| View previous topic :: View next topic |
| Author |
Message |
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
 Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:19 pm Post subject: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
 |
|
So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations.
 |
|
| Back to top |
|
 |
chek
Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006
Posts: 3889
Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:32 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations. |
And what do you suggest, you naughty if hopelessly uninformed agent provocatuer you?
_________________
Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:41 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| chek wrote: | | 911 a past gone mad wrote: | So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations. |
And what do you suggest, you naughty if hopelessly uninformed agent provocatuer you? |
Is that not down to you? Steven E Jones is your hero. The 'planes hitting towers' scenario is your baby.
You don't seem too bothered. You are being led down a cul de sac and you don't care. So, what are you going to do about it?
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Me
Moderate Poster
Joined: 16 Jul 2006
Posts: 431
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
If they ever dared to claim that it was the terrorists that actually planted the bombs then one thing is for damn sure. It would finally expose to 'all', skeptics and otherwise what a fraud NIST, Popular Mechanics and other debunkers are when claiming that the demolition theory was either impossible or not even worthy of consideration. In a way I wish that they’d feel desperate enough to make that claim. It’s obvious that only someone with an inside track and control of the internal security measures could’ve allowed for such a monumental task. Something a random “terrorist” wouldn’t have had.
The previous bombing by the way provides no true comparison. There’s a big difference between parking a truck with a bomb outside of a building and actually spending months carefully planning, placing and wiring bombs within a building to create a near perfect collapse.
At least I'm assuming that is what you really meant by this. The 93' bombing.
| Quote: |
Something similar happened in 9/11 |
|
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:50 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| Me wrote: | If they ever dared to claim that it was the terrorists that actually planted the bombs then one thing is for damn sure. It would finally expose to 'all', skeptics and otherwise what a fraud NIST, Popular Mechanics and other debunkers are when claiming that the demolition theory was either impossible or not even worthy of consideration. In a way I wish that they’d feel desperate enough to make that claim. It’s obvious that only someone with an inside track and control of the internal security measures could’ve allowed for such a monumental task. Something a random “terrorist” wouldn’t have had.
The previous bombing by the way provides no true comparison. There’s a big difference between parking a truck with a bomb outside of a building and actually spending months carefully planning, placing and wiring bombs within a building to create a near perfect collapse.
At least I'm assuming that is what you really meant by this. The 93' bombing.
| Quote: |
Something similar happened in 9/11 |
|
They will use this claim, and they PM/NIST team will say that as far as th ey were concerned, on the data available at the time, the Jet fuel scenario was accurate. This is the card they will play. However, the delaying tactics of Steven Elvis Jones will probably release them from such a situation as it will be far too late.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 3:54 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations.
|
If I interpret this correctly, it seems to be suggesting that because there is a conceivable excuse that could be wheeled out to try to cover the Jones hypothesis (after nearly 6 years of rigorous denials of any explosives? that would work? but, I digress), then that hypothesis is therefore wrong.
This implies that the validity of a hypothesis is contingent upon whether or not it is possible to contrive an excuse to account for it rather than whether the actual evidence supports it. So, by extension, we are likely to be more successful backing a theory that does not necessarily fit the available evidence, but rather offers no opportunity for a contrived excuse?
Extraordinary.
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:04 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| Dogsmilk wrote: | | 911 a past gone mad wrote: | So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations.
|
If I interpret this correctly, it seems to be suggesting that because there is a conceivable excuse that could be wheeled out to try to cover the Jones hypothesis (after nearly 6 years of rigorous denials of any explosives? that would work? but, I digress), then that hypothesis is therefore wrong.
This implies that the validity of a hypothesis is contingent upon whether or not it is possible to contrive an excuse to account for it rather than whether the actual evidence supports it. So, by extension, we are likely to be more successful backing a theory that does not necessarily fit the available evidence, but rather offers no opportunity for a contrived excuse?
Extraordinary. |
Steven Jones is tossing it off, taking too long. By the time he gets his * together, the NWO will have been implemented twice over. Never mind yacking about it, what exactly is happening with this evidence?
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
Dogsmilk
Mighty Poster
Joined: 06 Oct 2006
Posts: 1616
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:07 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: | | Dogsmilk wrote: | | 911 a past gone mad wrote: | So,you get your courtcase, you get your new investigation. It is proved that bombs brought down the WTC. Do you really think the perps do not have a 'plan b'? You think your collective Culumbo work has brought down the Neo cons?
Then what, they admit that bombs were placed in the buildings, they admit they had been duped again. Something similar happened in 9/11, The terrorists must have planted the bombs.
Congratulations.
|
If I interpret this correctly, it seems to be suggesting that because there is a conceivable excuse that could be wheeled out to try to cover the Jones hypothesis (after nearly 6 years of rigorous denials of any explosives? that would work? but, I digress), then that hypothesis is therefore wrong.
This implies that the validity of a hypothesis is contingent upon whether or not it is possible to contrive an excuse to account for it rather than whether the actual evidence supports it. So, by extension, we are likely to be more successful backing a theory that does not necessarily fit the available evidence, but rather offers no opportunity for a contrived excuse?
Extraordinary. |
Steven Jones is tossing it off, taking too long. By the time he gets his * together, the NWO will have been implemented twice over. Never mind yacking about it, what exactly is happening with this evidence? |
I wouldn't worry about it - according to your chain of reasoning, actual evidence is irrelevant.
_________________
It's a man's life in MOSSAD |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:10 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Answer me, where is Steven Jone's evidence? When is he going to do something with it? He moves like a snail.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
kbo234
Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Dec 2005
Posts: 2017
Location: Croydon, Surrey
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:10 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| 911 a past gone mad wrote: |
Steven Jones is tossing it off, taking too long. By the time he gets his * together, the NWO will have been implemented twice over. Never mind yacking about it, what exactly is happening with this evidence? |
Stop beating around the bush. What are you suggesting that we should all be trying to do? |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:35 pm Post subject: Re: 9/11 Truth: The Steven Jones Way |
|
|
| kbo234 wrote: | | 911 a past gone mad wrote: |
Steven Jones is tossing it off, taking too long. By the time he gets his * together, the NWO will have been implemented twice over. Never mind yacking about it, what exactly is happening with this evidence? |
Stop beating around the bush. What are you suggesting that we should all be trying to do? |
Are you long are you prepared to wait for this truth to come out? Steven Jones is a black sheep of this movement, just like he was when he waded into the world of 'cold fusion'.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
ian neal
Angel - now passed away
Joined: 26 Jul 2005
Posts: 3140
Location: UK
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Guess what? Discussion of Steven Jones' theories on thermate/thermite also belong in the controversies section.
Why? Because they are amongst the most controversial and divisive of issues within the movement.
Contrary to what you assume, 911apgm, the 911 truth movement doesn't break down in to supporters of Steven Jones vs supporters of no plane theories. |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
911 a past gone mad
Minor Poster
Joined: 13 May 2007
Posts: 39
|
| Posted: Mon May 14, 2007 4:43 pm Post subject: |
|
|
| ian neal wrote: | Guess what? Discussion of Steven Jones' theories on thermate/thermite also belong in the controversies section.
Why? Because they are amongst the most controversial and divisive of issues within the movement.
Contrary to what you assume, 911apgm, the 911 truth movement doesn't break down in to supporters of Steven Jones vs supporters of no plane theories. |
The majority of truthseekers think Steven Elvis Jones is God.
_________________
Steven Elvis Jones leads the way |
|
| Back to top |
|
|
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
