View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
ComfortablyNumb Minor Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 86 Location: Flintshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 12:41 pm Post subject: No one witness the planes? |
|
|
After wasting so much bandwidth on YouTube 'evidence' and careful edge enhancement of highly compressed video to show that 175 was a cartoon. I have to ask the question, did no one see 175 hit the South Tower with their own eyes.
Well I know of at least one.
Stanley Praimnath. He was on the 81st floor of the South Tower.
Here is a passage from his own website
Quote: | "Suddenly I see this big gray airplane with red letters on the wing and tail filling my window," Praimnath says. "It’s coming right at me."
Praimnath drops the phone and tucks under his desk in a fetal position as the plane obliterates the wall. The impact is a prolonged, gut-wrenching screech, a hideous, metallic roar. "It sounded like a huge steel cage being ripped apart," Praimnath recalls. Intense smoke and soot punctuate the agonizing explosion.
Then silence.
A flame interrupts the awful blackness, revealing a protruding aircraft wing blocking the exit only 20 feet away. I’m going to die, Praimnath thinks. Yet he cries out to God.
"Lord, help me," he prays, trying to stand. "I can’t do this by myself. I don’t want to die. I want to see my two little girls." Tears spill from squinting eyes as he realizes he is buried shoulder deep in debris. A nail pierces his right hand. Pain sears his body. |
http://stanleypraimnath.com/1.htm
Lets be frank now. Either he's telling the truth or he's a liar.
No doubt he was a 'spook' whose doing his job. Except if it wasn’t for Brian Clark, Stanley would be dead now. Of course Brian was also a 'spook' planted in advance to cover Stanley's back.
The other idea is to go for the simplest path and accept his testimony.
What's it going to be?
Regs,
Numb
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
13.67 KB |
Viewed: |
311 Time(s) |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
72.2 KB |
Viewed: |
274 Time(s) |
|
Description: |
|
Filesize: |
12.38 KB |
Viewed: |
300 Time(s) |
|
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Thermate Angel - now passed away
Joined: 13 Nov 2006 Posts: 445
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:12 pm Post subject: Re: No one witness the planes? |
|
|
ComfortablyNumb wrote: | What's it going to be? |
Heheh, I don't know why people bother wasting time trying to show NPT'ers they're wrong. They never, ever, listen. There's a reason for that, they don't even believe it themselves....
_________________ Make love, not money. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:18 pm Post subject: Re: No one witness the planes? |
|
|
Thermate wrote: | I don't know why people bother wasting time trying to show NPT'ers they're wrong. |
They're not wrong they're shills and liars.
_________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
ComfortablyNumb Minor Poster
Joined: 14 Sep 2006 Posts: 86 Location: Flintshire
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 1:19 pm Post subject: Re: No one witness the planes? |
|
|
Thermate wrote: | Heheh, I don't know why people bother wasting time trying to show NPT'ers they're wrong. They never, ever, listen. There's a reason for that, they don't even believe it themselves.... |
I know, I know. Ya just get sucked in!
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Tue Jan 30, 2007 7:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
well it looks like ignoring it is enough to debunk it.
and then they wonder why we scream from the roof tops.
"PROVE NPT IS TRUE AND STOP RECYCLING DISINFO PLANTED TO CAUSE WHAT IS HAPPENING AND ANSWER THE QUESTIONS"!.
nope instead lets ignore that pretend it dosnt exsist, just like critics corner when that was a busy place. they dont understand we just want it explained and if they are convincing and prove it we start to listen ignoring our points dosnt prove npt to be true infact it proves the opposite.
and we all end up wasting our time giving then time to explain.
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
|