| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
 Posted: Sat Jan 13, 2007 1:33 pm Post subject: 'In Plane Sight' removed? |
 |
|
I can't see it in the listed videos on the site, has it been axed? I feel it had many merits and, as Dave vonKleist said, it only dealt in facts not theories.
Has it been established that those twin tower plane impact point (to the upper right of in both towers)visible in daylight flashes/explosions were pre or post impact and also have they established what could have caused such bright flashes/explosions? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Caz
Last Chance Saloon
Joined: 23 Apr 2006
Posts: 836
|
| Posted: Mon Jan 15, 2007 3:53 am Post subject: 'In Plane Sight' removed? |
|
|
| That's interesting. I read on the net that www.reopen911.org had been removed as well, Jimmy Walter's site. I was surprised, but I can't get to it, so maybe that's gone as well. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Stephen
Moderate Poster
Joined: 03 Jul 2006
Posts: 819
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 5:59 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Yes Bring Back the In-Plane site Video Link, Even if you don't believe in pods etc - It's still a good video  |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stephen wrote: | | Yes Bring Back the In-Plane site Video Link, Even if you don't believe in pods etc - It's still a good video |
No need to take the p!ss Lilly Savage  Where are these people coming from? putting words in my mouth?? Did I mention "pods"? The available photographic evidence suggests whatever hit the south tower did not have a standard 767 underside, yes or no? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fallious
Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006
Posts: 762
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 7:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | | stephen wrote: | | Yes Bring Back the In-Plane site Video Link, Even if you don't believe in pods etc - It's still a good video |
No need to take the p!ss Lilly Savage Where are these people coming from? putting words in my mouth?? Did I mention "pods"? The available photographic evidence suggests whatever hit the south tower did not have a standard 767 underside, yes or no? |
Did it perhaps escape your notice that he was agreeing with you, and also diffusing a potential gripe before it was more seriously addressed? If posting an opinion in a thread is putting words in your mouth, then somebody needs to reign in their ego.
So tetchy...
_________________
"Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988
|
| Posted: Tue Jan 16, 2007 8:01 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fallious wrote: | | SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | | stephen wrote: | | Yes Bring Back the In-Plane site Video Link, Even if you don't believe in pods etc - It's still a good video |
No need to take the p!ss Lilly Savage Where are these people coming from? putting words in my mouth?? Did I mention "pods"? The available photographic evidence suggests whatever hit the south tower did not have a standard 767 underside, yes or no? |
Did it perhaps escape your notice that he was agreeing with you, and also diffusing a potential gripe before it was more seriously addressed? If posting an opinion in a thread is putting words in your mouth, then somebody needs to reign in their ego.
So tetchy... |
So what is he/she/it LOL-ing at then? agreeing with me? do you have a sense of scouse irony? Did i mention "pods" first? Oh I give up! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Headhunter
Moderate Poster
Joined: 14 Feb 2006
Posts: 117
Location: Canada
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
