Dissertation - help needed

[Kalli]

Hi all,

It's been a very long time since I've been about! I hope everyone's been well Many apologies for not staying in touch (Though it wasn't deliberate I've been very busy at college...

I actually have a massive favour to ask all here:

I'm doing a dissertation on 9/11 as my college project - and this is the title in progress...

"Is there any justification for the alternative (OR) "conspiracy theories" in relation to the Pentagon attacks on 9/11?"

I've picked it because it seems to be the most obvious case of something more than "miscommunication" and complete failure to respond in an effective manner.

If anyone has any information that could possibly go in it, I would be extremely grateful. I need to write the dissertation (5,000 words) in an analytical way; and therefore need to use the arguments put across by the administration itself - then rebut them using the information that would (most obviously) clarify the need to re-open 9/11 (or at least on the count of the Pentagon). Basically, I want to show that there are unanswered questions.

In case anyone's curious.... I haven't chosen the towers themselves because I think there may well be too much to write about - and 5,000 words would never cut it. It also seems to require at least a minimal knowledge of physics, which I certainly don't have :S

In the meantime, I hope to get a response from people. Please, if you can, don't send links to websites of a dubious nature- my arguments need to be as reputable and solid as possible.

Many thanks,

Kalli xx

[telecasterisation]

You appear to have a history here from your opening gambit, but this is only your second post - have you re-joined?

However, you ask for 'reputable' sources. This is indeed difficult to furnish you as the vast majority is not provable as such and is based upon assumptions that hinge largely on the lack of video evidence (that supposedly exists but we are not privvy to).

There are then the conflicting witness statements, Lloyd England's damaged cab, the uncertain aircraft altitude that smashed light poles, the size of the hole in the building's facade prior to collapse, the lack of aircraft debris and all the other ancillary bits and pieces that go to make up 'The Pentagon' aspect of 9/11.

With this in mind, what you would consider to be justification, I might not and vice versa, things are not that cut and dried. So my advice is take a couple of weeks, do your own research and come to your own conclusions.

[scubadiver]

[Leiff]

Try these:

9/11 Synthetic Terror - Made in the USA by Webster Griffin Tarpley
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119638.pdf

The New Pearl Harbor - Disturbing Questions about the Bush Admin. and 9/11 by David Ray Griffin
http://sandiego.indymedia.org/media/2006/10/119637.pdf

[scar]

Pandora's Black Box - Chapter Two - Flight Of American 77:
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-8672066571196607580&hl=en

Pilotsfor911truth.org presents its first full documentary based on the American 77 Flight Data Recorder as provided by the NTSB following the full flight in real time as it happens in the air traffic system on Sept. 11, 2001. http://pilotsfor911truth.org.

Also check out http://thepentacon.com/
http://thepentacon.com/smokinggun.htm

[Stefan]

The Pentacon is probably worth wataching as well as Pandoras Box (but PB first I'd say)

http://thepentacon.com/smokinggun.htm

They are releasing a longer reseacrhers edition soon as well.

[Kalli]

Thanks for answering, I was afraid no one would reply...

I'll look at these links over the next couple of days

Any more stuff is also very welcome - the deadline is quite far ahead!

Thanks again,

*Kalli *

PS. Yes, I have rejoined. I forgot my username