i see his point hes making, he said he can prove no boings hit the towers he used an example about the plane being as wide and long as the building. the plane flys in with no aircraft parts falling of, and then it came to a complete standstill inside the building. now this sounds unbelievable a plane can do that now can somebody prove it?
you see what he said makes it sound impossible a plane can do that but with the speed it was traveling and many other factors im not sure it is unless it can be shown it is impossible sceintifically. i aint likely to abandon the plane theory(which i think is the safest theory incase people are wrong) for another theory untill it can be shown convincingly.
youtube videos just dont do it for me unless its something like you just posted that is presented in a way you can understand each point made and can tackle it and debate it if there are points you see need ferther answers.
however, untill this post i was still waiting whilst giving npt'ers a chance to prove there case which none seem intrested in so far. if you have anymore information on this that you think can prove npt please post it. your the only one posting stuff that argues your case and is not a 20 second clip with a three word explaination.
if morgan reynolds has proof is this available to see?
i hope other npt'ers use this thread as an example of what is needed for people to listen, and use 20 second clips with their proof rather than the 20 second clips being their whole case everytime they post.
you show intrest and questions to understand better ect, but again nothing. not even a no marky we dont have that evidence yet or we are still working on that, instead just nothing from people claiming to have all the proof. why carnt we see it? how are we expected to believe something we cannot see?
you show intrest and questions to understand better ect, but again nothing. not even a no marky we dont have that evidence yet or we are still working on that, instead just nothing from people claiming to have all the proof. why carnt we see it? how are we expected to believe something we cannot see?
Mark, I think you are missing the basic evidence. Please review this evidence and see what you make of it:
None of us have access to forensic evidence, so the next thing we have are photographs and video and eyewitness testimony. For something as obvious as planes hitting buildings, there should be NO ANOMALIES in the evidence. As I have posted many times, there are aspects of evidence which raise SERIOUS questions about the plane stories. These questions are based on science and physics - which are not open to question in quite the same way as witness testimonies are.
i.e. if you have a dead body with a bullet hole in it and someone says "I clubbed him to death", but there is no head wound, you know the witness is lying. _________________ Andrew
you show intrest and questions to understand better ect, but again nothing. not even a no marky we dont have that evidence yet or we are still working on that, instead just nothing from people claiming to have all the proof. why carnt we see it? how are we expected to believe something we cannot see?
Mark, I think you are missing the basic evidence. Please review this evidence and see what you make of it:
None of us have access to forensic evidence, so the next thing we have are photographs and video and eyewitness testimony. For something as obvious as planes hitting buildings, there should be NO ANOMALIES in the evidence. As I have posted many times, there are aspects of evidence which raise SERIOUS questions about the plane stories. These questions are based on science and physics - which are not open to question in quite the same way as witness testimonies are.
i.e. if you have a dead body with a bullet hole in it and someone says "I clubbed him to death", but there is no head wound, you know the witness is lying.
Andrew you're not suggesting that aircraft didn't hit the twin towers are you?
I'm just going to call a NewYorker who has often told me that he has heard from many people that they saw Big Boeing's flying low over NY towards Manhattan on the morning of 911. Were talking thousands of people.
So Andrew yes or no did aircraft impact the twin towers? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
ok this looks better, ive kept a record of the webpage so i can check it anytime. its hard for me to see it this way at the moment but i have only had a quick glance for now but will read and study it, even if i dont end up fully understanding it it bets put together youtube vids by miles so thanks for providing it.
Andrew, can you spot any inaccuracies in Morgans paper, relating to NPT? _________________ "Thought is faster than arrows, and truth is sharper than blades." - David Gemmell | RealityDown wiki
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
