Can someone explain what the UFO is at 5:54 in this footage

[911 a past gone mad]

?


Link

[telecasterisation]

A bird.

[911 a past gone mad]

[telecasterisation]

[911 a past gone mad]

[telecasterisation]

Yep, a bird, no question.

[ian neal]

If you are referring to the object seen moving across the screen with 5.54 left to run, I would say tele is correct, not that I really care

But instead of accusing others of trolling and being paid to post, why not tell us what you think we can learn from this video.

[Long Tooth]

[ian neal]

FYI 911apgm is now banned until his/her next incarnation

[Long Tooth]

[zark]

why does the building shift about 400ft to screen left.

mark 1 --- 16secs
mark2 --- 1min 31secs

The building has jumped left screen.

1min 39sec -- the gap in the smoke right screen.

Oh deary, deary me.

________________

1min 53secs ... watch the building right screen .. see the smoke moving left.

__________________

now watch again from

1min 23sec - 28secs

you can clearly see the gap and the smoke rising either side of this 'magical space'.

[telecasterisation]

[kc]

Zark dont do research tele. In fact, I have a quote from him where he spouted "Your scientific approach to 9/11 isnt wanted" when someone was taking him to task over the "lazer beam frickin sharks" he thinks brought the towers down.

[utopiated]

There's footage of that item from even further back if I recall - which makes it a bit far fetched to be a bird. But it does look like a bird.

If it flies like a bird, lays eggs like a bird and has feathers like a bird - it's probably an anomalous object.

[Stefan]

Just watched it.

A bird. Absolutley no doubt.

This is just getting silly. At lest the "ream of paper/orb" footage was abiguous and hard to make out. This is a bird right down to it's flapping wings.

Is this really what 9/11 "research" has come to???

[ian neal]

911apgm was so unconvincing I suspect he was secretly a supporter of Steven Jones playing a double bluff.

[zark]

[zark]

[telecasterisation]

I was on a bus when 911 first hit British TV screens. I walked in the front door to find my wife glued to the news, the coverage of the collapse was riveting.

The video footage was very graphic, and at the time, very 'real'.

In the subsequent years, we have watched the same footage again and again. More has joined it, footage we never saw, different angles, from apartment windows, strange angles, from the tops of buildings, from a park miles away.

The obvious thing that links all these clips together is the fact they were apparently of the same event. However, the other point often overlooked is that virtually without exception, every clip now has a strange hovering UFO, or a missing aircraft, or a dissolving spire, or a suspect fireball, or a soundtrack that is at odds with what we see.

We can no longer simply watch it for what it is and believe what we see.

The point we have to remember, is that none of this footage can be trusted. We must move to a different place and accept, it is ALL potentially pigswill.

[John White]

[ian neal]

Don't call people nonce (or similar) zark or you will be banned

[marky 54]

[zark]

[marky 54]

[marky 54]

[marky 54]

or watch the video over and watch the building on the right in relation to the left building and watch the way the spire moves, as this proves what your claiming is wrong.

also the smoke rising up and to the left also proves your claim is wrong as well as the moving traffic in the foreground, now if you watch at 1.40
5.34 and 7.38 and take into consideration all the points i raised, then you will realsie that i didnt make sense and i just wasted 10mins of your time like you have mine.

[chek]

[Craig W]

[kc]

Craig you forgot:

They're actually believers of the OCT and have just decided to wind up and distract the movement for a laugh in their spare time.

[gruts]