Bush election scam revealed

[insidejob]

Bush election victory does not add up, says independent analysis

The current US President could only have won the November 2004 US election if millions of white ghosts voted for him, according to a new analysis published on the internet.

Voting rights author, Michael Collins, has published on a New Zealand alternative news website facts and analyses that support claims that the Bush victory was a fraud.

In his analysis, published on Scoop News, ‘Urban Legend, Election 2004 vs white ghosts of NYC’, he writes:

“White ghosts never seen before emerged from parking lots, alleys and perhaps even graveyards in big cities across the country to give George W. Bush a stunning victory in the presidential election of 2004. It had to be this way, otherwise the vote count was wrong and who would tolerate such a notion, despite the clear signs on the ground and in the National Exit Poll?”

Collins’ analysis is based on opinion polls, particularly the usually reliable National Exit Poll (NEP) that questions people immediately after they have voted. He also used voting records and the work of web commentators.

His analysis tackles the 2004 election puzzle: why were the opinion polls giving the victory to Democrat, John Kerry, when George W Bush emerged as the clear winner?

He criticises the media explanations of the Bush victory where commentators said there was a swing from liberal and minority urban voters to conservative, white rural voters. Collins said this happened in 2000 but in not 2004.

He says a different picture emerges if voters are divided into rural, towns, suburbs and big cities. It also produces a number of key issues that casts doubt on the Bush victory.

He says the only way polls and recorded votes can be reconciled is if Bush won due to a big turnout for him in big cities that usually vote Democrat.

He notes that the Republican campaign targetted rural votes and in the cities little work was done outside the suburbs. Yet, he lost votes in rural areas.

He says: “Bush lost a huge portion of his core constituency, rural America, which dropped from 23% to 16% of the overall vote total; yet he won the election.

“Bush won a huge increase in urban America, a place where Bush didn’t advertise significantly, where the GOTV (Get the Vote Out) effort was unnoticeable compared to Kerry’s, and where he was clearly an unpopular president; yet he won the election.”

He points out that analysis of the actual, recorded voting in big cities does not tally with the voting revised opinion polls says happened.

He says: “The NEP reports a 66% increase in voter turnout in the big cities, from 9 million votes in 2000 to 15 million in 2006. Now here’s the shocker…the 66% vote increase simply can’t be true on the basis of actual reports of big city vote totals.”

He explains pollster as distorting their own initial results in order to fit in with the official result of the Presidential race.

He says: “Where then did the Bush swing in the urban wave come from? The simple answer is that it was weighted into existence. The act of reconciling the exit polls to the official vote count created it. The Bush urban voters came into existence because they had to… otherwise the official vote count would be wrong.”

Despite the unquestioning acceptance of the result by mainstream media by August, 2006 more than half of Americans had expressed doubts that the 2004 results were fair according to a Zogby Poll of 1018 registered voters nationwide.



Michael Collins is a writer who focuses on clean elections and voting rights. He is the publisher of the voting rights web site, www.ElectionFraudNews.com. His recent articles include: Coalition Paper Ballot Call Spares Vote Villains; Paper for President. The Time is NOW; A Formula for Catching Election Fraud; and Teardown: The Mainstream Media Turns on Bush. A complete list of articles is available here http://electionfraudnews.com/MichaelCollins.htm .

‘Urban Legend, Election 2004 vs white ghosts of NYC’, http://www.scoop.co.nz/stories/HL0706/S00165.htm

As New Zealand's largest online news resource, the site attracts a high-value professional audience, but also a discerning general readership seeking an alternative to other major news media.

end

[Cruise4]

Electronic Voting Machines of course use Digital data. This is never ever safe. I know of no digital based anything that cannot be compromised. Its an inherent weakness in the actual medium. This is why Digital Rights Management, Vista Activation... you name it can ALWAYS be cracked. Its just a matter of time and processing power. And a COMPLETE waste of money and time.

The Scottish people are hopping mad about their elections earlier this year. The machines used were Diebold Election Systems, if my memory serves me right. Non of these machines are safe. They attach printers to them and still they are unsafe. They can be remotely hacked and have probably been designed to be used for election fraud. I know someone who worked on Government software and he told me about 'backdoor' screening, meaning if a Government officials ID number comes up... no flag. If yours and mine comes up... big flag.

There's only one way to run elections. Anyone can stand and its a one man one vote manual counted tracked tally. That way the audit trail of an election physically exists.

I'm not just having a go at Diebold... its all of them. Anyone that says they want to use these systems has the intention of election fraud. Its that simple.

I'm sure all this is probably covered elsewhere but here's a audio link for a good expose of all this:

http://www.freedomforceinternational.org/audio/Karp_vote_fraud.mp3

[karlos]

[rodin]

[TonyGosling]

not news - moved to 'the bigger picture'