Inside facts about the 7/7 London bombings

[Linda]

'Inside facts about the 7/7 London bombings'

‘No, they weren’t working consciously for MI-5. They would just be a shadow team lured into London to be part of a covert programme of simulated attacks. They were paid to be in a certain place at a certain time to take part in a simulated attack. A company was running a simulated terror attackat the time. Those boys were part of that. They were told "Your backpacks represent explosive devices but of course they aren't explosives".’
Read more...


Monday, 19 February 2007
'Inside facts about the 7/7 London bombings'
By James Casbolt

The British and US government are stirring an atmosphere of animosity and hatred between white and Asian people in the UK, US and around the world. Whites verses Asians invents the excuse for the invasion of the Middle East. They are also looking for a minority to blame for the terrorism in the UK and US that the governments themselves are responsible for. This is known as ‘false flag’ terrorism. 'Al Qaeda' is an MI- 6, CIA organisation utilising Middle Eastern assets. These are big claims but this is backed up with evidence from my MI-6 contacts. My friend below was briefed in detail regarding what really happened on 7/7 and how the British Government were responsible.

James Casbolt- ‘So you are saying the bombs were planted into the bus several days before the 7/7 London bombings.’

X10- ‘ Yes, the British government switched the safety checking team. When they went into the bus depot a few days before hand a trade union spokesman who was asked about this said he couldn’t understand who the security was. He didn’t recognise anybody. These were people who come into check the buses. They normally check the buses for things like suspension, braking systems and the security cameras. Instead of staying what is usually an hour or so these people were there for the entire day. When workers approached them and started making small talk they were basically ignored . So they had the feeling that these people were not regular security.’

James Casbolt- ‘So they were probably MI-5?’

X10- ‘They were MI-5. They were there primarily to make sure the videocamera went off at a certain time. Which is of course what happened. Isn’t it is amazing that on that day, this was similar to what happened with the cameras prior to the death of Princess Diana. All the security cameras that counted on 7/7, not the ones that didn’t count, the ones that really counted weren't working. The security camera on that bus wasn't working on that particular day.

James Casbolt- ‘So where did they plant the bombs on the bus?’

X10- ‘Inside the seats and under the floor. I know that the eye witness accounts of what happened were all at variance with one another. The BBC relied exclusively on a testimony given by a Scottish guy. The Scottish guy contradicted himself so many times and yet no one in the media asked him about these contradictory statements. He said in one report that he got offthe front of the bus and in another report he said he left through the rear door. One report said he was the first out and another report he said wasthe last off the bus. So there appears to be a lot of confusion in terms of the report.’

James Casbolt- ‘So the four Asian lads were they MI-5 assets?’

X10- ‘They were stooges’

James Casbolt- ‘Do you think they consciously knew they were working for MI-5’

X10- ‘No, they weren’t working consciously for MI-5. They would just be a shadow team lured into London to be part of a covert programme of simulated attacks. They were paid to be in a certain place at a certain time to take part in a simulated attack. A company was running a simulated terror attackat the time. Those boys were part of that. They were told ‘Your backpacks represent explosive devices but of course they aren't explosives.’

James Casbolt- ‘So they were told ‘this is just a dummy run.’

X10- ‘It was a dummy run. They were part of the dummy run. They stopped their car just outside of Luton and they were briefed by somebody. When they left Luton of course, they didn’t leave Luton at the time described because there was a c*** up with train times. So whether they managed to get to ondon or not is an unknown because the video camera evidence has been shownto be faulty. There is a problem with the timing on some of the video footage.’

James Casbolt- ‘So they bought return tickets?’

X10 - ‘Yea, they bought return tickets. Of course you wouldn't but return tickets if you knew you were on a one way journey to hell. Some of the other reports that were briefly mentioned in the quality, alternative media and not the tabloid media. Then they were completely ignored by the controlled tabloid media, was one eye witness who was talking about the fact that as she was coming off the train were the bomb exploded. The police officer said "Mind the hole!" and he pointed to a huge blast which showed the metalstructure of the under carriage facing upwards as if the bomb had blown upwards. This was the security services taking the extra insurance that incase any of the bombs that their agents had left on the train and those were ex MI-5, ex SAS people, that they would have had a back up, a contingency to make sure those explosions did take place. A number of reports reported more bombs than there were alleged terrorists.’

James Casbolt- ‘Why is it ex MI-5 doing it? Why is it not active MI5 agents?

X10- ‘In a way there is no such thing as ex MI-5. Once your MI-5 you’re always MI-5 [I would have to disagree with that statement as I managed to get away from my involvement with MI-6- James Casbolt]. A lot of MI-5 people get jobs with other organisation that are similar in structure when they leave the security services. These organisations are usually part of the private sector. There have been a number of these organisations over the years. A very, very famous intelligence unit that used to work under Peter Mandelson involved in the oil business, and they announced a disclosure about three years ago. Norton Taylor who works for the intelligence part of the Guardian. He pointed out then that such organisations often announce their demise and its nothing of the sort. Its just disinformation or they just change into another company with exactly the same brief. There a lot of these little private organisations that soak up people who have left these intelligence services and they have them working on a private basis but more often than not they are contracted and they get work contracted out to them from the government.’

James Casbolt- ‘So the four Asian lads, they were probably having theirstrings pulled by MI-5 officers.’


X10- Oh yea, absolutely without a doubt. They were runners, a dummy team. I’ve spoken to a few people about the way in which dummy teams are run. They interest lads like that, what MI-5 do is they say something like ‘We want you to be part of a film, part of a dummy run working with the government and also working with BBC producers on developing scenarios in which terrorist attacks in the UK could take place. You get to London and then you do this, meet us at a certain place and we give you a thousand quid’. That’s easy money and its easy money for what? Travelling to London, sitting on a train with a backpack for about half an hour or so and you collect your loot.’

James Casbolt- ‘Do you think Mohammad Sidique Khan would have been a conscious MI-5 agent?’

X10- ‘He may have been paid by MI-5 to go through that on the TV. The same way as, there is another guy who is a known MI-5 agent. He used to be the sidekick of Abdul H the Muslim preacher. He was no 2. He was a ‘Mr Fixer’ and had links to all sorts of exotic quasi terrorist organisations, which are of course almost all run by British intelligence. I wish I could remember his name.’

James Casbolt- ‘You said one of the ex SAS men who was responsible for the bombings was called Mcgreagor and he was disguised as a homeless person.’

X10- ‘That's what they do to blend in, well not blend in but to make them look conspicuous. If you’ve got a homeless person clutching an old Tesco’s bag or something you don’t tend to look at him and say the guy looks like security threat.’

James Casbolt- ‘Can you explain what he did.’

X10- ‘He was on the train and left a package with explosives in. The man who told me this, I developed a close relationship in the past and trusted him.’


James Casbolt- ‘And this man was an MI-6 officer?’

X10- ‘Ex MI-6. He longer worked for them. Even in the days when I knew him he had already left the service. As far as the bus operations were concerned that was not his main topic. He was talking mostly about the people in the tube bombings. When all of the eye witness statements came up later on talking about the possibility that the bombs may have been placed under the buses, what the government did was put in a fail safe to make sure that even if some thing went wrong on the day with those people who were involved in the bombings themselves, they would at least have a secondary system to ensure the bombs exploded at exactly the time they wanted.’

James Casbolt- ‘So would they have been set on timers?’

X10- ‘They were set on timers.’

James Casbolt- ‘So they wouldn’t have needed to be remotely detonated?’

X10- ‘No. This whole remote system is quite strange because on the day itself Ian Blair took down all of the mobile phone communications. Everything was switched off. You couldn’t make a mobile phone call. He knew in any event that there were no remote detonators and he was just covering his arse in case any curious journalists asked him a pertinent question later on. There were no remote detonations on the day at all. They were all personally delivered to the destinations.’

James Casbolt- ‘What happened on the tube then?’

X10- ‘The agents were there at the exactly the right time they were supposed to be. If it was the actual case that those guys actually did get the train from Luton. I don’t believe they got the train from Luton because apparently that train never turned up. But if they had got to London beforehand whichis probably the case, they would have had plenty of time to receive the briefing in London. They would have got on the train. They would have then been followed by these ex MI-5, SAS officers, so that they were actually in the same cart as the so-called juvenile bombers. It would have taken place as
scheduled.’

James Casbolt- ‘So the guys on the train who were ex MI-5, ex SAS, they left the explosives on the train and then got off. What were their names again?’

X10- ‘The ex MI-5 man was codenamed ’J-boy’ and Mcgreagor was the ex SAS guy.’
James Casbolt- ‘And then you say they escaped in a Vauxhall Cabriolet?’

X10- ‘Yes and they were driven away from the scene.’

James Casbolt- ‘So your MI-6 contact confirmed it was a Vauxhall cabriolet?’

X10- ‘Yes.’

James Casbolt- ‘So J-boy and Mcgreagor left explosives in bags under the seats but there were secondary explosives under the train carriage in case they didn’t go off.’

X10- ‘Yes.’

James Casbolt- ‘Do you know were the safe house was where Mcgreagor and J-boy went afterwards.’


X10- ‘The safe house was in South London. This is a very unfortunate event that is going to be churning around in people’s minds for a long time to come. We need a proper public enquiry.’

To the government factions who were involved in this act of mass killing I say this. How dare you blow up and murder British people! All those who are accountable will be held fully accountable when the time comes! That time is coming soon. In my vision I see Asian and white brothers and sisters coming together in love and harmony in this country and confronting the government peacefully for their terrorist crimes.

James Casbolt

http://www.davidicke.com/content/view/5659/48/

[rodin]

A tall tale. Obachike-stylee. Conversation in Hebrew. etc

'I escaped from MI-6'

[numeral]

What's a Vauxhall Cabriolet?

[Bushwacker]

[marky 54]

cannot find one by doing a search, the nearest in name terms i can find are vauxhall cavalier, vauxhall calibra, vauxhall corsa.

unless the car was a differant make, volkswagon?

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

[Skeptic]

[marky 54]

[THETRUTHWILLSETU3]

what's a cabroilet Marky?

[PaulStott]

[TonyGosling]

Cars? Cabriolets? Are you missing the point here.?

Let's get Cashbolt down to East London University on Monday 19th arch and have this out.

Officer or mere agent?

[kbo234]

This guy Casbolt seems pretty 'way out' and definitely not to be trusted without some very close and serious scrutiny.......but his story of 7/7 is much how I had imagined it had been pulled off.

Like many 9/11 truthers I never thought that the Asian guys were any more than 'patsies'.

If he is talking in public anytime please inform us through this site.

[Micpsi]

James Casbolt is a con-artist and fantasist, whom I and others exposed on another forum several months ago. One of the photos (now taken off) he put on his website at http://jamescasbolt.com/index.htm purported, he said, to be that of Lord Marduk, the hybrid ET leader of the Annunaki. After a Google search, I discovered the original photo of Zbigniew Brzezinski that was edited with Photoshop or some other image-editing software to turn him into an alien-looking Lord Marduk (I can provide links if anyone still needs to be convinced). The jacket, tie and backdrop are identical - one can even spot a mistake made during editing of the photo that went unnoticed. Other photos were passed off on his website as original, yet have been located in websites on ETS, military underground bases, tunnels, etc. He claims to know a lot about these topics, so it is simply not credible that he was unaware these photos can be found on many websites devoted to these subjects. One "photo" is now known to be a frame captured from a computer video game, but he claims it to be that of an underground base!

Now Casbolt is trying to pretend he is not the source of these photos by saying:

"Now onto the SAALM photos that have caused so much controversy. Many people claim they have been photoshopped and manipulated. I cannot say whether they are 100% genuine or not. However I will say this. Certain secret service people claim they have been run through a graphic manipulation programme to ensure ‘plausible deniability’. Then there is the infamous photo of the ET Enlil (if it is real). I have heard it said many times that because he has similar facial features to Brzezinski it is a photo shopped picture of Brezezinski. However Brezezinski is one of the top members of SAALM (codenamed P1). With the following intel there may be a logical explanation for the Enlil photo-
[From : xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Sent : 30 November 2006 11:21:00 To : jamescasbolt@hotmail.co.uk Subject : RE: Photoshop

JAMES

THE PHOTOS ARE REAL, BUT WERE ALSO PUT THROUGH A GRAPHIC MANIPULATION PROGRAM TO ENSURE PLAUSIBLE DENIABILITY. THEY ARE VERY CAREFUL NOT TO REVEAL THERE PLANS JAMES.

EVERYONE HAS AN OPINION MOST INCORRECT. ENLILS TIE IS A SAALM TIE THAT THEY ALL WEAR AT MEETINGS INCLUDING BRZEZINSKI.

ENLIL AND BRZEZINSKI ARE VERY CLOSELY RELATED, BRZEZINSKI IS FROM A BLUE BLOOD JESUIT FAMILY THAT TRACES ITSELF BACK TO THE ORIGINAL MARDUK LINEAGE.

xxxxxxxxxxxxx]

Again I do not know for sure if the SAALM photos are real. However SAALM is a real group. The photos and accompying emails are printed below for your perusal and judgement."
http://jamescasbolt.com/saalm_update.htm

Oh, yes, you DO know, Mr Casbolt. That's a blatant lie. Don't pretend you have not read how you were exposed. The photo is as phony as SAALM. I found the striped tie you mention on MANY other photos of Brzezinski taken at the New York office of the Council on Foreign Relations (as shown marked on the blue curtain behind him in some of the photos), so don't give us this nonsense that he was attending a secret meeting of SAALM and did some kind of Icke-type lizard-shift (in front of newsmen who photographed him?!). And stop e-mailing phony e-mails to yourself, claiming they were sent by intel people. They don't count as evidence because there is no checkable e-mail address of the sender on them!

James Casbolt is either a con-artist and disinformationist or else he is schizophrenic, utterly detached from reality. I feel very confident that his latest article is yet another piece of fiction based upon contacts in MI5 just as imaginary as his "Lord Marduk." As usual, there is nothing original in it, being a scenario that was widely discussed on forums shortly after 7/7. If the guy had shown just a little more originality, instead of plagariazing everything that he passes off as his own and posting bogus photos on his website that are easily rumbled, he might have got away with his fantasies a bit longer.

[karlos]

Why would a guy about to blow himself up go into a mcdonalds, queue up buy an Egg McMuffin? while wearing a white baseball cap?
We are told that this geezer was a muslim so it does not seem to make sense. 9am McDonalds only does a breakfast menu which is all PORK.

Allthough a still image was released no staff member remembers serving him. Or else they would have made statements. And before the bus bomber had time to digest his pork he topped himself.
It is so far fetched. Next you will be telling us a couple of hicks walked on the moon back in the sixties.

Remember only two still images have been released. One at Luton station and one in Mcdonalds kings cross.
Non from the bus, the tube carraiges, the tube platforms, the tube stations, the train carraige, the train platform or from any street cctv cameras or any traffic cameras or any nearby buildings.
All the eyewitnesses say the bombs were UNDER the floor.
21/7 all the above cctv footage has been released.
This means on 7/7 it does not exist.

[olly onions]

Poll boost for 7/7 Truth Campaign http://ollysonions.blogspot.com/2007/03/future-looks-bright-for-conspi racy.html

[karlos]

BOMBERS COULD NOT HAVE CAUGHT THE 7.40am TRAIN FROM LUTON - The Met claimed the alleged bombers caught the 7.40 Thameslink train from Luton to Kings Cross but this train was CANCELLED. BBC2's Horizon reported that they caught the 7.48 train. This train arrived in London at 8.43, some 17 minutes AFTER the police say they have CCTV of the men at King's Cross. If the alleged bombers caught an earlier train from Luton then SHOW US THE EVIDENCE and explain the inconsistencies.

NO CCTV FOOTAGE SHOWN OF THE FOUR ALLEGED BOMBERS IN LONDON! Why? Since when did one poor-quality photograph in which three of the faces cannot be identified, said to be taken 30 miles away at Luton, count as conclusive evidence?

What happened to the seven explosions originally reported and the timings of 8.51, 8.56 & 9.17? Many survivors reported electrocution, sparks and explosions OUTSIDE trains. Which came first, explosions or power surges?