I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on. _________________ SAPERE AUDE
Where the mods when you need them? In the old days, well a few months ago, a thread like this would just get locked or moved.
Seems that the likes of TC and 4U2P have been given the freedom of the city! _________________ We check the evidence and then archive it: www.911evidencebase.co.uk Get the Steven E Jones reports>HERE<
I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on.
I have asked you to supply evidence of a plane hitting the north tower, I would welcome any imput from you, Lady Sam.
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
Are you aware that your contributions are becoming more demented with each subsequent post you make? 'Prove that explosives were used to make a hole', indeed. You are a total spoon, a total, utter, rubber spoon. That is like me saying 'prove to me that your planes were switched'. Or asking you to provide us with footage of the explosives being positioned into the WTC. You are a goofball. Get off my thread!
From now on I will be ignoring you, you are just trolling. Now, get lost.
Anybody with sensible contributions, please do submit.
Live newscaster states that there has been an explosion in the South Tower. I want every plane hugger to explain what is happening here. I am even willing to let Marky54 try to redeem himself.
I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on.
I have asked you to supply evidence of a plane hitting the north tower, I would welcome any imput from you, Lady Sam.
This is like a criminal asking the jury to prove it wasnt them that did the crime. You are the one with the hugely debateable theory here. A theory you have not once explained yourself, despite me asking you to (very politely i hasten to add) twice last week. You just ignored my responce. I have asked you to explain in full how you think the NPT works from start to finish, instead you are still here posting cryptic rubbish and insults.
Trust me mate,I dont care enough to start running around the net trying to prove the NPT is wrong, i spent enugh time last year just taking in the whole story and that is enough for me for it to have changed my life as it is.
I can guarantee you however, that anyone who is new to this concept of 911 being a lie will be turned off by your posts, and will not find any help in the way you position yourself and your theory.
The 9/11 truth thing is not an argument between two sets of beliefs overe one individual event of that day, but sadly a small minority seem to have been swallowed up by this urge to push this frankly boring idea that no planes were involved.
In doing so you are showing yourselves up for being the small minded sensationalists you are, and you do yourselves, your theories and sadly the 9.11 truth movement no good whatsoever.
Noone on this board is going to solve 9.11, so get over it, get a life and try and discuss the bigger picture like an adult. _________________ SAPERE AUDE
I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on.
I have asked you to supply evidence of a plane hitting the north tower, I would welcome any imput from you, Lady Sam.
This is like a criminal asking the jury to prove it wasnt them that did the crime. You are the one with the hugely debateable theory here. A theory you have not once explained yourself, despite me asking you to (very politely i hasten to add) twice last week. You just ignored my responce. I have asked you to explain in full how you think the NPT works from start to finish, instead you are still here posting cryptic rubbish and insults.
Trust me mate,I dont care enough to start running around the net trying to prove the NPT is wrong, i spent enugh time last year just taking in the whole story and that is enough for me for it to have changed my life as it is.
I can guarantee you however, that anyone who is new to this concept of 911 being a lie will be turned off by your posts, and will not find any help in the way you position yourself and your theory.
The 9/11 truth thing is not an argument between two sets of beliefs overe one individual event of that day, but sadly a small minority seem to have been swallowed up by this urge to push this frankly boring idea that no planes were involved.
In doing so you are showing yourselves up for being the small minded sensationalists you are, and you do yourselves, your theories and sadly the 9.11 truth movement no good whatsoever.
Noone on this board is going to solve 9.11, so get over it, get a life and try and discuss the bigger picture like an adult.
I would appreciate your comments on the images shown in this footage. Why is there no plane and why are the newscasters seeing only explosions from the chopper footage? You have asked me for evidence and I am providing it.
I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on.
I have asked you to supply evidence of a plane hitting the north tower, I would welcome any imput from you, Lady Sam.
This is like a criminal asking the jury to prove it wasnt them that did the crime. You are the one with the hugely debateable theory here. A theory you have not once explained yourself, despite me asking you to (very politely i hasten to add) twice last week. You just ignored my responce. I have asked you to explain in full how you think the NPT works from start to finish, instead you are still here posting cryptic rubbish and insults.
Trust me mate,I dont care enough to start running around the net trying to prove the NPT is wrong, i spent enugh time last year just taking in the whole story and that is enough for me for it to have changed my life as it is.
I can guarantee you however, that anyone who is new to this concept of 911 being a lie will be turned off by your posts, and will not find any help in the way you position yourself and your theory.
The 9/11 truth thing is not an argument between two sets of beliefs overe one individual event of that day, but sadly a small minority seem to have been swallowed up by this urge to push this frankly boring idea that no planes were involved.
In doing so you are showing yourselves up for being the small minded sensationalists you are, and you do yourselves, your theories and sadly the 9.11 truth movement no good whatsoever.
Noone on this board is going to solve 9.11, so get over it, get a life and try and discuss the bigger picture like an adult.
I would appreciate your comments on the images shown in this footage. Why is there no plane and why are the newscasters seeing only explosions from the chopper footage? You have asked me for evidence and I am providing it.
Your just providing another video, another video which I can have no clirty over its authenticity. Do you see how pointless this is? You post a video clip and claim it as gospel, I post a video clip clip and you say its false.
When does this end? There is no winner in this debate, and you are to simple to see that. _________________ SAPERE AUDE
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
Are you aware that your contributions are becoming more demented with each subsequent post you make? 'Prove that explosives were used to make a hole', indeed. You are a total spoon, a total, utter, rubber spoon. That is like me saying 'prove to me that your planes were switched'. Or asking you to provide us with footage of the explosives being positioned into the WTC. You are a goofball. Get off my thread!
From now on I will be ignoring you, you are just trolling. Now, get lost.
Anybody with sensible contributions, please do submit.
SEE BLATANT! he has no proof to support what he is saying. why would somebody claim something then refuse to show proof to back it up?
then people wonder why people get annoyed when people are promoting things as fact with NO evidence.
I'd eat you alive mate, but not in the sense your so desperately in need of.
Then again, if one day you wish to start debating your theories with some clarity and thought then maybe we could see if your worth spending any time on.
I have asked you to supply evidence of a plane hitting the north tower, I would welcome any imput from you, Lady Sam.
This is like a criminal asking the jury to prove it wasnt them that did the crime. You are the one with the hugely debateable theory here. A theory you have not once explained yourself, despite me asking you to (very politely i hasten to add) twice last week. You just ignored my responce. I have asked you to explain in full how you think the NPT works from start to finish, instead you are still here posting cryptic rubbish and insults.
Trust me mate,I dont care enough to start running around the net trying to prove the NPT is wrong, i spent enugh time last year just taking in the whole story and that is enough for me for it to have changed my life as it is.
I can guarantee you however, that anyone who is new to this concept of 911 being a lie will be turned off by your posts, and will not find any help in the way you position yourself and your theory.
The 9/11 truth thing is not an argument between two sets of beliefs overe one individual event of that day, but sadly a small minority seem to have been swallowed up by this urge to push this frankly boring idea that no planes were involved.
In doing so you are showing yourselves up for being the small minded sensationalists you are, and you do yourselves, your theories and sadly the 9.11 truth movement no good whatsoever.
Noone on this board is going to solve 9.11, so get over it, get a life and try and discuss the bigger picture like an adult.
I would appreciate your comments on the images shown in this footage. Why is there no plane and why are the newscasters seeing only explosions from the chopper footage? You have asked me for evidence and I am providing it.
Your just providing another video, another video which I can have no clirty over its authenticity. Do you see how pointless this is? You post a video clip and claim it as gospel, I post a video clip clip and you say its false.
When does this end? There is no winner in this debate, and you are to simple to see that.
WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE FOOTAGE YOU FREAKING IMBECILE? WHAT IS HAPPENING IN THE FOOTAGE??
explosions always bend objects inwards towards the blast I suppose? yup... of course.
I put it to you, provide evidence there WASN'T a plane? Or will you just reply by taking the mickey out of the poster? If so.... you have my pity. _________________
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
Are you aware that your contributions are becoming more demented with each subsequent post you make? 'Prove that explosives were used to make a hole', indeed. You are a total spoon, a total, utter, rubber spoon. That is like me saying 'prove to me that your planes were switched'. Or asking you to provide us with footage of the explosives being positioned into the WTC. You are a goofball. Get off my thread!
From now on I will be ignoring you, you are just trolling. Now, get lost.
Anybody with sensible contributions, please do submit.
SEE BLATANT! he has no proof to support what he is saying. why would somebody claim something then refuse to show proof to back it up?
then people wonder why people get annoyed when people are promoting things as fact with NO evidence.
What are you seeing in the footage you useless twit?
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
Are you aware that your contributions are becoming more demented with each subsequent post you make? 'Prove that explosives were used to make a hole', indeed. You are a total spoon, a total, utter, rubber spoon. That is like me saying 'prove to me that your planes were switched'. Or asking you to provide us with footage of the explosives being positioned into the WTC. You are a goofball. Get off my thread!
From now on I will be ignoring you, you are just trolling. Now, get lost.
Anybody with sensible contributions, please do submit.
SEE BLATANT! he has no proof to support what he is saying. why would somebody claim something then refuse to show proof to back it up?
then people wonder why people get annoyed when people are promoting things as fact with NO evidence.
What are you seeing in the footage you useless twit?
I am still waiting. I have a feeling I am going to be waiting a long time.
the plane hole, no rush in explaining ive only been waiting since the theory began im sure i can wait another few years.
Pre-positioned explosives. Are you also falling for the lame myth that planes leave cartoon plane shapes?
evidence please. a link an explaination how they work, anything?
or are we just presuming and making it up? if not there will be a link here soon.
if there isnt any evidence here soon then i have to assume you are just speculating with out really knowing or lieing to make your theory true.
i look forward to the proof . thanks for taking the time and effort to trying to prove this good luck with your search or whatever to prove these pre-postioned explosives were used and can cause what we see and make a plane shape.
just to cover your cartoon point. do cartoon holes in cartoon just apear from thin air? or does the hole only coincide with an object? ive just never seen a cartoon where nothing causes a great big hole. so not even cartoonist deem it possible
Are you aware that your contributions are becoming more demented with each subsequent post you make? 'Prove that explosives were used to make a hole', indeed. You are a total spoon, a total, utter, rubber spoon. That is like me saying 'prove to me that your planes were switched'. Or asking you to provide us with footage of the explosives being positioned into the WTC. You are a goofball. Get off my thread!
From now on I will be ignoring you, you are just trolling. Now, get lost.
Anybody with sensible contributions, please do submit.
SEE BLATANT! he has no proof to support what he is saying. why would somebody claim something then refuse to show proof to back it up?
then people wonder why people get annoyed when people are promoting things as fact with NO evidence.
What are you seeing in the footage you useless twit?
i gave you an oppertunity to show evidence you failed then resulted to insults as usual, you are totally out of order and destroying the movement why is your theory more important that the movement TC?
why can you not just prove how the holes were made(the only thing that can even make me start to believe npt)why do you insult? why do you make us all look so bad to outsiders? what is your game?
Not an image of AA11. Only an image of what was believed to be Flight 11. Whether it really was Flight 11 has never been proved.
Except for all the dead people who were known to be on it ? _________________ So remember - next time you can't find a parking spot, go to plan B: blow up your car
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
