Collapse of steel tower atop WTC 1

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Someone pointed out to me the other day that that cathedral like spire of the WTC 1 core that shortly stood after the tower collapsed just turned to dust and then fell, anyone know anything about this? I've reviewed this several times now and it does look like it just vapourised.

[Stefan]

Sheriton,
I've seen it hundreds of times and I still have NO idea why people say it disintegrates; the "spire" shifts its body width to the right and slightly down, and then falls vertically. Perfectly consistant with being cut at an angle.

[chek]

[Bongo]

agreed Stefan, the column falls vertically downwards. Also with the resolution of the video along with smoke, the spire 'vapourising' is more of an illusion.

It is however an important clue as to the controlled demolition nature of the collapse, as you say, it shifts then falls vertically... it did not topple over.

[Stefan]

Chek,
I don't knwo if I have different eyes in my head to other people. The first time I saw that and every time since my thought was:

"it drops veritically; - it can't drop vertically into the bedrock; that means it was cut someone not far above ground level."

I truly and honestly have never seen the supposed "evaporation", even when people tell me to watch it again with evaporation on my mind- I still see it fall.

So is there something wrong with me? Or am I right and the explanation which fits all the other evidence (the core columns were cut with charges) the right one?

EDIT:

Thanks Bongo, I sometimes feel like I must be mad when everyone else starts talking about evaporation... why is it *I* see it clearly shifting and dropping just like it was cut at an angle??? Glad it's not just me...

[Fallious]

I always thought it fell toward, or away from the camera, so it appeared to be going straight down. Wouldn't rule it out though.

[chek]

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Was there ever an audit of the steel and aluminium salvaged from the WTC? Did the Chinese keep the receipts?

[chek]

[Fred]

If you want to read all about the steel turning to dust, search for plaguepuppy or check out http://janedoe0911.tripod.com for Professor Judy Wood's analysis of it.

http://www.livevideo.com/video/bsregistration/5C356C85FB844741BAA7D32C 892F98AD/star-wars-in-new-york-911-octopus-part-two.aspx

[paul wright]

If you slow down and watch that view frame by frame, it is perfectly clear that the steel in the "spire" doesnt just drop down, but pulverises, turns to dust.
This imitates the way hundreds of bodies, flesh and bone, just vaporised, not mysteriously just shredded into small tissue samples, but completely gone
Much weaker structures than the concrete and steel of course

[Stefan]

I don't see it dh, I see it dropping vertically into a thick cloud of pulverised concrete, gypsum and asbestos. Sorry.

[Micpsi]

[scubadiver]

[SHERITON HOTEL]

Who keeps editing my thread titles? I wrote ''?steel turning to dust?'

[scubadiver]

I didn't think steel COULD turn to dust!

[Andrew Johnson]

[Andrew Johnson]

[chek]

[brian]

The Overwhelming Implausibility of Using Directed Energy Beams to Demolish the World Trade Center

Gregory S. Jenkins

http://www.journalof911studies.com/volume/200702/Implausibility-Direct ed-Energy-Beam-Demolish-WTC-by-Gregory-Jenkins.pdf

[andyb]

Watch Explosive Reality and you will clearly see this spire falling away from numerous camera angles and NOT turning to dust. Anyone who says so is lying, whether knwoingly or unknowingly, but don't let that get in the way of your beliefs.