Media Hoax

[Fred]

The media's role in the 9/11 attacks should be examined. Is that a controversy?

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/414324/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_impossib le_camera_angles_impossible/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/533907/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_when_whe re_and_how_did_they_film_th/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/542884/cnn_hoax_if_by_land_cnn_hoax_if_b y_sea/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/541194/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_more_pro of_for_the_hard_headed/

[Micpsi]

Your claim have been busted. The CNN ghost footage was CLEARLY taken at a greater elevation and closer to the South Tower than the park video footage, explaining why the lamp post was not visible in it and why buildings look different or are not visible and rendering invalid any inference of fakery in the CNN footage based upon these differences. I myself pointed this out weeks ago in a thread making the same half-baked claim.

[Fred]

And when you go up, what do you see 19 Rector Street. What's missing from the CNN Video? 19 Rector Street. The CNN Video is fake. If you are closer to the south tower, what happens? The red building drops behind the top of the Whitehall building. Which means what?

It means the CNN video is fake.

[iro]

has anyone asked cnn where they took the footage from?

[Fallious]

[iro]

[flamesong]

[flamesong]

FAO Fred.

Along with your gang, you have made such a mess of this forum it is impossible to know where to post. There doesn't seem to be a single thread which has remained on topic.

Not being familiar with your neighbourhood (the 'u' should confirm this), I would be obliged if you would mark the errant 19 Rector Street on this aerial photograph - without resizing it or adding any music!

[flamesong]

I'm bumping this because whilst all the CNN fakirs are shouting about lam posts (sic) and 19 Rector Street - not one of them has stepped forward to mark the aforementioned address on an aerial photograph.

[Fred]

If you were familar with New York, you wouldn't be defending the fake CNN video. 19 Rector Street is right here, in the line of sight. Perhaps Mi6 should have coordinated better with the other intelligence agencies before making such a stupid mistake. I guess arrogance and incompetence go together. Isn't that right John 54 Marky White?

[Fred]

Mess of the forum? This is a cesspool of lies and disinformation with Chek, Stefan, and the sock puppet John Marky 54 White shouting down all the real information, and putting all the actual research into the "controversial" section. It's not a truth site at all. Of course you know that Flamesong.

If you were familar with New York, you wouldn't be defending the fake CNN video. 19 Rector Street is right here, in the line of sight. Perhaps Mi6 should have coordinated better with the other intelligence agencies before making such a stupid mistake. I guess arrogance and incompetence go together. Isn't that right John 54 Marky White?

[david carmichael]

[flamesong]

Thank you.

Now, I have a problem.

The building you circled as 19 Rector Street, is enlarged by 200% here:



To my eyes it doesn't resemble the images I've managed to find of 19 Rector Street:

Source:http://members.aol.com/smurphy110/down/19rector.htm


Source:http://www.nycjpg.com/2003/pictures/jpg/0711.p.jpg

[EmptyBee]

This photo makes things a bit clearer I hope - I believe Fred is correct in identifying the building in question as 19 Rector Street.

[flamesong]

Excellent photo, Empty Bee!!!

That just about wraps it up!

No missing building, no missing lamp posts. And the video was shot from a boat - that's why it is so shakey!

End of freakin' story!

Mornington Cresent!

[david carmichael]

[Fred]

The missing building is right here, Flamer. It's visible from a boat, and not from CNN. That's an easy way to show the CNN video is fake. Its right there in the real video, and it's not there in the fake video from CNN. Look in the lower right of the top photo. BUSTED! The CNN Video is a proven fake.

[Stefan]

Just checking I'm not hallucinating here -

On the very first thread on this topic I pointed out you could see the tip of the building over the foilage.

It's still there.

50 threads later and it's still right there...

[EmptyBee]

There's another building that could close down the angle via triangulation ever closer that's on the right hand side of the frame of the CNN shot at its widest:



I believe it is this building (unsure of the name):



The above photo was cropped from this larger image:



Aerial view visible on Google Maps here

I think it's very likely that the view was from a boat, given that's a logical place to find sightseers with camcorders.

[John White]

[Fred]

Sockpuppet John White / Marky 54 has already been exposed


Super Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Total posts: 1477
[2.21% of total / 5.79 posts per day]
Find all posts by marky 54

All of these videos show the CNN video to be fake.


http://www.metacafe.com/watch/414324/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_impossib le_camera_angles_impossible/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/533907/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_when_whe re_and_how_did_they_film_th/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/542884/cnn_hoax_if_by_land_cnn_hoax_if_b y_sea/

http://www.metacafe.com/watch/541194/cnn_fake_footage_blasted_more_pro of_for_the_hard_headed/

[EmptyBee]

So your claim is that John and Mark are the same person based on the fact that they misspelled the same word and have similar volumes of posts, despite the fact that they have completely different posting styles and have been met in person by members of this site?

That makes about as much sense as suggesting that the entirety of Manhattan was faked by CNN on 9/11. Oh wait...

[marky 54]

[Fred]

John White aka "Marky 54", it must be time to chek your fallious stefan.


Link