=> South Tower Plane. The Evidence Revealed.

[Headhunter]

http://tinyurl.com/y2qm4t

[CB_Brooklyn]

This link explains exactly what those planes were:

http://911researchers.com/node/98

[Headhunter]

Video fakery? You've got to be kidding!

[CB_Brooklyn]

[Headhunter]

First it will penetrate. Ever seen what projectiles will do in a tornado or hurricane, and in this case, were talking much much larger mass, much higher speed, and therefore much greater inertia.

Full speed CNN impact video
http://www.letsroll911.net/images/CNN-2ndTowerStrike-Pod-Missile-Sound -4.6meg.MPG

Here is what a mere splinter of wood can do to a concrete (possibly granite?) wall.



Second, were all the anomalies I pointed out (from multiple cameras and angles) in that presentation given in the OP "CGI'd" in? Gimme a break!

Where do you people come from, the Webfarian school of "video fakery"?

I know the no plane meme is hard to shake once it finds it's way into your frontal lobe, but please, step back and re-think it all the way through.

[marky 54]

[Headhunter]

marky 54, what are your thoughts on the linked presentation offered in the original post?

[marky 54]

[marky 54]

[Headhunter]

[marky 54]

intresting indeed if the data is accurate. why is it in the controversies section if it can prove the plane wasnt flight 175? planes hit the towers but that dosnt mean it had to be the flights in question if it can be proved to be the case.

has this post been mistaken for a no planer? i think it holds some important information if all the sources are credible. i think it needs more research though just to show more clearly the case it was trying to prove.

[Headhunter]

I'm the one who put it together as a distillation of over three years of collaborative research. It's about as good as it gets. What I believe it shows, rather conclusively, is that the south tower plane was NOT flight 175, but WAS in fact some sort of Military variant of the Boeing 767 commercial airliner, and almost certainly, a Tanker plane, with additional capabilities through further re-engineering. It's concievable that such an aircraft was already in the arsenal of the USAF (though JUST, as the Boeing Tanker development cycle was initiated not too long prior to 9/11). I believe an accounting shell game was employed at the Pentagon to make one disappear, and that it was further reconfigured specifically for the 9/11 task at hand.

Think "Operation Northwoods" though in this case much much more advanced and complex. We're talking very high precision military aviation and explosives (FAE - fuel air explosive) technology being employed - a lot of work for a pyrotechnic shock and awe theatrical display, though absolutely essential to the script in terms of the fake cause and misdirection regarding the total destruction of the Twin Towers an hour or so later.

Think: What was the one video image played over and over again, aside from the Twin Towers destruction, on 9/11? And what was to be the prima face cause, employing the magical art of misdirection?



Now THAT, is one HELL of a fireball!

[marky 54]

[marky 54]

911evidencebase.co.uk

also it might be worth posting here under evidence submissions

[Headhunter]

Will do. Thank you BTW, for taking the time to review the information, and please, if you feel it has merit, pass the tinyurl link around for it.
I want to get the views up in the 1000's for that presentation.

It's high time to take another look at the south tower plane, to analyze it's true purpose and nature, particularly in light of proof of CD of the Twin Towers.

Aside from the broad daylight destruction of the Twin Towers themselves, it is the single most recorded event of 9/11, and yet it remains largely unexamined, since everyone simply ASSUMES that that part of the story is correct, based on what we THINK we saw (Flight 175 hitting the south tower).

Again, please post that little link anywhere you please. Thanks again!

http://tinyurl.com/y2qm4t

See here's the thing. The official story involves a simplistic trick involving Occam's Razor, along the lines of "the planes hit (we all saw them hit) and then the towers fell". However, if it can be shown that the plane that hit the south tower was NOT in fact, the original flight 175, then even THAT false premise falls completely apart at the seems. This is the genious of letsroll911's continued advocacy for this evidence in the face of some very staunch opposition, employing the label of "pod" and even going so far as to posit the "no plane" nonsense theories. Anything, to hide and to obscure what is "in plain sight".

I believe it's the missing piece in the 9/11 puzzle, tying the south tower impact, to the 9/11 War Games Operations under way that day, involving the use of LIVE FLY, simulated hijacked aircraft being flown as missiles into landmark buildings, ON 9/11.

You see, if you've got the buildings all wired up and ready to "fall down", and if this feat of demolition engineering requires the plane impacts to be successful (plausible)... well, you get the picture. There could be NO MISTAKES and no room for error. The whole operation was an "all or nothing" proposition.

Best,

Robert Rice
Headhunter

[rodin]

http://tinyurl.com/y2qm4t

Good work. I am not sure about the ordnance flash as plane hits wall - was that definitely before impact? It does look like something other than reflected sunlight. It is present on more than 1 camera so cannot be an articfact.

This should be posted in the main 911 Articles section right away IMO

Following the pilots for truth video I am leaning heavily towards a plane swap MO. I was already that way inclined after establishing Israeli presence among the hijackers - they would not willingly go to their deaths I think.

To recap - Israeli agents were on at least two of the planes. One of the hijackers had an Israeli accent.

Go Google.

[rodin]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[CB_Brooklyn]

Further Proof of a CGI:


Look between the left engine and fuselage


The building self-heals itself !

[Headhunter]

Are familiar with various types of photographic effects involving high speed video capture? That's what the "NPT" BS is all about really, and it's amazing how inept some of the "researchers" are.

Full speed CNN impact video
http://www.letsroll911.net/images/CNN-2ndTowerStrike-Pod-Missile-Sound -4.6meg.MPG

[CB_Brooklyn]

[rodin]

@ Headhunter

http://www.contrarianthinker.com/911.htm

@ Brooklyn

You are as persistent as you are wrong. For the last time I will answer you. If there was an ignore function you'd be first on the list.

The heavier parts of the plane did break steel columns. The wingtips did not, but they did break glass and dislodge aluminium cladding panels. Photos of the gash in the building clearly show it was made from something coming in, not an explosion. You will waste no more of my time from now on other than that time it takes to scroll quickly by any of your drivel. Goodbye.

[CB_Brooklyn]

[Headhunter]

[marky 54]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[CB_Brooklyn]

[marky 54]

[CB_Brooklyn]