| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
 Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:06 pm Post subject: Wanted: Spec on remote controlled planes |
 |
|
and what they are capable of.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:16 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Quote: | | and what they are capable of. |
Flying?
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:19 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | Quote: | | and what they are capable of. |
Flying? |
Hitting targets with the prcision of a missile? Where is your spec?
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:48 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | far more difficult to actually land a plane that point it at a specific heading. |
Nobody is talkin about landing it, but to hit it head on, I presume, would be very, very difficult to acheive. I just cannot believe that there is the technology to do that. As for using Global hawks, where are the global hawks in the footage of the towers being hit? They sure dont look like Global hawks to me? Come on, using a totally different type of plane was far too risky. Do you not think?
The trick was NOT TO USE PLANES and leave the rest to TV fakery and the witness imagination, a bit like how a novel works.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Disco_Destroyer
Trustworthy Freedom Fighter
Joined: 05 Sep 2006
Posts: 6342
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:53 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | | Dogsmilk wrote: | | Quote: | | and what they are capable of. |
Flying? |
Hitting targets with the prcision of a missile? Where is your spec? |
If they were A320 Airbuses it could have been Pilot Error 
http://www.crashdehabsheim.net/
_________________
'Come and see the violence inherent in the system.
Help, help, I'm being repressed!'
“The more you tighten your grip, the more Star Systems will slip through your fingers.”
www.myspace.com/disco_destroyer |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:52 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | | Dogsmilk wrote: | | far more difficult to actually land a plane that point it at a specific heading. |
Nobody is talkin about landing it, but to hit it head on, I presume, would be very, very difficult to acheive. I just cannot believe that there is the technology to do that. As for using Global hawks, where are the global hawks in the footage of the towers being hit? They sure dont look like Global hawks to me? Come on, using a totally different type of plane was far too risky. Do you not think?
The trick was NOT TO USE PLANES and leave the rest to TV fakery and the witness imagination, a bit like how a novel works. |
The point is, pointing an aircraft at a specific point isn't necessarily the hardest thing to do with an aircraft.
The point about global hawk is, it demonstrates the kind of technology, not that is was an actual global hawk.
I agree it's a problematic notion - any latency in manouvering could be disastrous. The fact that the Boeing seem to be pulling the kind of technology that 'will prevent 911 ever happening again' now, makes it not that far-fetched that it may actually have been kicking about a few years ago. However, in the absence of anything concrete, why leap to conclusions? I'm perfectly frank - I really don't know - I'm open to suggestions - and I won't subscribe to any position I'm not sure of - but whether remote control planes are realistic or not, that simply has no bearing on 'tv trickery' which must stand or fall on its own (lack of) merits.
On the other hand, I think I may have found your culprit 
http://www.guzer.com/videos/rc_boeing747.php
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Long Tooth
Moderate Poster
Joined: 06 Apr 2007
Posts: 306
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 5:54 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | | Dogsmilk wrote: | | far more difficult to actually land a plane that point it at a specific heading. |
Nobody is talkin about landing it, but to hit it head on, I presume, would be very, very difficult to acheive. I just cannot believe that there is the technology to do that. As for using Global hawks, where are the global hawks in the footage of the towers being hit? They sure dont look like Global hawks to me? Come on, using a totally different type of plane was far too risky. Do you not think?
The trick was NOT TO USE PLANES and leave the rest to TV fakery and the witness imagination, a bit like how a novel works. |
you state that ''you do not believe this technology exists'', you seem to be guessing here, and we all know what guessers are dont we? by the way did your ancestors also guess that a nuclear bomb was not being developed prior to the release on thousands of innocent citizens.
you boldly declare ''the trick was not to use planes'' thats fair enough, but perhaps when you have a spare minute from spamming the topics you can post your refrences for your conspiracy theory? rather than a few grainy dodgy videao clips? perhaps you may be taken seriously, as and when you put some thought and effort into your theories?
why introduce the global hawks red herring? it reminds me of some crude street magician hustling kids out of their cents. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
