| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
 Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:22 pm Post subject: New Research Section Proposed |
 |
|
Ian Neal has suggested that this site does not endorse particular 9/11 theories by placing TV Fakery in the 9/11 Truth Controversies section, a section the front page of the site has suggested as being the most controversial.
Given that Mr Neal has made it clear that there is no value judgement or endorsement of the site for any particular set of theories, I propose that we rename that section of the site "New 9/11 Research".
If "most controversial" is a neutral term, perhaps you should call this section, "Mundane Articles" and describe it as offering the least revealing conventional wisdom about 9/11.
I really don't see why anyone should object. By the way, if you are actually trying to learn about what happened on 9/11 and why, I think you'll find you're in the wrong section of this website. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:31 pm Post subject: |
|
|
so where's the article fred?
This can go into general chat
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 1:04 pm Post subject: |
|
|
May I suggest that a section called
'Twaddle From The No-Planers and Related Theories' be set up?
That seems a suitably self explanatory and quarantined environment to me.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
gareth
Suspended
Joined: 19 Dec 2006
Posts: 398
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
