View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
kc Moderate Poster
Joined: 27 Oct 2006 Posts: 359
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 10:30 am Post subject: Should no planers be consigned to critics corner? |
|
|
As no planers continue to pour scorn on the ideas of CD or LIHOP in any sense, I see more and more posts from them containing more factual "debunking" than anything the critics come up with. Is it time to classify them as critics and move their posts accordingly? |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 6:55 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Well if they walk like ducks ... though actually any association even by way of analogy is being grossly unfair to ducks.
What I would agree with is ruthless pruning of their multiple threads, though without the not very practical full-time attention from the mods, that's not really achievable either.
Within the limitations of this type of message board, I'm not sure there is any easy answer. It's the problem of free speech in a free society in microcosm.
We'll just have to be satisfied with exposing their ideas for the dross they are. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
John White Site Admin
Joined: 27 Mar 2006 Posts: 3187 Location: Here to help!
|
Posted: Tue Jun 12, 2007 7:15 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I kind of view critics corner as the home of left brain prisoners (anally retentive in freudianism) and truth controversies as the home of right brain prisoners (that will be the anally expulsive, funnily enough): with a few notable exceptions, but thats generalisms for you
I would'nt want to go merging threads and so on particularily, as its better to show what NPT theorists are like when left to develop a natural habitat, though obviously I clear up messes elsewhere on the forum, as there is such a thing as too much fertalizer
I have toyed with the idea of creating a "NPT Theory greatest pwnings" thread, but have found that, on the whole, I can't be bothered. A quick search of relevant members posts delivers all the counter arguments one could require
Mind you, here's a hoopy bit of thinking I came across and added a comment to earlier today, when elsewhere on t'internet:
Quote: | Quote: | Also if the nose of the plane only appeared because the helicopter was moving to the left (I assume the CGIers didn't consider that a helicopter might actually be moving) then how come I can see the 'nose' appearing on a shot taken from the complete opposite side of the building? Or is that not the 'nose?
|
LOL! Very good point
"So good "they" cocked it up twice?"
Or is it possibly an object that is extremely bright (on account of being engulfed in flames): like the right hand engine?
In addition, if the object was simply a CGI error, why did it then continue to trail smoke on a parabola all the way to hitting the deck, caught from multiple angles? Why make all the extra effort? (not that its credible "they" did)
In fact, by trying to pull the same hoodwink from two different angles, the NPT theorists have shot themselves in the foot
Its funny that the video cuts out before showing the full descent of the "CGI error": kind of like NPT's own "fade to black". And I wonder if the tower with NYC's main transmitter stuck on the top of it being struck by the plane had anything to do with that momentary loss of signal? Surely not?
Just what is that extremely bright object flying through the sky? It couldn't be... could it?
...The right hand engine? |
_________________ Free your Self and Free the World |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|