Niiiice... but what's this got to do with 9/11? _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
'Waaaah, planes can glide through steel and concrete like bars of soap through bath water."
Silly, ignorant b-astard.
So prove it, stop posting irrelevant turds and demonstrate the impossibility of planes entering the twin towers with straightforward mathematics.
If you are right then the numbers will reflect that and then everyone, - EVERYONE - in the movement would accept that no planes were there and this whole thing would be done and dusted. But you can't can you?
And it never will be. So it'll remain disinfo, peddled by a vocal minority of abusive half-wits.
Now, you were explaining what relevance holograms have to a 9/11 truth forum? _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
'Waaaah, planes can glide through steel and concrete like bars of soap through bath water."
Silly, ignorant b-astard.
So prove it, stop posting irrelevant turds and demonstrate the impossibility of planes entering the twin towers with straightforward mathematics.
If you are right then the numbers will reflect that and then everyone, - EVERYONE - in the movement would accept that no planes were there and this whole thing would be done and dusted. But you can't can you?
And it never will be. So it'll remain disinfo, peddled by a vocal minority of abusive half-wits.
Now, you were explaining what relevance holograms have to a 9/11 truth forum?
I already proved TV-Fakery using basic Laws of Physics. But you are incapable of understanding it, which is your problem.
So nothing at all hit the buildings then, is that what you are saying? That ALL images and videos, ALL OF THEM, were "CGI'd" or photoshopped? All the eyewitnesses, who saw planes, and there are many, government plants, is that it? The impact gashes, faked with highly sopphisticated shaped charges? C'mon. Is that what you are saying? _________________ Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush
I have never heard of a hologram that exists in open space- they are all in controlled spaces with multiple projectors.
I am sick of this "we are twenty years behind in knowledge of technology", well lets just use that argument for everything and say george bush is an android, the twin towers were eaten at free fall speed by termites made of invisible energy and all the witnesses who saw planes on 9/11 were holographic projections and the US government secretly banned the thousands of personal video cameras owned in New York so that they could fake all the ameteur footage as well.
PLEASE! You all know (or should) that in modern culture everyone with a camcorder runs out side and turns it on to get footage meaning the "CGI" argument is defunct. And as for holograms- we don't even know that technology exists. Finally, I have noticed recently that the "invisible" parts of the plane, in clear photos, are precisely the part of the plane which are in shadow. And due to colouring of the planes the shadow is a very similar colour and tone to the towers behind it, meaning on a digital camera with limited pixels it could quite practically appear to disappear.
Really look at the photos- no part of the plane which is not in shadow disappears at any point.
_________________
Peace and Truth
Last edited by Stefan on Sun Jan 21, 2007 1:42 pm; edited 1 time in total
'Waaaah, planes can glide through steel and concrete like bars of soap through bath water."
Silly, ignorant b-astard.
So prove it, stop posting irrelevant turds and demonstrate the impossibility of planes entering the twin towers with straightforward mathematics.
If you are right then the numbers will reflect that and then everyone, - EVERYONE - in the movement would accept that no planes were there and this whole thing would be done and dusted. But you can't can you?
And it never will be. So it'll remain disinfo, peddled by a vocal minority of abusive half-wits.
Now, you were explaining what relevance holograms have to a 9/11 truth forum?
I think you will find the numbers are growing and you are going to look like a prize vegetable.
So nothing at all hit the buildings then, is that what you are saying? That ALL images and videos, ALL OF THEM, were "CGI'd" or photoshopped? All the eyewitnesses, who saw planes, and there are many, government plants, is that it? The impact gashes, faked with highly sopphisticated shaped charges? C'mon. Is that what you are saying?
I have never heard of a hologram that exists in open space- they are all in controlled spaces with multiple projectors.
I am sick of this "we are twenty years behind in knowledge of technology", well lets just use that argument for everything and say george bush is an android, the twin towers were eaten at free fall speed by termites made of invisible energy and all the witnesses who saw planes on 9/11 were holographic projections and the US government secretly banned the thousands of personal video cameras owned in New York so that they could fake all the ameteur footage as well.
PLEASE! You all know (or should) that in modern culture everyone with a camcorder runs out side and turns it on to get footage meaning the "CGI" argument is defunct. And as for holograms- we don't even know that technology exists. Finally, I have noticed recently that the "invisible" parts of the plane, in clear photos, are precisely the part of the plane which are in shadow. And due to colouring of the planes the shadow is a very similar colour and tone to the towers behind it, meaning on a digital camera with limited pixels it could quite practically appear to disappear.
Really look at the photos- no part of the plane which is not in shadow disappears at any point.
There were plenty of orbs in 'plane' sight that day. Go and research it.
Like I say: 'Waaaaaaah, planes gliding through buildings like bars of soap through bath water'.
'Thick-ism' is another tag I like to label you PLANE THUGS with.
Thought Crime-
So your assertation IS that all camcorders owned in New York were secretly confiscated on the 10th of September and "agents" sent out to get some pre CGI ameteaur footage? _________________
Thought Crime-
So your assertation IS that all camcorders owned in New York were secretly confiscated on the 10th of September and "agents" sent out to get some pre CGI ameteaur footage?
There is very little footage. Please don't try and tell me that you have access to footage I haven't.
There is amateur footage I have seen that captures no planes whatsoever.
I saw amature footage recorded from inside an appartment, where the girl says "what's that other plane doing?". It's somewhere on Google Video. Wish I could locate it right now. And there's a bunch of them in the Camera planet collection of amature footage. Let me go get one. _________________ Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush
Thought Crime-
So your assertation IS that all camcorders owned in New York were secretly confiscated on the 10th of September and "agents" sent out to get some pre CGI ameteaur footage?
There is very little footage. Please don't try and tell me that you have access to footage I haven't.
There is amateur footage I have seen that captures no planes whatsoever.
Lets see it. _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
I saw amature footage recorded from inside an appartment, where the girl says "what's that other plane doing?". It's somewhere on Google Video. Wish I could locate it right now. And there's a bunch of them in the Camera planet collection of amature footage. Let me go get one.
You are confused , any footage which does show a plane is a plant! Any footage which, quite reasonably doesn't, Is proof of no planes!
Just a friendly reminder, i've still not seen the mathematical proof for no planes. Like I say, it's not difficulty to produce and doing so would end the argument. So whats stopping you from showing it? _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
Last edited by Fallious on Sun Jan 21, 2007 2:20 pm; edited 1 time in total
What are you talking about. There's a poorly focused plane in that video, and why did they turn and look up, was it an auditory hologram travelling through the air above them? C'mon, what's WITH this eh? Nuts! _________________ Everybody's Gotta Learn Sometime
“We will export death and violence to the four corners of the earth.” - George W. Bush
The Naudet video is an excellent demonstration of your incompetence - in the high resolution raw footage the plane is perfectly visible. Yet, as expected, in the low res blocky youtube video the plane is nearly blurred out of existence.
And the same with the second video you post, which actually does show a large object moving toward the towers right before the explosion.
Better luck next time eh? _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
What are you talking about. There's a poorly focused plane in that video, and why did they turn and look up, was it an auditory hologram travelling through the air above them? C'mon, what's WITH this eh? Nuts!
There is NO plane on there. There is a missile but NO plane.
The Naudet video is an excellent demonstration of your incompetence - in the high resolution raw footage the plane is perfectly visible. Yet, as expected, in the low res blocky youtube video the plane is nearly blurred out of existence.
And the same with the second video you post, which actually does show a large object moving toward the towers right before the explosion.
Better luck next time eh?
Shows a 'large object', does it? Not a plane, then?
The Naudet video is an excellent demonstration of your incompetence - in the high resolution raw footage the plane is perfectly visible. Yet, as expected, in the low res blocky youtube video the plane is nearly blurred out of existence.
And the same with the second video you post, which actually does show a large object moving toward the towers right before the explosion.
Better luck next time eh?
Shows a 'large object', does it? Not a plane, then?
Oh my, you are so smart! Heavens above, I had no idea you'd pick up on that. I say 'large object' because, unlike you, I don't have a prescribed agenda. I'm searching for the truth, and that means I represent evidence fairly.
Therefore, when I see a large object heading for the second tower in that video, I give you the benefit of the doubt and I call it a large object. Even though there is a wealth of evidence that it's a plane.
But you see nothing, and call it a missile. Interesting. _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
News reporter: "It just disappears, it disappeared like a bad special effect, it disappeared right into the building. I have seen it six or seven times now and it is still incomprehensible what is actually happening there."
Witness "I just saw the entire, err.. top part of the world trade centre explode, so err, I turned on the tv and when I heard they said it was a plane it was really strange"
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
, any footage which does show a plane is a plant! Any footage which, quite reasonably doesn't, Is proof of no planes!
