CNN clip reports no evidence a plane crashed at the Pentagon

[Micpsi]

This footage from CNN was broadcast only once. Unfamiliar of course with Boeing 757-200 planes that are designed so that their 124 ft 10 in wings automatically fold back neatly and squeeze into 16ft holes when required, the reporter stated categorically that he saw no evidence of a plane having crashed at the Pentagon on 9/11. No surprise therefore that we never saw the footage aired again! I wonder whether the reporter still works for CNN? If he does, no doubt his new job is one where he does not need to trust his own eyes.
http://www.vloggingtheapocalypse.com/view_...2c990b0a82652dc

[kookomula]

When asked about this I'm pretty sure he said that his words were twisted/taken out of context. What he actually said/meant was that he could not see any evidence on the lawn not that there was no evidence that a plane had crashed.

[johndoe]

hmmm.......the entire pentagon seems a little odd.

if the us government were perfectly okay with flying two airliners into the wtc why were the not okay with doing it to the pentagon?

why once you have hijacked a third aircraft after flying two into buildings already do you opt for some other means?

[David WJ Sherlock]

[Micpsi]

[flamesong]

I don't have a fixed view on what happened at the Pentagon but to answer johndoe's point, perhaps an airliner wasn't used simply because it would have been seen by the Pentagon's evidently sophisticated defence system as 'unfriendly' and would have been automatically shot down by an unconscious missile. Clearly, that would not do.

[blackcat]

McIntyre seized on his use of the word "near" to try to undo the damage his honest report did. He says he was remarking that a plane had not hit "near" the Pentagon and that he meant he was was referring to a possible crash not "at" the Pentagon but "near" it. His subsequent words about the pieces etc. render this "explanation" totally false but that is the way of things with 9/11. Any old * will do.