View previous topic :: View next topic |
Author |
Message |
Sherlock Holmes Validated Poster
Joined: 10 Sep 2006 Posts: 205 Location: Sunny Southampton
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 1:31 pm Post subject: Energy beam weapons theory disintegrates? |
|
|
Energy beam weapons theory disintegrates?
Steven Jones has published a new paper:
http://journalof911studies.com/volume/200704/JonesWTC911SciMethod.pdf
I commend this scientific article to you all, it is definately worth reading.
I found pages 21 and 22 of the report (printed in the Journal of 9/11 studies as 74 and 75), especially interesting. The rest of the paper is also very well written and easy to read.
The toasted cars are explained by the massive quantities of potassium permanganate KMn04 present in the pyroclastic cloud which any scientist (chemistry, physicist, biologist definitely but maybe not civil engineers ) can tell you is a extremely potent oxidising agent.
Obviously the NPT isn't explained away by Jone’s paper, and the NPT and TV/video fakery may end up actually being true, at the end of the day. - HOWEVER - it doesn't add to the overall fact that 9/11 was an inside job and can be PROVED to have been an inside job beyond reasonable doubt without delving into the realms of NPT, or Energy beams.
Just to cheer the ‘Energy Beamers’ up, here is an article from RIA Novosti (which I’m sure you all read regularly), which PROVES that energy beam weapons exist and are being used.
From radio telescopes to electromagnetic weapons
http://en.rian.ru/analysis/20070511/65348455.html |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:18 pm Post subject: |
|
|
Looks like an interesting read, Sherlock. (That's not meant to sound sarky btw).
I'll read through it more thoroughly at home later.
I would also add that there is no doubt that DEW weapons exist - but the issue is whether the existence of those with power to demolish 110 storey skyscrapers in under 14 seconds is anything other than conjecture so far. _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
scubadiver Validated Poster
Joined: 26 Apr 2006 Posts: 1850 Location: Currently Andover
|
Posted: Tue May 15, 2007 3:28 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I watched the latest footage of the BBC audio that was disrupted. The reporter said that a lot of survivors caught up in the collapses were taken to hospital with severe burn injuries...
_________________ Currently working on a new website |
|
Back to top |
|
|
rodin Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006 Posts: 2224 Location: UK
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 7:57 pm Post subject: |
|
|
I read the new Jones paper earlier today and my detailed riposte was munched by a bad internet connection.
From memory
1) Jones lays it on thick that he, and not P & F, is the fusion daddy (muon) recounting some research done with a Jewish professor
2) The 'spherules' evidence from WTC dust is interesting if authentic
3) The Thermate blast toasted the cars hypothesis is glib - it avoids explaining why steel was scorched while plastic remained un-melted in close proximity
4) Mormons are pretty close to Zionists - another devious cult. Sorta like freemasons - in the same zone.
To get to the bottom of what really brought down the towers you need to solve the puzzle - Why was Zebuhr murdered?
Jones says his research is driven 'by a higher source'
Yeah... _________________ Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
Back to top |
|
|
chek Mega Poster
Joined: 12 Sep 2006 Posts: 3889 Location: North Down, N. Ireland
|
Posted: Thu May 17, 2007 8:41 pm Post subject: |
|
|
rodin wrote: | I read the new Jones paper earlier today and my detailed riposte was munched by a bad internet connection.
From memory
1) Jones lays it on thick that he, and not P & F, is the fusion daddy (muon) recounting some research done with a Jewish professor |
As I understand it, it's the reproducibility of results that is the main stumbling block. It's not a field I'm that familiar with, but despite the meme that Jones 'scuppered' the P&F research, if there was merit in their approach then other teams would be reproducing it and they aren't.
Apparently P&F's approach has yielded a more efficient electrolytic process of hydrogen separation, but not true fusion.
Whereas Jones muon approach can (he says) be repeated.
rodin wrote: | 2) The 'spherules' evidence from WTC dust is interesting if authentic |
The molten iron is the high temperature smoking gun. No element of the OCT can account for that.
rodin wrote: | 3) The Thermate blast toasted the cars hypothesis is glib - it avoids explaining why steel was scorched while plastic remained un-melted in close proximity |
I understand from one read through that the point is that the cars were not scorched but corroded. We tend to associate oxidation with fire, but given the right caustic chemical soup as might have existed in the dust clouds it may have occurred at a lower temperature. I'm not sure how that also applies to rubber tyres, but I'm no chemist. Without physical evidence from an affected vehicle I'm uncertain this phenomena can ever be explained satifactorily.
rodin wrote: | 4) Mormons are pretty close to Zionists - another devious cult. Sorta like freemasons - in the same zone.
To get to the bottom of what really brought down the towers you need to solve the puzzle - Why was Zebuhr murdered?
Jones says his research is driven 'by a higher source'
Yeah... |
I'm wondering if there is anything beyond the random and therefore conspiratorially suspicious to the murder of Zebuhr that's somehow connected to the glowing aluminium research allegedly underway at the time. Or was there more too it than that?
Other people's spiritual beliefs can be mysterious. I'm suspicious of any religion that comes knocking at your door when you just get sitting down... _________________ Dissolution of the Global Corporations.
It's the only way.
It's them or us. |
|
Back to top |
|
|
|