FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

Bush, Reid, Bullying-Manner: Lies, you keep telling lies....

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Fri Jan 26, 2007 9:38 pm    Post subject: Bush, Reid, Bullying-Manner: Lies, you keep telling lies.... Reply with quote

Bush Speech Terror Claim Debunked A Year Ago

Just one of many State of the Union lies, following in the tradition of the 2003 yellowcake fraud, Bush commits an impeachable offense by knowingly lying to the American people

Paul Joseph Watson
Prison Planet
Wednesday, January 24, 2007

A claim made by President Bush in his State of the Union speech last night, that an attack on an L.A. skyscraper had been averted, was universally debunked as a hoax by Mayors, CIA, FBI and NSA personnel and counter-terror experts nearly a year ago when it first surfaced. By regurgitating this fraud, Bush has committed an impeachable offense by knowingly lying to the American people.

Bush's address was punctuated with deception, horse hockey and propagandistic drivel throughout, again reinforcing a characteristic that was born in 2003 when Bush told the nation that Iraq had sought to buy uranium from Niger, a claim the CIA had informed the administration was based on falsified documents ten months before it was included in the speech.

Amidst the cacophony of bullshlt came this belter.

"We stopped an al Qaeda plot to fly a hijacked airplane into the tallest building on the West Coast."

According to numerous public officials, terror experts and intelligence personnel, this is simply not true.

http://www.prisonplanet.com/articles/january2007/240107terrorclaim.htm

=========================

Very similar to this, right here in the UK.

Herr Gruppenfuhrer John Reid on 13.8.6 wrote:
Mr Reid also said the government believes the first al-Qaeda plot in the UK was in 2000 in Birmingham, preceding the war in Iraq and the 9/11 attacks.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/uk/4788101.stm

You are either lying Johnny boy or you're being fed manure me old china. So, come on tell us, which is it ?

and this:

Dame Elies-r Bullying Manner on 9.11.6 wrote:
We now know that the first Al-Qaida-related plot against the UK was the one we discovered and disrupted in November 2000 in Birmingham. A British citizen is currently serving a long prison sentence for plotting to detonate a large bomb in the UK. Let there be no doubt about this: the international terrorist threat to this country is not new. It began before Iraq, before Afghanistan, and before 9/11.


That's worth repeating.

Dame Elies-r Bullying Manner on 9.11.6 wrote:
Let there be no doubt about this: the international terrorist threat to this country is not new. It began before Iraq, before Afghanistan, and before 9/11.


http://www.mi5.gov.uk/output/Page568.html

So, the clear message from the pair of them, to all those wagging fingers of doubt, is, that the threat was there before we invaded a sovereign country, on intelligence that was made to fit the policy of pre-emptive, do as we're told war, and before we started murdering hundreds of thousands of innocent human beings.

The message is, it's got nothing to do with what we have done in Iraq or elsewhere because we had our first Al Qaeda case in Birmingham back in 2000, for which we locked up another unsuspecting patsy for 20 years.

They attacked us first, before 9/11, before Afghanistan and before Iraq. They hit us first, ner-ner na-ner-ner.

In your private, unaccountable insecurity bubble, I guess it began whenever you tell us it did right. That's the way you guys work isn't it. You make your own reality and expect us to swallow it.

But that doesn't make it true now does it Lizzie. That doesn't make you a Home Secretary now does it Johnny boy. Feeding us your rubbish just makes you out for the deceivers that you are, now doesn't it. Clear, for all to see.

Perhaps you expect us all to forget what was said about that little "event" in Birmingham back in 2000 eh ?

You know, the one when MI5 started their operation, I mean surveillance, on 9.11.2000 A bit like your speech eh Lizzie, 6 years later on 9.11.6 at Queen Mary's.

I expect you don't realise that your complicit little media whores won't even have the inclination to reference your claims, and therefore everybody else will just have to take you at your word. Whatever that is.

Well, let's remind the good people of the UK shall we. You know, the ones you claim to be protecting.

Let's have a look at what your media were printing about your little operation, back in 2002, when the November 2000 operation came to trial.

The BBC wrote:
The court was told there was no indication that the men, both of Bangladeshi origin, were part of a terrorist organisation.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1766233.stm


The BBC wrote:
At a news conference Assistant Chief Constable Chris Sims, of West Midlands police, said officers had so far ruled out any connection between Abedin and known terrorist organisations. We are continuing to investigate his (Abedin's) activities - it does not end here. It has never been clear what the target or targets that were being aimed at were. We will continue to liaise with other agencies in this country, and if necessary, abroad, to see if more intelligence links can be established.


http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/england/1845534.stm


Remember these men were arrested before 9/11 and held for trial until after the new Al Qaeda, airborne terror threat was firmly entrenched in our minds. Yet, even then, they felt no need to persuade us that the accused had anything to do with international terrorism. They couldn't even tell us what their targets were.

Fast forward 4 years, to the hilarious liquid bomb plot that hardly any of the British public believed.

Up pops Reid, 3 days later saying that the Birmingham stitch up was in fact our first Al Qaeda attack.

Brilliant.

They pull out the joker just when they're credibility finally hits the floor.

And that was the point of it. A pre 9/11, pre War on Terror, backstop, to be pulled out of the hat just when it suited them to prove to us all that the threat was already there.

They could have told us this in 2002, 2003, 2004, or 2005. But no, they reserved the right to reveal that little nugget, right at the time when we needed reassuring that the Al Q threat in the UK pre-existed Iraq and the false flag rubbish that was the Heathrow liquid baby milk fiasco.

Lies, you keep telling lies every single day.

_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> General All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You cannot attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group