Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Fri Nov 07, 2008 10:28 am Post subject:
Could this be how they operate? Certainly an interesting and plausible theory. This seems to be the MO, drown the cabinet's will to fight back with fear of debt and press exposure.
Quote:
It is interesting that a significant amount of bribe money is paid in the form of election expenses (a method used by Lyndon Johnson). It all started with the £7 million raised by Lord Levy for Blair's election as leader in 1994. This year Gordon Brown received a large sum of money for his non election campaign. The deputy leader campaign is an interesting one. David Abrahams gave £5,000 to Hilary Benn. He was beaten by Harriet Harman to the post. Harman was elected on 24th June. On 5th July she received 5,000 from Abrahams via Janet Kidd to help with her election expenses. People like Abrahams give money to those in power. In this case he originally backed someone who failed to win so he then gives money to the woman who did win. This seems like a bribe to me. What is more, Harman is married to Jack Dromey, the Labour Party Treasurer. The man who claims he did not know Abrahams or anything about the loans to the Labour Party that were given for honours.
I believe Harriet Harman was turned along with Patricia Hewitt by MI5 when they both worked for the NCCL (see the Cathy Massiter case in in 1984). Harman's rash behaviour made her an easy person to turn. For example, she persuaded her sister Sarah, a lawyer and part-time judge, to pass her confidential papers when she was Solicitor General. Harriet Harman got away with it but her sister was found guilty of contempt of court and "conduct unbefitting a solicitor" and was ordered to pay £25,000 costs.
I believe it is possible that Harriet Harman is being blackmailed. Despite their very high joint-incomes the Harman's are heavily in debt and took out a £40,000 loan that was not declared at the time she was involved in the deputy leader election.
Posted: Wed Jan 21, 2009 8:56 pm Post subject: No Fear
This is the thing, it relies on an individual's fear of it exposing something shameful, thereby causing their supposed value to go down. However, I have found that if one is not afraid then one cannot be blackmailed. In the end, money isn't everything. You can be a drone and go along with whatever it wants but you'll be worse off than if you stood up for yourself at the beginning. My family are nobles and of an ancient family of a country in Europe. Over the last hundred years we've lost almost all our material wealth. I should be a very wealthy person right now, but I'm not because of land seizures and outright theft by my family's country which took place just after the turn of the century and throughout the 20th century. When I see paintings and photos of my family before all this happened, I feel rather sad. But I have my own family now. My children are forthright and honourable and are certainly not weasels like some of our counterparts. I've brought them up to not be afraid of anyone, but also not to inflict hurt on others. This is a good thing, and something that is very powerful.
Thanks. Listening now.
Its a bit hit and miss on quality and I just googled this guy across site and the version there may be slightly better quality....
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sun Mar 22, 2009 9:01 pm Post subject:
Illuminati News Story Today?
Ken Clarke - MAJOR Bilderberger - the number 1 Bilderberger in Britain - ticking boxes 3 and 5 on the list this week!
He has atacked other Tories who are calling for an end to inheritance tax on estates under £1m. A few days ago he was in trouble again for calling tax breaks for married couples 'social engineering'. Well, he should know all about social engineering eh!?
1. Abolition of Monarchy and all ordered Government.
2. Abolition of private property.
3. Abolition of inheritance.
4. Abolition of patriotism.
5. Abolition of the family (i.e., of marriage and all morality, and the institution of the communal education of children).
6. Abolition of all religion.
When we left off, we were exploring the proposition that the New World Order is the British Empire repackaged, and this empire was literally a marriage of effete British aristocracy and virile (or virulent) Jewish finance.
Webster Tarpley is a gifted historian who generally eschews mention of Jewish bankers in favor of euphemisms like "Venetians." Therefore it is unusual for him to state bluntly that King Edward VII was in the pay of the Rothschilds and was responsible for World War One.
Edward VII didn't become king until 1901 when he was 60 years old. As Prince of Wales, he was estranged from his mother, kept on an allowance and deeply in debt. He allowed a "series of Jewish bankers to manage his personal finances." These included Baron von Hirsch and Sir Ernest Cassell. "Edward also cultivated the Rothschild and Sassoon families. In short, Edward's personal household finance agency was identical with the leading lights of turn-of-the-century Zionism."
(King Edward VII: Evil Demiurge of the Triple Entente & WW1.)
Tarpley is equally forthright in stating that "Edward VII, far more than any other single human being, was the author of the First World War...the most destructive single event in the history of Western civilization" which opened the door to Communism, Fascism, the Great Depression and World War Two. Tarpley falls into the trap of establishment historians by attributing great events to single personalities. These personalities are invariably puppets of the people who pay their bills.
Tarpley goes into some detail about how King Edward and his Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey, the son of Edward's horse master, engineered World War One. Essentially, they deceived Germany into believing that England would remain neutral. To prevent the war, all they had to do was clarify this point. Germany would have backed down and reined in Austria.
In August 1914, Kaiser Wilhelm realized he had been fooled: "England, Russia and France have agreed among themselves ... to take the Austro-Serbian conflict as an excuse for waging a war of extermination against us...That is the real naked situation slowly & cleverly set going by Edward VII...The net has been suddenly thrown over our heads, and England sneeringly reaps the most brilliant success of her persistently prosecuted anti-German world policy against which we have proved ourselves helpless, while she twists the noose of our political and economic destruction out of our fidelity to Austria, as we squirm isolated in the net."
BACKGROUND
"England's" animosity against Germany was part of an agenda to use a catastrophic war to undermine Western civilization, and advance the Judeo-Masonic New World Order. Three empires disappeared in that inferno while Communism and Zionism rose like the phoenix.
The decadent British aristocracy is totally complicit in the cabalistic bankers' plan to degrade and enslave mankind. Who are these "aristocrats?" In an essay, "Breeding Concubines," Greg Hallett makes some astonishing, some might say ridiculous, claims. I present them here without judgment, to be proven or discredited as evidence emerges.
Edward VII was the mentally deficient product of the marriage between Queen Victoria and her first cousin Albert. He was the oldest male of her nine children. He married in 1863 and had five legitimate children between 1864 and 1869. His eldest son, Clarence, was mentally deranged and the prime suspect in the Jack the Ripper murders.
Edward VII routinely and openly cheated on his wife. He had dozens of mistresses, some as young as age 14. One of these was the Jewish-born Lady Randolph Jennie Jerome Churchill. Hallett believes Edward VII was Winston Churchill's real father.
Hallett claims that Queen Victoria had children with Lionel de Rothschild and that two of Edward's sisters, Helena and Beatrice, were Rothschilds. He claims the British Royal family is "a biological, financial and moral subset of the Rothschild international bankers."
"Interbreeding amongst the British royal family over generations has created concubines, illegitimate children and agents of war. The British Royal family are then shamed by these events and then manipulated into any activity their owners require...This gave [the Rothschilds] consummate power over the British Royal family, and any others they interbred with, which was all the royal families of Europe..." ("Breeding Concubines" in "Stalin's British Training," 2007, pp. 1-38.)
CONCLUSION
These claims seem far fetched yet it is plain to see that something is wrong with the Royals. It is widely acknowledged that Edward VII was dissolute. If Hallet's claim that "the British Royal family are a subset of the Rothschild family and are utilized as part of the Rothschild business as a money-making venture to create war," it would explain King Edward VII's role in starting World War One.
The reports of homosexuality, drugs, pederasty, promiscuity, occultism in the history of the British aristocracy are consistent with what we know about the Illuminati. They are depraved yet somehow able to subvert mankind without serious resistance.
What a tawdry tale is modern history! Instead of grasping greatness within reach, the human race is paralyzed by the morbid spell of a Satanic cult, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers.
Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Buckinghamshire
Posted: Fri Jun 12, 2009 4:09 pm Post subject:
item 7 submitted the above without comment. Lest visitors to this site take such submissions as general acceptance by contributors...
Quote:
King Edward and his Foreign Secretary Sir Edward Grey, the son of Edward's horse master, engineered World War One. Essentially, they deceived Germany into believing that England would remain neutral. To prevent the war, all they had to do was clarify this point. Germany would have backed down and reined in Austria.
This assertion is made without supportive documentary evidence, and while some logic can be found to support the theory that Britain could have prevented WWI,...
Quote:
British Dithering
It is also suggested that Germany would have backed away from war had Britain declared her intentions sooner. Believing that Britain would stay out of the coming conflict, and would limit herself to diplomatic protests - after all, Britain was under no strict military obligation to France - Germany, and Austria-Hungary, proceeded under the belief that war would be fought solely with France and Russia.
The British Government, and its Foreign Minister, Sir Edward Grey, attempted to mediate throughout July, reserving at all times its right to remain aloof from the dispute. It was only as the war began that the British position solidified into support for, ostensibly, Belgium.
Hence the oft-levelled criticism that had Britain come out clearly on the side of Belgium and France earlier in July, war would have been avoided: Germany would have effectively instructed Austria-Hungary to settle with Serbia, especially given the latter's willingness to co-operate with Austria-Hungary.
Whether this would have transpired given the German war machine's determination for war is of course unknown.
**Recommended viewing for those wishing to have a broader understanding of the causes of WWI**
http://www.firstworldwar.com/origins/causes.htm
... going from this theory to that of, Britain "engineered World War One" doesn't bear close scrutiny. My opinion, for what it's worth, is that Britain was merely playing its options until conflict commenced (If France & Russia alone could defeat Germany, why become embroiled in the conflict). However should the possibility of Germany, with it's challenge to Britain's naval supremacy, be able to annex Belgium, Holland and subjugate France, this would be seen as intolerable. Another point to consider is that from Britain's perspective at the time (which proved far from the truth), once Britain had joined the conflict, it was only to be a matter of months to bring Germany to it's knees.
Quote:
The reports of homosexuality, drugs, pederasty, promiscuity, occultism in the history of the British aristocracy are consistent with what we know about the Illuminati.
Do we? Those frailties (should they all be perceived so) are not the exclusive domain British aristocracy. Such traits are not consistent with what "I" know about the Illuminati. Without clarification, those without particular insight must regard such statements as the author's pre-conception.
Quote:
Instead of grasping greatness within reach, the human race is paralyzed by the morbid spell of a Satanic cult, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers.
Er, what planet is this guy from, it may be comforting for some to use prescribed spectres of good and evil, for the rest of us, human morality is a responsibility of our own conscience.
I have no doubt that the financial elite have always striven to manipulate events with self-interest taking precedence over morality. We do need to recognise the insidious nature of such influences and the injustices that are done in this regard. This has nothing to do with homosexuality, drugs or Satanism, what it has to do with is power and greed in both personal and corporate guises.
The reports of homosexuality, drugs, pederasty, promiscuity, occultism in the history of the British aristocracy are consistent with what we know about the Illuminati. They are depraved yet somehow able to subvert mankind without serious resistance.
What a tawdry tale is modern history! Instead of grasping greatness within reach, the human race is paralyzed by the morbid spell of a Satanic cult, the Cabalist (Illuminati) bankers.
Au contraire mon ami
The banking system can be shown to be a control mechanism for removing wealth and power and in many cases life from the people and delivering to a tiny power group.
'The Money Masters' video and many fine works such as The Secrets of the Federal Reserve and The Creature from Jekyll Island prove this beyond any doubt, as does the observable reality of how the world is evolving. Apparent trickle-down benefits to mankind in general (material goods, longer life-spans, so called 'freedoms') mask an undertow of demoralisation.
As for connections with the occult and WW1
Quote:
Crowley was a lifelong agent for British Intelligence. .... As an agent provocateur he played some role in provoking the sinking of the RMS Lusitania, thereby bringing the United States closer to active involvement in the war alongside the Allies.[31]
If France & Russia alone could defeat Germany, why become embroiled in the conflict
So the USA could not defeat mighty Iraq alone? The banksters, who own western governments, constantly engineer wars then fund all sides making vast profits. They farm humanity and slaughter is part of the process. As Dennis Kucinich asks - "Who are these people?" _________________ Tooth Fairy denier
Santa Clause Denier
Man-made Climate Change Denier
Joined: 04 Dec 2007 Posts: 226 Location: Buckinghamshire
Posted: Sat Jun 13, 2009 7:12 pm Post subject:
Quote:
So the USA could not defeat mighty Iraq alone?
Item7's response to my opinion on WWI, if there is a correlation here, I fail to see it. Arguments presented are freely open to challenge, however in the interests of debate perhaps Item7 can present a coherent counter argument pertinent to the topic in question.
On your statement, where the interests of corporate America can best be served by actions other than direct intervention it strives to do so covertly. The Cambodia's holocaust, Pinochet's suppression of human rights and death camps being two of many examples.
Quote:
The banksters, who own western governments, constantly engineer wars then fund all sides making vast profits. They farm humanity and slaughter is part of the process. As Dennis Kucinich asks - "Who are these people?"
Whatever, simplistic generalisations add nothing to the understanding of events, Dennis Kucinich comments are well taken in regard to the current situation but unconnected to the topic under discussion.
At 8.05 we get the full blast...? This 3rd part of the interview is also revealing in terms of ego, imo. _________________ "We will lead every revolution against us!" - attrib: Theodor Herzl
"Timely Demise to All Oppressors - at their Convenience!" - 'Interesting Times', Terry Pratchett
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Jan 12, 2010 1:19 am Post subject:
Avatar the film is a conspiracy?
Barmy Aristos?
All religion is the same thing?
We must have balance between good and evil?
Jesus was a high priest of Osiris!
Disaster in December 2012
World Peace by 2019
1 million angelic & demonic UFOs surrounding this planet
There is a Commander approaching
False Flag Alien Invasion
Quite captivating video Thermate
He's well shifty thought
Brzezinski Decries “Global Political Awakening” During CFR Speech
Trilateral Commission co-founder says infighting amongst elite, combined with awakening of humanity worldwide, is hampering move towards one world government
Brzezinski Decries Global Political Awakening During CFR Speech 190510top2
Paul Joseph Watson, Prison Planet.com, Wednesday, May 19, 2010
At a recent Council on Foreign Relations speech in Montreal, co-founder with David Rockefeller of the Trilateral Commission and regular Bilderberg attendee Zbigniew Brzezinski warned that a “global political awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government.
Brzezinski explained that global political leadership had become “much more diversified unlike what it was until relatively recently,” noting the rise of China as a geopolitical power, and that global leadership in the context of the G20 was “lacking internal unity with many of its members in bilateral antagonisms.”
In other words, the global elite is infighting amongst itself and this is hampering efforts to rescue the agenda for global government, which seems to be failing on almost every front.
Brzezinski then explained another significant factor in that, “For the first time in all of human history mankind is politically awakened – that’s a total new reality – it has not been so for most of human history.”
Brzezinski continued, “The whole world has become politically awakened,” adding that all over the world people were aware of what was happening politically and were “consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.”
“Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring,” said Brzezinski, adding that this in combination with a fractured elite “makes it a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently the leading world power, the United States.”
During a subsequent question and answer session, Brzezinski was asked if he thought another organization should replace the United Nations as the de facto “one world government,” to which Brzezinski responded, “There should be such an organization,” before pointing out that the UN was not it in its current role.
As the text at the end of the video makes clear, Brzezinski’s admission that humanity has undergone a political awakening is not a positive development in the eyes of the elite.
In his 1970 book Between Two Ages: America’s Role in the Technetronic Era, Brzezinski wrote the following.
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
The “elite” to which Brzezinski refers included many of those who were in attendance for his speech at the CFR meeting. The global political awakening which Brzezinski discussed represents part of the resistance to that very elite dominated society and the systems of control, subjugation and surveillance that they have imposed upon the human race in pursuit of a “more controlled society” and a one world government.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 1959 Location: South London
Posted: Thu May 20, 2010 8:59 am Post subject:
item8 wrote:
Trilateral Commission co-founder says infighting amongst elite, combined with awakening of humanity worldwide, is hampering move towards one world government....
At a recent Council on Foreign Relations speech in Montreal, co-founder with David Rockefeller of the Trilateral Commission and regular Bilderberg attendee Zbigniew Brzezinski warned that a “global political awakening,” in combination with infighting amongst the elite, was threatening to derail the move towards a one world government.
Brzezinski explained that global political leadership had become “much more diversified unlike what it was until relatively recently,” noting the rise of China as a geopolitical power, and that global leadership in the context of the G20 was “lacking internal unity with many of its members in bilateral antagonisms.”
In other words, the global elite is infighting amongst itself and this is hampering efforts to rescue the agenda for global government, which seems to be failing on almost every front.
Brzezinski then explained another significant factor in that, “For the first time in all of human history mankind is politically awakened – that’s a total new reality – it has not been so for most of human history.” .......
Brzezinski continued, “The whole world has become politically awakened,” adding that all over the world people were aware of what was happening politically and were “consciously aware of global inequities, inequalities, lack of respect, exploitation.”
“Mankind is now politically awakened and stirring,” said Brzezinski, adding that this in combination with a fractured elite “makes it a much more difficult context for any major power, including currently the leading world power, the United States.”
“The technetronic era involves the gradual appearance of a more controlled society. Such a society would be dominated by an elite, unrestrained by traditional values. Soon it will be possible to assert almost continuous surveillance over every citizen and maintain up-to-date complete files containing even the most personal information about the citizen. These files will be subject to instantaneous retrieval by the authorities.”
The “elite” to which Brzezinski refers included many of those who were in attendance for his speech at the CFR meeting. The global political awakening which Brzezinski discussed represents part of the resistance to that very elite dominated society and the systems of control, subjugation and surveillance that they have imposed upon the human race in pursuit of a “more controlled society” and a one world government.
[/quote]
This looks like good news from Brzezinski, though he sees it as bad news.
Governance at each level (from local to global) answerable to the awakening people is what is needed, not the current situation of global governance by hidden wealthy and morally bankrupt elite.
So thieves are falling out with each other: hooray!
III. The adept is supposed to possess qualities requisite for a General in consequence of those he may have evinced before he was called to the Supreme Council. As he is to preside over the whole Order, he must (more than any body else) be impressed with the principles of the founder, and be divested of all religious, political, or national prejudices. The grand object of the Order must be more particularly inculcated into him, namely, that of teaching the whole universe to set aside all government, laws, and altars; and he must perpetually attend to the grand interests of human nature. His zeal is to be stimulated at the sight of every man who is subjected to any authority. It is to reinstate the inhabitants of the earth in their original Equality and Liberty that he is constituted General of all the Illuminees that are or will be spread over the world during his reign, all labouring at the accomplishment of the grand revolution of the Man-King.
Preliminary Observations
Chapter I. Spartacus-Weishaupt, Founder of the Illuminees
Chapter II. Code of the Illuminees
Chapter III. Of the Brother Insinuator, or the Recruiter
Chapter IV. First Preparatory Degree: Novice
Chapter V. Second Preparatory Degree: The Brethren of Minerva
Chapter VI. Third Preparatory Degree: The Minor Illuminee
Chapter VII. Fourth Preparatory Degree: The Major Illuminee, or the Scotch Novice
Chapter VIII. Intermediate Class: The Scotch Knight
Chapter IX. The Lesser Mysteries; The Epopt or Priest of Illuminism
Chapter X. Continuation of the Discourse on the Lesser Mysteries
Chapter XI. The Regent, or the Prince Illuminee
Chapter XII. Class of Grand Mysteries; the Mage or the Philosopher, and the Man King
Chapter XIII. Government of the Order
Chapter XIV. Of the Government and Political Instructions for the Epopts
Chapter XV. Instructions for the Regent or Prince Illuminee, on the Government of the Order
Chapter XVI. Continuation of the Instructions on the Government of the Illuminees
Chapter XVII. Instructions for the Provincial
Chapter XVIII. Of the National Directors, of the Areopagites, and of the General of Illuminism
Posted: Mon Sep 20, 2010 6:18 pm Post subject: Adam Weishaupt
Adam Weishaupt was the son of a Jewish Rabbi. He became a Jesuit priest. Reading in his godfather's library convinced him that he was an Atheist. He left the priesthhood to study at the Bavarian Institute of Ingolstadt. He graduated in Law and then afterwards he served as a lecturer in law for four years.
In 1771 Weishaupt met Charles de Lorraine, the grand master of the Priory of Sion. He became apprenticed to Lorraine for five years. Weishaupt rose rapidly in his academic career, becoming Professor of Civil Law in 1772. Professor of Canon Law in 1773 and Dean of the Faculty of Law in 1775
While teaching Law he studied pagan religions, Manicheaism, Eleusian Mysteries, Pythogras, the Essenes the Kabbalah, and the Major and Lesser key of Solomon. He learned how to perform occult rituals and how to conjure spirits and demons.
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Sat Dec 18, 2010 11:02 pm Post subject:
Tory MP calls for local government planning to be replaced by 'chaos' http://www.guardian.co.uk/politics/2010/dec/18/coalition-local-plannin g-boles-chaos
Key ally of David Cameron embarrasses coalition with statement that central planning of services is ineffective
Toby Helm & Richard Rogers - guardian.co.uk, Saturday 18 December 2010
A key member of David Cameron's inner circle was at the centre of controversy tonight after he was filmed stating that the prime minister and his deputy, Nick Clegg, want their "people power" revolution to unleash "chaotic" effects across local communities. The comments, by Nicholas Boles, Tory MP for Grantham and Stamford, were made 10 days ago during a debate in Westminster hosted by the polling organisation Ipsos MORI. During a question-and-answer session on the "big society", Boles – viewed by Cameron's circle as an "outrider" for imaginative thinking on policy – was asked why he seemed to prefer "chaos" to central planning of services.
Boles replied that he, Cameron and Clegg did not believe in central planning and that it would be a good thing to have different communities offering differing types of services, even if the appearance was chaotic.
"I mean, bluntly, there comes a question in life," he told the audience. "Do you believe planning works? That clever people sitting in a room can plan how people's communities should develop, or do you believe it can't work? I believe it can't work, David Cameron believes it can't, Nick Clegg believes it can't. Chaotic therefore in our vocabulary is a good thing.
Posted: Thu Aug 25, 2011 3:19 pm Post subject: Interview with Illuminati Defector
Came across this highly interesting radio interview with Illuminati defector svali.
Well worth a listen.
http://www.bibliotecapleyades.net/sociopolitica/sociopol_illuminatirev elations04.htm _________________ "The likelihood of one individual being right increases in direct proportion to the intensity to which others are trying to prove him[her] wrong."
- - Harry Segall
"The best way to control the opposition is to lead it ourselves." Lenin 1917
Joined: 25 Jul 2005 Posts: 18335 Location: St. Pauls, Bristol, England
Posted: Tue Nov 08, 2011 11:10 pm Post subject:
Were six deaths attributed to the 'Curse of Tutankhamun' actually murders by arch-satanist Aleister Crowley?
By Daily Mail Reporter - 8th November 2011
http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2059084/Six-deaths-attributed- Curse-Tutankhamun-murders-committed-notorious-satanist-book-claims.htm l
Six mysterious deaths famously attributed to the 'Curse of Tutankhamun' were actually murders by a notorious satanist, a new book claims.
Throughout the 1920s and 1930s, London was gripped by the mythical curse of the Egyptian boy-king, whose tomb was uncovered by British archaeologist Howard Carter.
More than 20 people linked to the opening of the pharaoh's burial chamber in Luxor in 1923 bizarrely died over the following years - six of them in the capital.
But the new book claims satanist Aleister Crowley was responsible for six of them - and encouraged a seventh murder.
The book, researched by historian Mark Benyon, also draws parallels between Crowley and Jack the Ripper.
Victims included Carter's personal secretary Captain Richard Bethell, who was found dead in his bed after being smothered at an exclusive Mayfair club.
Bethell's father Lord Westbury then plunged seven floors to his death from his St James's apartment. He reportedly kept tomb artifacts gifted by his son.
Aubrey Herbert, half-brother of Carter's financial backer Lord Carnarvon, also died suspiciously in a Park Lane hospital shortly after visiting Luxor.
At the time, the press blamed the 'Curse of Tutankhamun' for the deaths and speculated on the supernatural powers of the ancient Egyptians.
But Mr Beynon has now drawn on previously unpublished evidence to conclude they were actually all ritualistic killings masterminded by Crowley, an occultist dubbed 'the wickedest man in the world'.
After unique analysis of Crowley's diaries, essays and books and inquest reports, he argues that he was a Jack the Ripper-obsessed copycat killer.
Crowley, who called himself 'The Great Beast', apparently had his own motives to tarnish the legacy of Carter's legendary discovery.
The gods and goddesses of Crowley's own religious philosophy, Thelema, were mainly drawn from ancient Egyptian religion.
He believed himself to be a prophet of a new age of personal liberty, controlled by the ancient Egyptian god Horus.
It is likely that he would have found Carter's excavation sacrilegious and wanted revenge, according to Mr Beynon.
In his new book 'London's Curse: Murder, Black Magic and Tutankhamun in the 1920s West End', published this week, Mr Benyon pins seven deaths on Crowley - and six of them took place in London.
He accuses Crowley of being responsible for the deaths of:-
Raoul Loveday who died on February 16, 1923. The 23-year-old Oxford undergraduate was a follower of Crowley's cult at a Sicilian Abbey. He died on the same day at the very hour of Carter's much-publicised opening of Tutankhamun's burial chamber after drinking the blood of a cat sacrificed in one of Crowley's rituals. Mr Beynon argues that he was deliberately poisoned.
Prince Ali Kamel Fahmy Bey who died on July 10, 1923. The Egyptian prince, 23, was shot dead by his French wife of six months, Marie-Marguerite, in London's Savoy Hotel shortly after he was photographed visiting the tomb. Mr Beynon says that Crowley and Marie-Marguerite had been lovers in Paris. She was working as a hostess at the Folies Berghre and he was a regular patron at the same venue. He suggests that Crowley put her up to the shooting.
Aubrey Herbert, died September, 23, 1923. Shortly after Marie-Marguerite's acquittal, Aubrey Herbert, the half-brother of Lord Carnarvon, died of blood poisoning after a routine dental operation went suspiciously wrong at his private hospital in Park Lane. He had only recently returned from his own trip to Luxor. Mr Beynon speculates that Crowley was behind the death and may again have used Marie-Marguerite to do his dirty work.
Captain Richard Bethell, died November 15, 1929. Howard Carter's 46-year-old personal secretary was found dead in his bed at Mayfair's exclusive Bath Club. Bethell was said to have been in perfect health. It was initially thought that he died of a heart attack but his symptoms raised suspicion that he was smothered to death as he slept. Crowley had only recently returned to London and was often a guest of novelist W. Somerset Maugham at the club.
Lord Westbury, died February 20, 1930. Bethell's father, Lord Westbury, 77, was believed to have thrown himself off his seventh floor St James's apartment. But Mr Beynon found that it was practically impossible for an elderly man to have climbed out onto the window ledge and suggests that Crowley threw him off.
Edgar Steele, died February 24, 1930. Only four days after the death of Lord Westbury, Mr Steele, 57, died at St Thomas' Hospital after a minor stomach operation. Mr Beynon speculates that Crowley was behind the death. He was in charge of handling the tomb artefacts at London's British Museum.
Sir Ernest Wallis Budge, died November 23, 1934. A former Keeper in the British Museum's Department of Egyptian and Assyrian Antiquities, he was found dead in his bed in Bloomsbury aged 77. A friend of Lord Carnarvon, he had been responsible for displaying the artefacts from Luxor. Mr Beynon says there is evidence that Budge and Crowley were associates on the London occult scene.
Crowley, who was born into a wealthy upper class family in 1875, had a controversial doctrine for life of 'Do What Thou Wilt'.
The bisexual heroin addict gained notoriety for advocating sexual promiscuity and prostitution and was dubbed 'the wickedest man in the world' in the press.
Mr Beynon paints a picture of a dangerous schizophrenic known to have murdered his servants in India.
Crowley never mentions the deaths in his diaries but often wrote that his mood had 'lifted' the day after them.
He was obsessed with Jack the Ripper, writing numerous essays and poems about him.
He socialised with Ripper suspect Walter Sickert and Mr Beynon argues that Crowley used the Ripper's killing spree as inspiration for his own efforts years later.
Crowley wrote in his diaries that he believed the locations of five of the Ripper's murders in Whitechapel in 1888 formed a pentagram - an important star-shaped symbol in Satanism.
Mr Beynon claims that the locations of five of Crowley's 'murders' form a copycat pentagram.
Crowley believed that the Ripper's murders had afforded him special powers, including invisibility.
Mr Beynon says that he thought his murders would also render him invisible.
To test his theory, he famously walked through London's Cafi Royal restaurant ridiculously dressed in a mustard-coloured cloak adorned with occultist symbols.
When customers fell silent and were too perturbed to speak to him, he assumed they could not see him.
Outlining his macabre theory, Mr Beynon said: 'When I researched these deaths, Crowley's name popped up again and again.
'There is plenty of circumstantial evidence linking him to all the deaths and his diaries and books are riddled with clues linking him to these crimes.
'I have just put all the pieces of the jigsaw together.
'So much of Crowley's belief system was steeped in ancient Egypt.
'He would have seen the opening of Tutankhamun's tomb as desecration.
'This was a man given to extensive world travel and yet we know he was in London when at least four of the six deaths occurred.' He added: 'I hope the book will appeal to anyone with an interest in crime or London history.
'I was fascinated researching London in the 20s and 30s.
On the surface, it was very glitzy and glamorous but there was a dark underbelly that provided the ideal stage for this story.
'Everyone was obsessed with the supposed Curse of Tutankhamun striking down high society victims.
'But until now, no-one has ever realised that they may well have been murdered.'
Were six deaths attributed to the 'Curse of Tutankhamun' actually murders by arch-satanist Aleister Crowley?
There’s that chap Chris White? And he's made a few videos exposing the lies of Jordan Maxwell and so on. He’s has set a reward/ challenge for anyone who can give any true evidence of what most claim for evidence of Egyptian texts and so on that say this that and the other is thousands of years old. But they all just point to evidence of invented recent texts and such going back in history no more than three hundred years. I wondered if this was a motive for the murder as those murdered could have shown it all to be fabricated nonsense that freemasonry has used for about 300 years.
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You cannot attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
