View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:11 pm Post subject: Scott Forbes evidence is uncorroborated |
|
|
It's interesting that I never questioned this before but has anybody come across even one other person that confirms the south tower power-down?
Read this: http://911review.com/errors/wtc/forbes.html
Backup copy: http://www.esnips.com/doc/437e026a-bb4a-441d-b94c-5e31177c2bfe
If Forbes statements can't be backed up then it can no longer be seen as evidence. Further we have to question the “911 Mysteries” documentary as you would think the makers would have triple checked all their sources. That particular documentary strongly tries to implement Bush and the government in the events of 911. Remember the FEMA terror drills if known to terrorists etc would have been an obvious opportunity to maximize confusing whilst executing an attack.
This Forbes stuff has instilled many doubts in my mind. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
marky 54 Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006 Posts: 3293
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
would willie rodriguez know?
ive done a search and am seeing nothing other than scott forbes, other places/things that mention the power down dont seem to give a source for the information they are claiming. so we have to assume again they are getting the information from scott forbes statements. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1219
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:32 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patrick,
Why don't you ask him, instead of all these public attacks? _________________
Peace and Truth |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Stefan wrote: | Patrick,
Why don't you ask him, instead of all these public attacks? |
Sorry no attack here. Just that I would expect a few hundred if not thousands of witness statements confirming the power-down yet they don't seem to exist.
This section on the "911 Review" site is worth reading: http://911review.com/errors/index.html _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Snowygrouch Validated Poster
Joined: 02 Apr 2006 Posts: 628 Location: Oxford
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 5:42 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I dont know for certain that Scott Forbes is correct, however he has gone on tape stating this (so you can see his face obviously).
If he made it all up thats a hell of a risk!!
For example he states the company he worked for, if he didnt all it would take would be one employee to say "hey he never worked here!!!"
Same for the power down, a pretty bold lie to make....the number of people who escaped...if thats a lie it would also just take one person to come forward saying "there were NO powerdowns!".
That doesnt make it gospel but its a big lie to try and pull off; with no drastically good motive for doing so.
C. _________________ The potential for the disastrous rise of misplaced power exists, and will persist
President Eisenhower 1961 |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The power-down if it happened is very suspicious and points to an inside job of some kind. But why
didn't Forbes mention it before April 2004? He may have been threatened into telling the story of course. The Forbes story is also used in the “911 Mysteries” documentary which blatantly points the finger at Bush and the government. Remember the FEMA terror drill was an ideal smoke screen for anybody that may have knew or found out about it prior to the event.
Forbes email:
Code: | From: "Scott Forbes" <scottforbes2002@hotmail.com>
To: skylax@comcast.net
Subject: Official Ver[si]on of 9/11 - new info
Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2004 12:35:12 +0000
To John Kaminski,
I was pleased to read your article "The Official Version of 9/11 is a Hoax"
... Please note some other facts. My name is Scott Forbes and I still work
for Fiduciary Trust. In 2001 we occupied floors 90 and 94-97 of the South
Tower and lost 87 employees plus many contractors.
On the weekend of 9/8,9/9 there was a 'power down' condition in WTC tower 2,
the south tower. This power down condition meant there was no electrical
supply for approx 36hrs from floor 50 up. I am aware of this situation since
I work in IT and had to work with many others that weekend to ensure that
all systems were cleanly shutdown beforehand ... and then brough[t] back up
afterwards. The reason given by the WTC for the power down was that cabling
in the tower was being upgraded ... Of course without power there were no
security cameras, no security locks on doors and many, many 'engineers'
coming in and out of the tower. I was at home on the morning of 9/11 on the
shore of Jersey City, right opposite the Towers, and watching events unfold
I was convinced immediately that something was happening related to the
weekend work ...
I have mailed this information to many people and bodies, including the 9/11
Commission but no-one seems to be taking and registering these facts. Whats
to hide? Can you help publicise them?
Please feel free to mail me.
Scott Forbes
|
Source: http://911review.com/errors/wtc/forbes.html _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DDD911 Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 72 Location: UK, Essex
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:09 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Has anyone asked Fiduciary Trust if he was an employee during those dates?
Simple question could make or break a story. _________________ In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act: George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 988
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:25 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is this "claim" featured in 'Screw 9/11 Mysteries' |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:36 pm Post subject: |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL wrote: | Is this "claim" featured in 'Screw 9/11 Mysteries' |
Not sure as I never got around to watching it all. It's pretty long. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Stefan Banned
Joined: 29 Aug 2006 Posts: 1219
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure everyone here has been in a position, at work or otherwise where something very wrong or suspicious has happened and it is greeted by a general silence- no one wants to rock the boat.
Some will whisper amongst them selves, some will just ignore it and keep their heads down, some will shrug and say "what can you do about it" but you will find one rare charecter, perhaps one in a thousand who will stand up and make a fuss about it, everyone else just lets someone else worry and thinks about their own neck.
In my experience 1 in 1000 is about the right proportion of the population who have a strong enough moral back bone to risk their personal situation for what they believe is right.
Think about it- are we going to start believeing Kevin Ryan was the only employee of any of UL's companies who smelt a rat? How many spoke out?
Are we saying Jones is the only physicist to have noticed something seriously fishy going on. No; just the only willing to risk his reputation for what he thought was right.
Was Sibel Edmunds the only one in the FBI who knew about the irregularities going on?
Were Annie and David the only people in the whole of MI5 to have caught wind of illegal activities?
Of course not. The lone whistleblower phenomonem only points to a sad fact of human nature:
Very few people are willing to rsik their comfort zone for the sake of something like morality. _________________
Peace and Truth
Last edited by Stefan on Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:48 am; edited 1 time in total |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 6:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
That's all very well Stefan but without other witness statements Forbes words mean nothing. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
QuitTheirClogs Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 09 Feb 2007 Posts: 630 Location: Manchester
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
SHERITON HOTEL Moderate Poster
Joined: 18 Jun 2006 Posts: 988
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 7:08 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Was there anything about the pre 9/11 weekend twin towers 'power down' in the 911 commission report and who were the 'computer upgrade contactors'? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Bongo 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 17 Jan 2007 Posts: 687
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 8:24 pm Post subject: |
|
|
William Rodriguez stated that regular power-downs were not that uncommon and infact quite normal at the Glasgow event last Saturday evening. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 9:07 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Bongo wrote: | William Rodriguez stated that regular power-downs were not that uncommon and infact quite normal at the Glasgow event last Saturday evening. |
That's not what Forbes said. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
DDD911 Minor Poster
Joined: 23 Jun 2006 Posts: 72 Location: UK, Essex
|
Posted: Thu Feb 15, 2007 11:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patrick Brown wrote: | Bongo wrote: | William Rodriguez stated that regular power-downs were not that uncommon and infact quite normal at the Glasgow event last Saturday evening. |
That's not what Forbes said. |
William Rodriguez should know more about power downs anyway, I would take the word of someone like him who works behind the scenes to know what’s going on, Rodriguez had worked at the WTC for quite some time.
Again a simple phone call to Fiduciary Trust should at least confirm he actually worked there, nothing sinister just confirming he worked there prior to 9/11 & no one is asking for personal information, people don’t bite when you ask them simple questions, if you want to confirm a story at least confirm the guy actually worked there. Journalists don’t hold any magical powers they are just skin n bone like the rest of us, they chase leads, use telephones ect.
Personally I thought his radio interviews sounded quite normal and on the level, just another Joe wanting answers, and happened to work there.
At the end of the day the building owners could do whatever they wanted to during off hours & possibly daytimes as well, with all the people coming in and out of that place & with unrestricted access I bet you could easily plant the devices needed to slice that steel, and take your time doing it. _________________ In a time of universal deceit telling the truth is a revolutionary act: George Orwell |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006 Posts: 1616
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
I'm sure I remember reading something about how Forbes got a couple of former colleagues to corroborate his story for an interviewer, but I can't for the life of me remember where this was or what specific interview.
Though his statement in isolation is unsatisfactory as evidence, I find myself thinking if he wasn't who he said he was or had otherwise been totally discredited, this would have been trumpeted by critics quite loudly. I'm not aware of this happening. _________________ It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
Back to top |
|
|
paul wright Moderator
Joined: 26 Sep 2005 Posts: 2650 Location: Sunny Bradford, Northern Lights
|
Posted: Fri Feb 16, 2007 12:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dogsmilk wrote: | I'm sure I remember reading something about how Forbes got a couple of former colleagues to corroborate his story for an interviewer, but I can't for the life of me remember where this was or what specific interview.
Though his statement in isolation is unsatisfactory as evidence, I find myself thinking if he wasn't who he said he was or had otherwise been totally discredited, this would have been trumpeted by critics quite loudly. I'm not aware of this happening. |
Precisely dogsmilk. That is why I posted to one of PB's threads that the Forbes theory is most unlikely, and why the conventional explosives demolition theory is incorrect. That's the point PB switched it to this thread.
While there were undoubtedly explosions in the basement and no doubt explosions all over the place, none of these, notwithstanding the theoretical plane hits were enough to pulverise steel concrete and human flesh in this particular fashion. There has to be another element in the demolitions
The lone Forbes explanation is a loser from start to finish - number 1 to 1 _________________ http://www.exopolitics-leeds.co.uk/introduction |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:35 am Post subject: |
|
|
dh wrote: | Dogsmilk wrote: | I'm sure I remember reading something about how Forbes got a couple of former colleagues to corroborate his story for an interviewer, but I can't for the life of me remember where this was or what specific interview.
Though his statement in isolation is unsatisfactory as evidence, I find myself thinking if he wasn't who he said he was or had otherwise been totally discredited, this would have been trumpeted by critics quite loudly. I'm not aware of this happening. |
Precisely dogsmilk. That is why I posted to one of PB's threads that the Forbes theory is most unlikely, and why the conventional explosives demolition theory is incorrect. That's the point PB switched it to this thread.
While there were undoubtedly explosions in the basement and no doubt explosions all over the place, none of these, notwithstanding the theoretical plane hits were enough to pulverise steel concrete and human flesh in this particular fashion. There has to be another element in the demolitions
The lone Forbes explanation is a loser from start to finish - number 1 to 1 |
I see where you're coming from!
Please go back there. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 9:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
Dogsmilk wrote: | I'm sure I remember reading something about how Forbes got a couple of former colleagues to corroborate his story for an interviewer, but I can't for the life of me remember where this was or what specific interview.
Though his statement in isolation is unsatisfactory as evidence, I find myself thinking if he wasn't who he said he was or had otherwise been totally discredited, this would have been trumpeted by critics quite loudly. I'm not aware of this happening. |
I agree with your analysis, but we need more if the power-down story is to become rock-hard evidence. One more thread for the debating chamber. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:20 am Post subject: Re: Scott Forbes evidence is uncorroborated |
|
|
Patrick Brown wrote: |
This Forbes stuff has instilled many doubts in my mind. |
I don't think so PB.
The evidence shows that critical thinking/rational discernment is not your thing.
Spell out these many doubts PB. Some of us would like to see more clearly where you are coming from. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 10:29 am Post subject: |
|
|
Would not Rodriguez know if there had been a power-down? _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234 wrote: | Spell out these many doubts PB. |
Err what's the title of this thread? Also if Forbes statement/evidence is uncorroborated how much of the other anecdotal evidence, that appears in documentaries such as “911 Mysteries”, is uncorroborated?
We have also been blinded into thinking the FEMA terror drill was some how part of a government plot! Does anybody really think that the American government would do something so blatant as to cast suspicion on themselves? It makes more sense that some other organization/group took advantage of the chaos and confusion that would arise by actually perpetrating the very attack that everybody thought was a drill. This doesn't point a finger at the government it just means there was a leak.
rodin wrote: | Would not Rodriguez know if there had been a power-down? |
Yes I think Willy would have known but why has he never mentioned it? Even if he had heard about a power down after 911 you would have expected him to incorporate it into his story. If Willy suddenly starts incorporating it into his story that would be suspicious. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 1:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patrick Brown wrote: |
We have also been blinded into thinking the FEMA terror drill was some how part of a government plot! Does anybody really think that the American government would do something so blatant as to cast suspicion on themselves? It makes more sense that some other organization/group took advantage of the chaos and confusion that would arise by actually perpetrating the very attack that everybody thought was a drill. This doesn't point a finger at the government it just means there was a leak.
|
Webster Tarpley has laid out very clearly why 'drills' are run in parallel with False Flag operations. The drill is run to minimise the risk that suspicion will fall on the perpetrators.
I suggest visitors go to this site's homepage and watch the Tarpley lecture.
So, Patrick Brown, a terrorist group waits until it finds out that a government is running a secret drill......then chooses that precise time to enter the target environment which, of course, is now most unusually active with government/ military/CIA personnel........so that it can muddle through all these poor confused people and all the more easily do its dirty work.
I'd call you an idiot but that is not the most significant thing you are.
No genuine poster could propose an idea so ridiculous.
Could I request that the moderators ban this individual from posting here. Patrick Brown's presentation of himself as a seeker after truth is fraudulent. Make sure that no one with his IP address comes back to try and discredit us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 2:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: |
We have also been blinded into thinking the FEMA terror drill was some how part of a government plot! Does anybody really think that the American government would do something so blatant as to cast suspicion on themselves? It makes more sense that some other organization/group took advantage of the chaos and confusion that would arise by actually perpetrating the very attack that everybody thought was a drill. This doesn't point a finger at the government it just means there was a leak.
|
Webster Tarpley has laid out very clearly why 'drills' are run in parallel with False Flag operations. The drill is run to minimise the risk that suspicion will fall on the perpetrators.
I suggest visitors go to this site's homepage and watch the Tarpley lecture.
So, Patrick Brown, a terrorist group waits until it finds out that a government is running a secret drill......then chooses that precise time to enter the target environment which, of course, is now most unusually active with government/ military/CIA personnel........so that it can muddle through all these poor confused people and all the more easily do its dirty work.
I'd call you an idiot but that is not the most significant thing you are.
No genuine poster could propose an idea so ridiculous.
Could I request that the moderators ban this individual from posting here. Patrick Brown's presentation of himself as a seeker after truth is fraudulent. Make sure that no one with his IP address comes back to try and discredit us. |
Just had to quote that as it's a classic piece of denial and misdirection. Now how about some evidence?
Remember all I'm doing is keeping an open mind unfortunately it seems that some of you have already made your mind up. But of course certain people will always make their mind up without evidence won't they? _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
kbo234 Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005 Posts: 2017 Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 3:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Patrick Brown wrote: | But of course certain people will always make their mind up without evidence won't they? |
What a dishonest t*sser.
You wouldn't recognise real evidence if landed on your computer keyboard and called you a disinfo agent with the intelligence of a fish and the integrity of a BBC documentary maker (I think you'll find).
Cut the 'evidence' cr*p Parick Brown. Still prefer your interpretation of the implications of 'drills' to Tarpley's? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 4:05 pm Post subject: |
|
|
kbo234 wrote: | Patrick Brown wrote: | But of course certain people will always make their mind up without evidence won't they? |
What a dishonest t*sser.
You wouldn't recognise real evidence if landed on your computer keyboard and called you a disinfo agent with the intelligence of a fish and the integrity of a BBC documentary maker (I think you'll find).
Cut the 'evidence' cr*p Parick Brown. Still prefer your interpretation of the implications of 'drills' to Tarpley's? |
Just get me several more witnesses to support Forbes story please and while you're at it explain why William Rodriguez has never mentioned the power down? Of course Willy may have mentioned the power down in one of his interviews but I don't remember him doing so. So dig that piece of evidence up while your at it. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:00 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I would NEVER recommend Patrick be banned from this forum. He is a good test of strength of evidence. Same with Ignatz and a few others. It was I, remember, who first brought up the question of whether there really was a power-down pre 911 in the first place. Right now I would leave it out of any court case against our leaders. _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Patrick Brown 9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 10 Oct 2006 Posts: 1201
|
Posted: Sat Feb 17, 2007 5:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If nothing else it shows that we need to be careful of what we believe no matter where it comes from and that includes the NIST report. There's always a path to the truth but it's easy to be sidetracked by exotic fictions. _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk
Get the Steven E Jones reports >HERE< |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|