| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
 Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 1:09 am Post subject: |
 |
|
| I am sure you are right, Long Tooth, truth for you lies only within your own head, external inputs only cause confusion and negativity, and you should isolate yourself from them to gain true enlightenment. |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 1:59 am Post subject: |
|
|
do not watch the bbc#otherwise known as the bush and blair corporation
it is nothing but lies and propaganda
on europe
on israel
on iraq
and especially 911 they were part of the cover up operation
_________________
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 4:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | do not watch the bbc#otherwise known as the bush and blair corporation
it is nothing but lies and propaganda
on europe
on israel
on iraq
and especially 911 they were part of the cover up operation |
Of course they were, part of the 3,141,592 people involved, none of whom has come near to blowing the whistle. An amazing operation! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Fri May 04, 2007 10:38 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | do not watch the bbc#otherwise known as the bush and blair corporation
it is nothing but lies and propaganda
on europe
on israel
on iraq
and especially 911 they were part of the cover up operation |
Of course they were, part of the 3,141,592 people involved, none of whom has come near to blowing the whistle. An amazing operation! |
No. Not part of the original cover up. Just now made up of Labour government lackeys in senior BBC management who will do anything not to make life difficult for B(liar) by allowing anything to be aired that exposes the American government for the bunch of criminals that they really are. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 4:09 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | do not watch the bbc#otherwise known as the bush and blair corporation
it is nothing but lies and propaganda
on europe
on israel
on iraq
and especially 911 they were part of the cover up operation |
Of course they were, part of the 3,141,592 people involved, none of whom has come near to blowing the whistle. An amazing operation! |
who are these 3,141,592?
there were only about 40-50 involved
only 1 editor at the BBC needs to be in the loop and even then its NEED TO KNOW and what he doesnt need to lnow he wont be told. The entire operation is 40-50 people and when finally they are brought to trial you will see that apologists like yourself were living in cloud cukoo land.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 11:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | do not watch the bbc#otherwise known as the bush and blair corporation
it is nothing but lies and propaganda
on europe
on israel
on iraq
and especially 911 they were part of the cover up operation |
Of course they were, part of the 3,141,592 people involved, none of whom has come near to blowing the whistle. An amazing operation! |
who are these 3,141,592?
there were only about 40-50 involved
only 1 editor at the BBC needs to be in the loop and even then its NEED TO KNOW and what he doesnt need to lnow he wont be told. The entire operation is 40-50 people and when finally they are brought to trial you will see that apologists like yourself were living in cloud cukoo land. |
The naivety of you guys really is amazing! Do you honestly think that one editor controls the BBC's entire output of news on all its TV and radio channels? And that editors will blindly follow instructions to cover up a news item on something as big as 9/11 without questioning it? As for the others involved, that depends on which particular fairy story takes your fancy, but all of them need a large number of people to be involved, modifying planes to be flown by remote control, invisibly installing demolition charges throughout three skyscrapers, predicting who was going to take the flights studying their personal backgrounds and voice patterns so as to be able to deceive their closest relatives in fake phone calls, designing, building, launching and operating hitherto unknown beam weapons into space, building and firing a fake airliner/missile at the Pentagon, subverting the security services, the Air Force, all the pathologists, NIST, ASCE, air crash investigators, every structural engineer in the world, all those who did an amazing job faking all the pictures and video taken by all the news services and anyone who happened to have a camera in NY, the WTC insurers and so on. Then of course there are all the people faking 7/7 and other attacks in the UK, Spain and elsewhere. Actually, there are probably only 40/50 people who are not involved! |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 11:44 am Post subject: |
|
|
Bushwacker i know your mission is to suppress the truth
but you never make a plausible case
London 7/7 the israeli company verint which controls london underground security kept its 1200 employees busy on mock drills on the day
so only the individual who placed the bombs and only the directors of verint and a handful of people who pulled the cctv from the hard drives.
The london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take mn more?
An if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death.
The official story for 911 is 19 people did it.
As is well known the same israeli company controls security at Logan and Dulles airports and again there is no cctv.
Please explain to me why mohammed atta was good buddies with jack abramof the top republican fundraiser and close bush associate?
does nothing make you question what you believe?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sat May 05, 2007 11:39 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | Bushwacker i know your mission is to suppress the truth
but you never make a plausible case
London 7/7 the israeli company verint which controls london underground security kept its 1200 employees busy on mock drills on the day
so only the individual who placed the bombs and only the directors of verint and a handful of people who pulled the cctv from the hard drives.
The london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take mn more?
An if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death.
The official story for 911 is 19 people did it.
As is well known the same israeli company controls security at Logan and Dulles airports and again there is no cctv.
Please explain to me why mohammed atta was good buddies with jack abramof the top republican fundraiser and close bush associate?
does nothing make you question what you believe? |
Your misrepresentations certainly will not make me question it!
The Visor Consultants drills were paper exercises, nothing happened on the ground.
You have no idea whether their client was Verint.
Verint provide the equipment, it is most unlikely they operate it.
You have no idea how much CCTV footage is available, you only know how much has been released.
If it was a false flag operation involving only four people, it means that four people planned to blow themselves up in order to establish a false story - are you serious?
You think Mossad operatives would happily blow themselves up? - are you serious?
Again, no CCTV released to the public does not mean there is none.
Atta allegedly going to one of Jack Abramoff's casino boats does not amount to them being good buddies.
Abramoff is not a "close Bush associate" - only one meeting between them has been proved to have occurrred, which was on 9th May 2001.
What sort of truth do you think you promote by this stuff? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 7:07 am Post subject: |
|
|
you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more?
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Long Tooth
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 306
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:14 am Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more? |
His 'mission' is not to answer any serious questions honestly, his pet hobby is to misquote people.
You see people of his Ilk mass posting, and ridiculing serious questions, all in the aim of putting newcomers off the site, why else would someone post continious smoke and mirrors.
when it asks for a link, and one is supplied, watch it wriggle and squirm, quite hilarious really.
The scale on which insurancecompanies base there calcualations of an event happening has a name (of which escapes me for now), the scale used to calculate a drill happening at 3 tube staions at excatly the minute was calculated as somthing having 31 zeros at the end of its number, ie 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0 to 1. that seems a miniscule number when compared to the odds of bushwacker telling a truth or engaging in honest debate 
My local MP even stated in the local paper that his train ride to london was delayed by hours, due to security measures, 3 hours before the first blast!!! obviously the sting was already in motion 
I wouldant bother wasting too much time with the red herring brigade such as bushwacker, an odd one liner to highlight his stupidity is enough for newcomers to see him for what he really is.
He attacked every one of my first 6 posts, funnily enough the odd one liners has shut him up apart from his odd brisk feeble attempt to smear and silence me now. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:34 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more? |
Where have I misquoted you? Have you any comment on anything other than the number involved in a false flag 7/7 operation?
As for that, I see I have to spell it out for you.
Official Story
4 radicalised Moslems with some assistance from outsiders travel to London and blow themselves on tubes and a bus.
False Flag operation
1) To have little more than four men involved, those men, you suggest Mossad operatives, decide to create a false flag operation a blow themselves up having established false identities that will deceive any police or MI5 investigation. Does that sound very likely? Why would anyone, Mossad operative or not, sacrifice themselves for the cause of Bush/Blair/Neocons/Zionists/Illuminati/whatever?
2) What is usually suggested is that the official story is entirely wrong, no one travelled to London, bombs were planted under the trains and on the bus, Visor Consultants were involved, the innocent patsies were done away with and the police investigation is a sham. For this you would need operatives to abduct the four innocent Moslems, murder them and dispose of the bodies, operatives to lay a false trail from their homes to Luton, a technician to fake the Luton and Kings Cross CCTV footage for 7/7 and the earlier practice run, operatives in infiltrate Underground facilities, work out which trains be running the following day and would be leaving Kings Cross at the requisite time and attach time bombs underneath them, ditto with the bus, Visor Consultants staff of course, all the police involved in the fake investigation, and the scientists to mis-identify the DNA samples. Some versions require more, driving cars to divert the bus, moving people about in Tavistock Square and possibly Kingstar are also involved.
If you think four people could conduct a false flag operation, please explain how. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 10:56 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Long Tooth wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more? |
His 'mission' is not to answer any serious questions honestly, his pet hobby is to misquote people.
You see people of his Ilk mass posting, and ridiculing serious questions, all in the aim of putting newcomers off the site, why else would someone post continious smoke and mirrors.
when it asks for a link, and one is supplied, watch it wriggle and squirm, quite hilarious really.
The scale on which insurancecompanies base there calcualations of an event happening has a name (of which escapes me for now), the scale used to calculate a drill happening at 3 tube staions at excatly the minute was calculated as somthing having 31 zeros at the end of its number, ie 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0 to 1. that seems a miniscule number when compared to the odds of bushwacker telling a truth or engaging in honest debate
My local MP even stated in the local paper that his train ride to london was delayed by hours, due to security measures, 3 hours before the first blast!!! obviously the sting was already in motion
I wouldant bother wasting too much time with the red herring brigade such as bushwacker, an odd one liner to highlight his stupidity is enough for newcomers to see him for what he really is.
He attacked every one of my first 6 posts, funnily enough the odd one liners has shut him up apart from his odd brisk feeble attempt to smear and silence me now. |
You really are a dreadful liar, I first replied to your fifth post, the first time you ventured into Critics' Corner, the only place I am allowed to post, and you now prefer to steer clear of.
I am still waiting for you to provide the evidence that the CIA sponsored Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, you said there is lots, but you have not managed to find any yet. It is quite amazing how all these radical Moslems think Al Qaeda is doing a wonderful job if it is really just a CIA front, I guess they are all a bit thick, eh? Or perhaps there are no such folk as radical Moslems, they are all just CIA operatives, is that it? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:02 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | Bushwacker i know your mission is to suppress the truth
but you never make a plausible case
London 7/7 the israeli company verint which controls london underground security kept its 1200 employees busy on mock drills on the day
so only the individual who placed the bombs and only the directors of verint and a handful of people who pulled the cctv from the hard drives.
The london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take mn more?
An if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death.
The official story for 911 is 19 people did it.
As is well known the same israeli company controls security at Logan and Dulles airports and again there is no cctv.
Please explain to me why mohammed atta was good buddies with jack abramof the top republican fundraiser and close bush associate?
does nothing make you question what you believe? |
Your misrepresentations certainly will not make me question it!
The Visor Consultants drills were paper exercises, nothing happened on the ground.
That's beside the crucial point. The extraordinary 'coincidence' you are deliberately ignoring is that the paper drills were carried out at the very time of the attack and involved the very same three underground stations - a coincidence with infinitesimally small odds.
You have no idea whether their client was Verint.
Verint provide the equipment, it is most unlikely they operate it.
Quite so, but irrelevant. There is still the possibility that someone from Verint could have advised on how to disable the CCTV. After all, Verint DID provide the cameras!
You have no idea how much CCTV footage is available, you only know how much has been released.
Yes, puzzingly little, given the need to reassure the general public that the four men had, indeed, been the real terrorists. No date-stamped video was ever made public proving the men in London that day.
If it was a false flag operation involving only four people, it means that four people planned to blow themselves up in order to establish a false story - are you serious?
You are deliberately distorting Stelios69's argument.
You think Mossad operatives would happily blow themselves up? - are you serious?
Stelios69 never said that. You invented a straw men argument in order to knock it down and create the illusion that you had scored a point over Stelios69.
Again, no CCTV released to the public does not mean there is none.
No, but it remains HIGHLY suspicious that very little was shown, given that much more should have been available.
Atta allegedly going to one of Jack Abramoff's casino boats does not amount to them being good buddies.
True, but again you miss the point. Why would someone planning to commit suicide in a couple of days want to make some money gambling?
Abramoff is not a "close Bush associate" - only one meeting between them has been proved to have occurrred, which was on 9th May 2001.
Oh really? E-mails written by Abramhoff to Kim Eisler, national editor of Washingtonian magazine, describe meeting Bush “in almost a dozen settings,” and details how he was personally invited to President Bush’s private ranch in Crawford, Texas, for a gathering of Bush fundraisers in 2003. Abramoff did not attend, citing a religious observance.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/08/exclusive-abramoff-emails/
Here's a photo of them smiling together:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27078
Here's another one at the supposed 'only' meeting:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://thinkprogress.org/wp-con tent/uploads/2006/02/abramoff_bush_red.JPG&imgrefurl=http://thinkprogr ess.org/2006/02/11/bush-abramoff-photo-1/&h=227&w=507&sz=22&hl=en&star t=4&um=1&tbnid=05v4XSk1thO34M:&tbnh=59&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAbr amoff%2BBush%2527s%2Bfriend%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
Confirmed by Time Magazine:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://thinkprogress.org/wp-con tent/uploads/2006/02/abramoff_bush_red.JPG&imgrefurl=http://thinkprogr ess.org/2006/02/11/bush-abramoff-photo-1/&h=227&w=507&sz=22&hl=en&star t=4&um=1&tbnid=05v4XSk1thO34M:&tbnh=59&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAbr amoff%2BBush%2527s%2Bfriend%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
What sort of truth do you think you promote by this stuff?
What sort of sloppy debunking do you call this stuff?
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Long Tooth
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 306
|
| Posted: Sun May 06, 2007 11:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: | | Long Tooth wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more? |
His 'mission' is not to answer any serious questions honestly, his pet hobby is to misquote people.
You see people of his Ilk mass posting, and ridiculing serious questions, all in the aim of putting newcomers off the site, why else would someone post continious smoke and mirrors.
when it asks for a link, and one is supplied, watch it wriggle and squirm, quite hilarious really.
The scale on which insurancecompanies base there calcualations of an event happening has a name (of which escapes me for now), the scale used to calculate a drill happening at 3 tube staions at excatly the minute was calculated as somthing having 31 zeros at the end of its number, ie 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0 to 1. that seems a miniscule number when compared to the odds of bushwacker telling a truth or engaging in honest debate
My local MP even stated in the local paper that his train ride to london was delayed by hours, due to security measures, 3 hours before the first blast!!! obviously the sting was already in motion
I wouldant bother wasting too much time with the red herring brigade such as bushwacker, an odd one liner to highlight his stupidity is enough for newcomers to see him for what he really is.
He attacked every one of my first 6 posts, funnily enough the odd one liners has shut him up apart from his odd brisk feeble attempt to smear and silence me now. |
You really are a dreadful liar, I first replied to your fifth post, the first time you ventured into Critics' Corner, the only place I am allowed to post, and you now prefer to steer clear of.
I am still waiting for you to provide the evidence that the CIA sponsored Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, you said there is lots, but you have not managed to find any yet. It is quite amazing how all these radical Moslems think Al Qaeda is doing a wonderful job if it is really just a CIA front, I guess they are all a bit thick, eh? Or perhaps there are no such folk as radical Moslems, they are all just CIA operatives, is that it? |
Its you who lie constantly and misquote people. i posted you the link, check back throught he post, its there.
you are a time waster, thats why i dont go to the idiots corner to debate you. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 12:12 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Micpsi wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | Bushwacker i know your mission is to suppress the truth
but you never make a plausible case
London 7/7 the israeli company verint which controls london underground security kept its 1200 employees busy on mock drills on the day
so only the individual who placed the bombs and only the directors of verint and a handful of people who pulled the cctv from the hard drives.
The london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take mn more?
An if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death.
The official story for 911 is 19 people did it.
As is well known the same israeli company controls security at Logan and Dulles airports and again there is no cctv.
Please explain to me why mohammed atta was good buddies with jack abramof the top republican fundraiser and close bush associate?
does nothing make you question what you believe? |
Your misrepresentations certainly will not make me question it!
The Visor Consultants drills were paper exercises, nothing happened on the ground.
That's beside the crucial point. The extraordinary 'coincidence' you are deliberately ignoring is that the paper drills were carried out at the very time of the attack and involved the very same three underground stations - a coincidence with infinitesimally small odds.
It is not at all beside the point I was answering, the claim that 1200 people were kept busy by these exercises.
Peter Power, when he had got over his initial excitement, said that the scenario was very similar but not identical. Calculations involving all Underground stations are not valid, anyone planning such an operation would use only the inner ones, but it certainly is long odds. However, things do happen at long odds, and what no conspiracist has yet suggested is what it could possibly prove, why would Power rush on to national radio to talk about it, and what was the point of the exercise, given that it was only on paper?
You have no idea whether their client was Verint.
Verint provide the equipment, it is most unlikely they operate it.
Quite so, but irrelevant. There is still the possibility that someone from Verint could have advised on how to disable the CCTV. After all, Verint DID provide the cameras!
Sony provide my TV, but never operate it! stelios69 is simply indulging in wild speculation with zero evidence.
You have no idea how much CCTV footage is available, you only know how much has been released.
Yes, puzzingly little, given the need to reassure the general public that the four men had, indeed, been the real terrorists. No date-stamped video was ever made public proving the men in London that day.
It is not puzzling at all, the public does not doubt they were the terrorists, and it is never the practice for the police simply to release all the evidence they have. They release evidence for specific reasons, mostly to gain further information.
If it was a false flag operation involving only four people, it means that four people planned to blow themselves up in order to establish a false story - are you serious?
You are deliberately distorting Stelios69's argument.
What is his argument if it is not that? I ask him that above
You think Mossad operatives would happily blow themselves up? - are you serious?
Stelios69 never said that. You invented a straw men argument in order to knock it down and create the illusion that you had scored a point over Stelios69.
stelios69 should make clear what he means. Like so many conspiracists, he likes to float a vague idea, in this case of Mossad involvement, but it has no substance to it
Again, no CCTV released to the public does not mean there is none.
No, but it remains HIGHLY suspicious that very little was shown, given that much more should have been available.
No it does not, see above.
Atta allegedly going to one of Jack Abramoff's casino boats does not amount to them being good buddies.
True, but again you miss the point. Why would someone planning to commit suicide in a couple of days want to make some money gambling?
You miss the point of gambling, people do not gamble to make money, they gamble because they get a kick out of it. They will do it with matchsticks if necessary.
Abramoff is not a "close Bush associate" - only one meeting between them has been proved to have occurrred, which was on 9th May 2001.
Oh really? E-mails written by Abramhoff to Kim Eisler, national editor of Washingtonian magazine, describe meeting Bush “in almost a dozen settings,” and details how he was personally invited to President Bush’s private ranch in Crawford, Texas, for a gathering of Bush fundraisers in 2003. Abramoff did not attend, citing a religious observance.
http://thinkprogress.org/2006/02/08/exclusive-abramoff-emails/
Here's a photo of them smiling together:
http://www.citizensforethics.org/node/27078
Here's another one at the supposed 'only' meeting:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://thinkprogress.org/wp-con tent/uploads/2006/02/abramoff_bush_red.JPG&imgrefurl=http://thinkprogr ess.org/2006/02/11/bush-abramoff-photo-1/&h=227&w=507&sz=22&hl=en&star t=4&um=1&tbnid=05v4XSk1thO34M:&tbnh=59&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAbr amoff%2BBush%2527s%2Bfriend%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
Confirmed by Time Magazine:
http://images.google.com/imgres?imgurl=http://thinkprogress.org/wp-con tent/uploads/2006/02/abramoff_bush_red.JPG&imgrefurl=http://thinkprogr ess.org/2006/02/11/bush-abramoff-photo-1/&h=227&w=507&sz=22&hl=en&star t=4&um=1&tbnid=05v4XSk1thO34M:&tbnh=59&tbnw=131&prev=/images%3Fq%3DAbr amoff%2BBush%2527s%2Bfriend%26svnum%3D10%26um%3D1%26hl%3Den%26sa%3DN
Yes, Abramoff would say that, and equally predictably Bush would deny it. One meeting can be proved to have occurred, there may have been others, but even if they did meet a dozen times that hardly makes him "a close Bush associate" does it?
What sort of truth do you think you promote by this stuff?
What sort of sloppy debunking do you call this stuff?
I reckon it is good enough to show that stelios69 is at best extremely careless of facts, and you have been unable to rescue him.
|
|
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 12:15 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Long Tooth wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: | | Long Tooth wrote: | | stelios69 wrote: | you are a joker mate
why dont you answer me instead of misquoting me?
the official story says the london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take many more? |
His 'mission' is not to answer any serious questions honestly, his pet hobby is to misquote people.
You see people of his Ilk mass posting, and ridiculing serious questions, all in the aim of putting newcomers off the site, why else would someone post continious smoke and mirrors.
when it asks for a link, and one is supplied, watch it wriggle and squirm, quite hilarious really.
The scale on which insurancecompanies base there calcualations of an event happening has a name (of which escapes me for now), the scale used to calculate a drill happening at 3 tube staions at excatly the minute was calculated as somthing having 31 zeros at the end of its number, ie 1,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,0 to 1. that seems a miniscule number when compared to the odds of bushwacker telling a truth or engaging in honest debate
My local MP even stated in the local paper that his train ride to london was delayed by hours, due to security measures, 3 hours before the first blast!!! obviously the sting was already in motion
I wouldant bother wasting too much time with the red herring brigade such as bushwacker, an odd one liner to highlight his stupidity is enough for newcomers to see him for what he really is.
He attacked every one of my first 6 posts, funnily enough the odd one liners has shut him up apart from his odd brisk feeble attempt to smear and silence me now. |
You really are a dreadful liar, I first replied to your fifth post, the first time you ventured into Critics' Corner, the only place I am allowed to post, and you now prefer to steer clear of.
I am still waiting for you to provide the evidence that the CIA sponsored Al Qaeda in Afghanistan, you said there is lots, but you have not managed to find any yet. It is quite amazing how all these radical Moslems think Al Qaeda is doing a wonderful job if it is really just a CIA front, I guess they are all a bit thick, eh? Or perhaps there are no such folk as radical Moslems, they are all just CIA operatives, is that it? |
Its you who lie constantly and misquote people. i posted you the link, check back throught he post, its there.
you are a time waster, thats why i dont go to the idiots corner to debate you. |
Lying again, you posted irrelevant links to try to make some sort of case, and claimed there was lots of evidence but failed to produce it. As you have again. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
karlos
Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Feb 2007
Posts: 2516
Location: london
|
| Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 3:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
| Bushwacker wrote: |
You think Mossad operatives would happily blow themselves up? - are you serious?
|
whereas i said
if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death
I never suggested that a mossad operative would commit suicide. I suggested they planted the bombs prior to the event being staged. And they could be trusted not to talk about it.
Let me explain to you Bushwan*er your mission or possibly even your job description is to throw a spanner in the works.
But in reality you actually encourage us all to tighten up our knowledge and in fact you only succeed in making all of us stronger advocates for the truth.
So bushvanker you are doing a good job. Give yourself a big hand.
_________________
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Bushwacker
Relentless Limpet Shill
Joined: 07 Sep 2006
Posts: 1628
|
| Posted: Mon May 07, 2007 5:49 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| stelios69 wrote: | | Bushwacker wrote: |
You think Mossad operatives would happily blow themselves up? - are you serious?
|
whereas i said
if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death
I never suggested that a mossad operative would commit suicide. I suggested they planted the bombs prior to the event being staged. And they could be trusted not to talk about it.
Let me explain to you Bushwan*er your mission or possibly even your job description is to throw a spanner in the works.
But in reality you actually encourage us all to tighten up our knowledge and in fact you only succeed in making all of us stronger advocates for the truth.
So bushvanker you are doing a good job. Give yourself a big hand. |
I glad I am encouraging you to think more clearly about what you believe, because it is difficult to argue against the incoherent versions you tend to put forward.
Now can you try to be much more accurate with your facts, you have already been shown to be very careless about what happened on that day, but you are also very careless even about the most obvious. For instance, you say above that you suggested that Mossad operatives planted bombs before the event being staged, and that may be what you were thinking, but it certainly was not what you said, which was:
"The london bombings could have been done by as little as 4 people according to the official story so why would the false flag attack take mn more?
An if mossad operatives were hired then they would be sworn to secrecy on pain of death."
Now try to come forward with some plausible theory about how bombs could be planted to explode the way they did.
Are you intending to answer my points about the number of people involved, or do you now accept you were mistaken? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
