View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Abandoned Ego Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:23 pm Post subject: Zionism exposed - Who was in favour of the Iraq war ? |
|
|
Perhaps this poll should give us a true indication to exactly who the driving force behind Zionism is.
As Michael Rivero might say, "Imagine my shock"
An analysis of Gallup Poll data collected since the beginning of 2005 finds that among the major religious groups in the United States, Jewish Americans are the most strongly opposed to the Iraq war. Catholics and Protestants are more or less divided in their views on the war, while Mormons are the most likely to favor it. Those with no religious affiliation also oppose the war, but not to the same extent that Jewish people do. The greater opposition to the war is not simply a result of high Democratic identification among U.S. Jews, as Jews of all political persuasions are more likely to oppose the war than non-Jews who share the same political leanings.
For this analysis, Gallup combined 13 surveys from the last two-plus years that measured both support for the Iraq war (using Gallup's "mistake for the U.S. to send troops to Iraq" question) and respondent religious affiliation, for a combined sample of more than 12,000 interviews. Across the time period these 13 surveys covered, an average of 52% of Americans opposed the war by saying the United States made a mistake to invade Iraq, and 46% favored the war by saying it did not make a mistake.
The table shows how Iraq war support breaks down among the religious groups for which there are sufficiently large sample sizes to provide stable estimates.
United States Made a Mistake in Sending Troops to Iraq, by Religious Affiliation, 2005-2007 Gallup Polls
* Jewish people oppose the Iraq war by a better than 3-to-1 margin, 77% to 21%.
Link ; http://www.sandersresearch.com/index.php?option=com_content&task=view& id=1141&Itemid=61
Not that Im big on religious affiliation as you might have gathered from my posts, but I kinda get fed up of the pseudo religious stereotyping that acts as IMHO a deliberate distraction from the real criminals. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
blackcat Validated Poster
Joined: 07 May 2006 Posts: 2376
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 9:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
The vast majority of British were against the Iraq war for all the good it did. It is not the hoi polloi who make the decisions. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abandoned Ego Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Fri Mar 02, 2007 10:29 pm Post subject: |
|
|
blackcat wrote: | The vast majority of British were against the Iraq war for all the good it did. It is not the hoi polloi who make the decisions. |
It sure as hell aint, and judging by this poll, it sure as hell aint "The jews" .
So perhaps we can stop looking too specifically at the crappy little colony in the Middle East, and rather look at who the TRUE driving forces behind "Zionism" are.
As Ian Crane has said, "WAR, what is is good for, absolutely nothing?"
Unless of course you happen to be the people who have profited from war from time immemorial, and use war as a means of taking money out of YOUR pocket, dropping it in theirs, whilst maintaining the control of us all.
This is the just the latest installment in a loooooonnnngggggg running saga.
Enough is enough huh ? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
London Mick Moderate Poster
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 139 Location: London
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 2:16 am Post subject: |
|
|
So why do you keep returning to the subject like a dog to it's vomit? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Abandoned Ego Moderate Poster
Joined: 23 Sep 2005 Posts: 288
|
Posted: Sat Mar 03, 2007 10:25 pm Post subject: woof woof. |
|
|
London Mick wrote: | So why do you keep returning to the subject like a dog to it's vomit? |
Well, because a) You asked the question, Mick and
b) its such a stunningly appropriate Metaphor, I will answer your question.
I keep returning to my vomit, because for quite a while in my 5 year investigations of alternative history ( having obtained a history degree which I suddenly realised in factual terms at least, wasnt worth the paper it was printed on), I myself fell for the "Israel did it" ruse, with all its associated implications,.
I subsequently recurgitated such vomit on various forums, completely oblivious to the stench it created. And of course this wasnt cos I was a racist - I was passionately angry and sympathetic for the victims of Israeli violence in the ME, which I had hithertothen assumed to be justifiable actions, due to the "terrorist threat" they were facing
Indeed the Palestinian issue, was my first peek behind the curtain at what was really going on in the world, so to speak.
I frequented sites like WRH, and Save the males, keenly digesting all the "facts" that were being thrown my way, and keenly repeated them whenever the opportunity presented itself.
The problem however with adopting such a perspective, is that it makes ones perspective distinctly warped, and throws you ( as intended IMHO) off kilter.
Fortunately I got over that stage, and now see the absurdity of suggesting that the Ills of the world are down to Israel and "The mossad" and the bankers, and "the joos".
So now I have a more tempered view. That is to say, Im not afraid to recognise the abhorrent behaviour of Israel in the OTs, and more recently in the Lebanon.
But I tend to look now more at their sponsors, and the real powerbrokers, who if you want my opinion, are using the "Neocons" and Israel to promote their millenia old agenda, and might well hang them out to dry at any time.
I dont wish this movement, which I also care passionately about to be tarred with the same brush that I was tarred with ( albeit wrongly ) due to my skewed perspective.
Im simply hoping that people might take lessons from my own experiences.
Hence the stunningly appropriate nature of the metaphor you employed.
Hope that helps. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
London Mick Moderate Poster
Joined: 07 Feb 2007 Posts: 139 Location: London
|
Posted: Sun Mar 04, 2007 3:33 am Post subject: |
|
|
Yes, it is rather a good metaphor, isn't it? I must find an excuse to use it again sometime!
I see where you are coming from re the shadowy people who down the millenia have steered world events and possibly they are still at work. Well they are still at work and using the Israelis. The Israelis and their neo-con supporters like Pearle, Frieth and others are quite capable of pulling off 9'11 and pulling us all into global conflagration. I believe the bankers, led by the Rothschilds wish to rule us all from Jerusalem, hence the building of the over sized Supreme Court and the incursions into the Temple Rock.
They are behind the big trading blocks like the EU and Nafta and the others in SE Asia. They are pulling more and more countries into the EU and doing away with individual soveriegnity and nationhood and forcing multi-culturism on us all. We WILL be all chipped and our movements monitered. We WILL be passified by these "phone masts" that they are erecting all over the land. Our water WILL be drugged. Cash WILL be done away with.
They may even kill a few dozen million of us by sending a blast down our mobile phones! War WILL continue. More false flags will happen.
OK, so maybe the Vatican is running the show, the Pilgrim Society, The Knights of Malta, Opus Dei, who knows who. Their front men are the Israelis and the Zionists who mostly happen to be Jews so they will catch the flack. Tough!
Who do YOU suggest we go after?
Instead of the annual march to Aldermaston should we all be marching to Waddington Manor, Jacob Rothschilds country house or even his massive town house in Regents Park next to the Danish Church? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
TonyGosling Editor
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
|
|
Back to top |
|
|
Mark Gobell On Gardening Leave
Joined: 24 Jul 2006 Posts: 4529
|
Posted: Fri Mar 09, 2007 3:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
_________________ The Medium is the Massage - Marshall McLuhan. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
Westgate Minor Poster
Joined: 02 Jan 2007 Posts: 79 Location: Cambridge
|
Posted: Sat Mar 10, 2007 10:36 am Post subject: Source of challenging reading |
|
|
I find some of these books make challenging reading - I have not read them all by any means - at least not in detail - but they have the potential to be true 'eye-openers'
http://www.sweetliberty.org/issues/wars/ _________________ Confidence, is the feeling you get before you understand the problem. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|