Time to bring the 911 perps to book is overdue

[rodin]

Were there due process, I could singlehandedly charge Bush, Blair and hence the tribe behind them with criminal 911 involvement based on one item of physical evidence - that a collapsing building cannot do so at free-fall speed.

Can anyone actually help here? How come we CANNOT use this irrefutible evidence to prove our case and start rooting out the culprits?

Is there no method of redress?

to continue

We have authenticated video evidence of this crime. Proving that the twin towers collapse was free-fall requires a little careful study and measurement, but it can be done. Plus the NIST report agrees, though since the NIST report is faked their figures should perhaps not be taken at face value. You need a slightly more intelligent jury to follow the towers arguments.

But in the case of WTC7, the free-fall collapse is abundantly clear. The edges of the collapsing building are not obscured by clouds of dust and smoke. Analysis of the classic WTC7 footage by any independent and not-nobbled scientific panel (lecturers, postgrad students etc) could only lead to one conclusion - controlled demolition.

I ask again - is there any course of redress whereby this evidence of the inside job can be used to prosecute a case against our establishment?

PS

It would IMO be worth contacting all engineers at all universities to get them to study the WTC7 video and present their conclusions.