to any 9/11 truth activists. I would be as diplomatic as possible & just give them each a copy of Loose Change & ask them to watch it.

Please post any feedback.

Sinclair

A PDF of the conference details are attached.

[Belinda]

Thanks for this, will see to it Belinda

[hampton]

feedback would be useful

[Sinclair]

Hi Belinda,

Did you or anyone else make it to By George Street for the ICE conference?

What was the reaction/feedack?

I'd be interested to know.

The recently published paper by Brigham Young University (US) physics professor Steven E. Jones is bringing the academic argument into attention. The disemination of such info & the stirring of the subject amongst the academic circles is a good way forward to widen the debate.
See http://p216.ezboard.com/frigorousintuitionfrm10.showMessage?topicID=19 11.topic for an ongoing discussion on this.

Regards,

Sinclair

[ian neal]

Great link

From that site I found

This collection of explosion quotes

and another professor

I didn't attend the event because I'm planning to approach the fire engineering community in the UK starting with those who are on record for challenging the NIST analysis, but think this is best done directly and person to person rather than publicly challenging them before their peers.