FAQFAQ   SearchSearch   MemberlistMemberlist  Chat Chat  UsergroupsUsergroups  CalendarCalendar RegisterRegister   ProfileProfile   Log in to check your private messagesLog in to check your private messages   Log inLog in 

the hole in the wall. Pentagon?

 
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News
View previous topic :: View next topic  
Author Message
ishaar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Location: uk

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:05 pm    Post subject: the hole in the wall. Pentagon? Reply with quote

I posted this pic in an earlier post, (scroll down to the 7th pic)

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread79655/pg1

Is this supposed to be a pic of the hole in the outside wall of the pentagon caused by the alleged jet? I would have expected to see some of the windows which seem to be evenly spaced.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
SHERITON HOTEL
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 18 Jun 2006
Posts: 988

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 8:44 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

UGH! this is a government shill 911 "debunker" link, I'll have to go and have a bath!!
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishaar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Location: uk

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:13 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Wow! Just goes to show how easy it is to be called a shill! I know it's a site attempting to prove, with no success, a jet crashed into the pentagon, my question is related to a pic on that site ..... jeeeez!

If it is a pic of where the alleged plane hit, it certainly doesn't look like it, no marks at all from the wings.

By the way, I found the site while trying to find out more about the guy, Mete Sozen, on the bbc doc' who claimed to have merged realistic animation with physical simulation to create his 'evidence'. As I said in my original post, he said the simulation shows how the damage to the pentagon was caused by the mass of the plane plus it's fuel. What he didn't / couldn't explain is why the damage took the form of a small hole, neither did he account for the 'mass' of the engines contacting the wall. or the lack of fire damage. So his 'evidence' is worthless.

Now, can someone answer my question please, is that a photo of the pentagon crash site, or is it some derelict building in downtown Manhattan?

Enjoy ur bath


Last edited by ishaar on Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:26 pm; edited 2 times in total
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishaar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Location: uk

PostPosted: Tue Feb 20, 2007 9:15 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

Sheriton. just realised you were referring to the site..... Embarassed
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Thermate
Angel - now passed away
Angel - now passed away


Joined: 13 Nov 2006
Posts: 445

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 6:58 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The main problem I have with the Pentagon is there should be 3 holes, not one...
_________________
Make love, not money.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:15 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

That's supposed to be an exit hole not an entrance hole.
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
stav
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 25 Feb 2006
Posts: 103
Location: Brighton

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 9:53 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

mark is correct ishaar, that hole is the exit hole in the E ring. this hole was supposed to be made from the cockpit area of the plane. how the cockpit area composed of aluminium and steel managed to go through 3 seperate walls of reinforced concrete then leave only this hole and vaporise at the same time has not been explained. also if there was enough momentum to take the cockpit area to this point where are the engines, wouldn't they also penetrate the wall on either side of this hole.
_________________
open you eyes and see the truth for yourself!
Why the lies?
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 10:43 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

I think that they claim the exit wound was caused by the landing gear.
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishaar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Location: uk

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:07 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

Thanks for clarifying that. I like the little animation they have on that site, the one were they draw an outline of a jet around the outline of distant buildings, then fill in the outline with a pic of a jet....hilarious.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Mark Gobell
On Gardening Leave
On Gardening Leave


Joined: 24 Jul 2006
Posts: 4529

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 11:13 am    Post subject: Reply with quote

The guy's "analysis" animation also showing the wings disintegrating inside the building and the fuel starting to burn - yet no sign that the wings could have entered the building in the first place.
_________________
The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan.
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
ishaar
Moderate Poster
Moderate Poster


Joined: 22 Jun 2006
Posts: 232
Location: uk

PostPosted: Wed Feb 21, 2007 2:20 pm    Post subject: Reply with quote

There must have been a lot of parameter tweaking with that simulation, if indeed it is a simulation and not just an animation. In a simulation you determine the physical properties, mass etc' of all objects in the scene, you can literally make it do anything you want.

Rational thought is under attack. Perhaps why a growing number within the science community are starting to rebel:

Quote:
What do 60 of the world's most influential scientists* have in common?
They all agree that the Bush administration has systematically distorted scientific fact to meet its political goals on issues ranging from military intelligence to health to the environment and more.


http://www.thepetitionsite.com/takeaction/442788860?ltl=1172066914
Back to top
View user's profile Send private message
Display posts from previous:   
Post new topic   Reply to topic    9/11, 7/7, Covid-1984 & the War on Freedom Forum Index -> Stratehy Of Tension, Fake Terror, 9/11 & 7/7 Truth News All times are GMT
Page 1 of 1

 
Jump to:  
You cannot post new topics in this forum
You cannot reply to topics in this forum
You cannot edit your posts in this forum
You cannot delete your posts in this forum
You cannot vote in polls in this forum
You can attach files in this forum
You can download files in this forum


Powered by phpBB © 2001, 2005 phpBB Group