Shanksville engine planted by a backhoe bucket!

[Killtown]

This is what the perps used the plant the "Flight 93 engine" in the crater:




They brought an old engine scrap in, put it in the backhoe bucket*, simply lowered it down in the crater only a few feet, and backed off the bucket for their quick little engine photo-op:


(*Notice the position of the excavator in that the view of the engine scrap inside the backhoe bucket would be blocked from the people parked on the street which is to the right of this photo. Photo source: http://www.rcfp.org/moussaoui/)


That's why one of the heaviest/strongest parts of the airplane is only a couple of feet underground while we were told that parts of Flight 93 had burrowed down past 40ft.

It's also why this engine scrap looks old and rusted and has none of that "soft dirt" embedded in it after it supposedly
burrowed into the ground at 580mph:




They also threw in a couple of small little shiny non-painted aluminum scraps to help try to make the photo look more realistic:


(Also notice the dirt is dry and not saturated by any fluids from the 5,500 gals of alleged jet fuel on the plane or blood/fluids from the alleged 44 passengers.)

See more at:

http://killtown.blogspot.com/2007/01/planted-engines-at-shanksville.ht ml

(Apparently I've been banned by Abovetopsecret.com over this post.)

[Micpsi]

That is incorrect.

[Micpsi]

No. You were banned for (I quote) "exploiting the critical nature of ATS members by posting controversial theories here, participating minimally in responding to the critical discussion, then discussing his being "attacked" or "censored" on ATS via postings on other safe harbor websites. It appears as though we were being used as a means to build some kind of macho credibility that involved a series of false and insulting accusations directed toward ATS and our members that included "censorship," members as "shills," and everyone "aiding the perps.""

[Killtown]

[John White]

[gruts]

sounds familiar....

http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread286147/pg1

We seem to be among several sites targeted by a recently formed "9/11 Research" group who espouses a particularly provocative theory of "no planes at the WTC" and "TV Fakery."What we (staff and memebrs) have noticed about this group is that their individuals engage in what they hope is an IMPENETRABLE approach in debating. They appear to have have no REAL interest in defending or discussing their theories. Instead they use provocative ideas and inflammatory language ("shills" for example) to bait people into extended debates filled with intentionally frustrating diversions, insults and accusation. Their activity in ATS threads prove they are disinterested in fact, reason, logic, or evidence while attempting to portray themselves as passionately convinced of their own highly questionable positions.