| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
 Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:39 pm Post subject: As No Planers are Banned For Rudness Twaddle Continues |
 |
|
| Will there be an even-handed policy here? Or is banning simply a tool to silence no-planers? |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:47 pm Post subject: |
|
|
So, just getting this straight fred, if you were admin of an internet forum, you would ban people for using the word "twaddle"?
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 12:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Is tish and fipsy an acceptable alternative?
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Micpsi
Moderate Poster
Joined: 13 Feb 2007
Posts: 505
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 7:33 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Fred is trying to get himself banned. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | Is tish and fipsy an acceptable alternative? |
Steady on DM, sir. There are limits after all, particularly if a lady person were to stumble across this thread.
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:47 pm Post subject: Re: As No Planers are Banned For Rudness Twaddle Continues |
|
|
| Fred wrote: | | Will there be an even-handed policy here? Or is banning simply a tool to silence no-planers? |
hold on a minute, who typed the stuff that got the no planer band?
i certainly wasnt forcing them nor was anyone here.
i understand that sometimes people snap or lose it and post something naughty, but to do it almost every post is surely only the fault of the person typing it and has nothing to do with keeping npt'ers silent.
he types abusive/rude comments we get the blame when hes banned, nice logic fred. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 10:58 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Who have we "lost" so far?
David Carmicheal
Schizprenogenic thingy/thought criminal/prole art threat
Who killed Bambi/TWSU3
Ally
All fine examples of members the site desperatley needs (sic)
We've lost a fair few critics too: for the same reasons
| Micpsi wrote: | | Fred is trying to get himself banned. |
Hmmm I don't think so. A couple of weekends ago, Fred would probably of welcomed the cathartic release, but right now it seems to me he's trying to play it coy. He's skating close to the edge though, but I reckon that's mostly despite himself. Maybe he's actually listening to the advice he's getting on his blog now?
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Fred
9/11 Truth critic
Joined: 26 Apr 2007
Posts: 321
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:45 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| And as expected the replies consist entirely of the shill accounts. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
OK, maybe Fred IS trying to get himself banned
I don't mind, and its going to work. If disgracing himself over here is what it takes so that he can skulk on his blog and feel "victimised and oppressed" its his jollies to seek out
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sat May 12, 2007 11:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Check this one out:
| Fred wrote: | Look, Ian, if you're going to ban my supporters, call the evidence-based theories contentious, and allow shills like marky iro and john white and chek to post here, it's clear your goal is to stifle 9/11 truth.
As Joe Craine noted, the shills have several goals;
1. Bury legitimate posts. YOu, as a video poster, may not see that so much. I as a poster, run into to it constantly!
2. Drain resources from us. I can't be posting on sites where newcomers come with their questions if I am wasting time on a stupid question.
Your banning of Schizo, and Bambi and leaving up the notorious shills speaks volumes about your motives. |
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| John White wrote: | Check this one out:
| Fred wrote: | Look, Ian, if you're going to ban my supporters, call the evidence-based theories contentious, and allow shills like marky iro and john white and chek to post here, it's clear your goal is to stifle 9/11 truth.
As Joe Craine noted, the shills have several goals;
1. Bury legitimate posts. YOu, as a video poster, may not see that so much. I as a poster, run into to it constantly!
2. Drain resources from us. I can't be posting on sites where newcomers come with their questions if I am wasting time on a stupid question.
Your banning of Schizo, and Bambi and leaving up the notorious shills speaks volumes about your motives. |
|
its easy to tell when a theory is rubbish, the only way it stands up is if you silence those questioning it.
what fred is asking for really is the equvelent to sacking people when they speak out against the offical version, and thats happened a few times as we know.
i bet fred agrees that rosie o'donnell should of been treated how she was for questioning the offical version, he treats people the same who question his theory and sometimes sounds like o'reilly, mmmm i wonder. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
John White
Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006
Posts: 3187
Location: Here to help!
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:22 am Post subject: |
|
|
Being as Fred said this about asking questions about building 7 (which Rosie did)
| Fred wrote: | | Since there is no crime in an owner deciding to demolish his own building, which is what Larry Silverstein claims he did with WTC 7 it's silly for the supposed 9/11 Truth Movement to keep harping on building 7. No one died there. What's the crime? |
And Rosie was NOT saying the CNN footage was faked...one has to wonder
_________________
Free your Self and Free the World |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 12:53 am Post subject: |
|
|
Fred - You've started a thread about me apparently being rude, and then promptlyaccused everyone that has posted on it as being a shill.
Does the word 'irony' mean anything to you?
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
marky 54
Mega Poster
Joined: 18 Aug 2006
Posts: 3293
|
| Posted: Sun May 13, 2007 4:19 am Post subject: |
|
|
| John White wrote: | Being as Fred said this about asking questions about building 7 (which Rosie did)
| Fred wrote: | | Since there is no crime in an owner deciding to demolish his own building, which is what Larry Silverstein claims he did with WTC 7 it's silly for the supposed 9/11 Truth Movement to keep harping on building 7. No one died there. What's the crime? |
And Rosie was NOT saying the CNN footage was faked...one has to wonder |
ah the diversion. hey dont look into building 7, come and have a look at this instead. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
