WTC7 has already been rebuilt

[TRUTH]

Most people don’t know the circumstances surrounding its collapse and have never seen a video of the collapse. Most people don’t know that this building has already been rebuilt! This may very well be because those involved did not want to draw attention to this building! Such publicity may have caused people to ask about a building so blatantly ignored on that fateful day. And, if they knew, they may have started poking around for answers to the obvious questions! You would also think that rebuilding the first WTC structure would have been a loud statement to the so called terrorists. You would think it would stand out a symbol of American strength and resolve. And yet the reconstruction of this building went on and was completed with a virtual media blackout and to the surprise of anyone who eventually finds out about it.

It is equally vital to ask these questions: if construction of the new WTC7 was started in 2002 and completed in May of 2006, “when was the replacement building originally planned?” How long does it take to draw up the plans and actually build a 52 story building, especially in the footprint of damage done on 9/11? How long does it take to prepare for this kind of construction from the time you decide to build?

Let me repeat this as I scream as loud as I can: Construction for a 52 story building started less than one year after there was no reason to plan the project! How long does it take to come up with a design, arrange all the legalities, settle the insurance and arrange for the actual construction! Why wasn’t the rebuilding of this national historic symbol celebrated? Why didn’t FOX News taunt the terrorist with this as a sign of American resolve and as a sign that they did not beat us? Is it possible that this building plan had been initiated prior to the events of 9/11? Is this yet another smoking gun? I think it is!

http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573

[telecasterisation]

[GEFBASS]

IMO TRUTH raises a valid point.

Fema report was in May 2002.

Construction began in 2002.

So the question I would pose is...

How long (because I`m not an architect) does or would it take to design a 52 storey office block that would fit into the great scheme of the rest of the complex?

It seems to me that building WTC7 up again (so quickly) would minimise (only a couple of years) the disruption to the generation of income, No?


Just a thought.

Geoff.

[telecasterisation]

[blackcat]

[GEFBASS]

From this article below.

http://archrecord.construction.com/news/wtc/archives/020311wtc7.asp

March 2002 (6 months after 911)

quote:-

"The Lower Manhattan Redevelopment Corporation (LMRC) is meeting Tuesday, March 12. Sources tell RECORD that John C. Whitehead, chair of LMRC, is eager to begin construction of 7 WTC due to the need for the Con Edison substation. Once the structure for the building is in place, the Con Edison machines, weighing about 250,000 pounds each, can be installed. The Con Edison substation’s power output is needed in anticipation of summer heat as well as upcoming construction in the area. The Con Edison machinery would be on the ground floor of the north and south sides of 7 WTC."

OK mystery solved on why building 7 had to be rebuilt so soon.


But !!
From this article on the same web site.

http://archrecord.construction.com/news/daily/archives/020827wtcprobe. asp

"US launches probe into WTC collapse

August 27, 2002

The Federal government launched a probe into the design and eventual collapse of the World Trade Center towers in an attempt to make other tall buildings safer to occupy. The study will take two years and be conducted by the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST). Congress is considering a bill that would give the institute subpoena power, which previous inquiries into the Trade Center collapse, including a six-month study by the Federal Emergency Management Agency and the American Society of Civil Engineers, did not have.

The NIST will use interviews, photographs, videos, and computer modeling, as well as structural steel recovered from the collapse, to study the disaster. The findings of the study may result in new codes and standards for tall-building construction.


Kevin Lerner. "

Just a thought then but if it is not known really how WTC7 came down (officially) why did Larry get the go ahead to rebuild above the substation?

I mean I thought the fuel in the building caused devastating fires and that they had to be pulled.

What ever happened to `Won`t get fooled again` to use a quote from The Who, ` meet the new boss, same as the old boss ` .....

Geoff.

[chek]

[chek]

[ian neal]

Great post Truth.

One of many

The TVlies site looks great. Great common sense accessable presentatiuon of the case for 9/11 truth

Liked what truthman had to say in the comments section

http://tvnewslies.org/blog/?p=573#comment-5332