rodin
Validated Poster
Joined: 09 Dec 2006
Posts: 2224
Location: UK
|
 Posted: Sat Jun 23, 2007 3:56 pm Post subject: New info on 911 passengers |
 |
|
http://z10.invisionfree.com/Loose_Change_Forum/index.php?showtopic=724 1
| Quote: | | Items 1-4 suggest that Israel may have had a major role in the 9/11 attacks. Now, we find out that three passengers on United Airlines Flight 93 had connections to Israel. These are not just any three passengers. These are three passengers who fought the terrorists. Also, we find out that four passengers on American Airlines Flight 11 and two passengers on United Airlines Flight 175 were connected to Israel. Thus, we have more evidence of a major Israeli role in the 9/11 attacks. |
Interesting that the gatekeeper that turns up to stick a finger in the Dyke of this still-developing story also pushes the line that 'Pull it' Silverstein was innocent...
One reply says
| Quote: | The entire account of "Todd Beumer's" behavior on FL93 is suspicious.
1. He chose to call a complete stranger instead of his pregnant wife, and chose to talk to her for 45 minutes in an untaped call.
2. He recited a certain prayer with Lisa Jefferson, the stranger he called, although his wife does not recall him knowing that prayer.
3. He supposedly made the call from the same area of the plane as did Tom Burnett, yet the two men apparently were not coordinating with each other their plans for a passenger revolt. Why not?
4. Todd Beumer's call is the only one-- from all four flights-- placing the hijackers still on the plane in the last 10-15 minutes of flight. The only other piece of evidence showing them still on the planes is the Cockpit Voice Recorder from UAL93, which almost everyone agrees was fraudulent.
5. Beumer's phone line was apparently still open long after the plane crashed.
The bottom line is we have no proof that it was really Beumer making that call, or even that he was on UAL93 at all. His phone call lacks the credibility of other calls such as Betty Ong's and Todd Burnett's. Perhaps not coincidentally, those two calls provide evidence damning to the official story, while the call made to Lisa Jefferson from "Todd Beumer" validates the official story in every way. |
another
| Quote: | | Mark Bingham's homosexual partner was a fairly high-level Republican Party official. And Mark's father said exactly what Bush would have wanted him to say after 9/11. |
and
| Quote: | It is public knowledge that flight attendant Betty Ong identified the seat numbers of four of the hijackers on AAL11. She named seats 9A, 9B, 2A and 2B. The authenticity of Ong's call is not in doubt, as we have tapes of some of it. (The rest of the recording mysteriously disappeared.) Her reporting of the seat numbers is not questioned by anyone; it was reported in the Boston Globe.
Seat 9B was assigned to the above-mentioned Daniel Lewin, a former captain in the elite commando unit Seyerat Metkal, who abruptly resigned his post to emigrate to the US at age 27 and, almost magically, overnight, becomes an internet billionaire.
Seat 9A was assigned to Nathan Glazer. Glazer is a Jewish surname. As Hawk has pointed out, Glazer worked for a firm owned by two men with extensive Israeli backgrounds.
Is it possible both Lewin and Glazer were sent their respective careers to transform them into bright-eyed, bushy-tailed "American" businessmen, the kind whom you would never imagine could perform any kind of terrorist attacks?
Seat numbers 2A and 2B were assigned to Waleed and Wail al-Shehri, two Saudi brothers who later turned up alive and well in the Middle East. Who was really sitting in their seats? Perhaps dark-skinned Israeli agents, playing the role of "Arab" hijackers, to fool the passengers into reporting an Arab hijacking in their phone calls and thus frame the Arab world in general?
The fact that an eyewitness identified the seat numbers of two Israel-connected men as hijackers is enough to justify our taking a close look at the Israeli connections of the passengers on the other flights as well. |
My theory
None of the official flights were destroyed. They landed somewhere. Radar signatures were merged to disguise Zakheim's remote control tankers interception of the flight paths. This is why transponders were turned off in the planes.
I thought Flight 93 (or its clone) was meant to hit WTC7 and that the passengers prevented this from happening.
Now I am a little confused. It appears 93 may have been a Hollywood production to manufacture 'evidence' that the hijackings were real. In which case, no passengers ever stormed the cockpit.
????
More thinkey required...
_________________
Belief is the Enemy of Truth www.dissential.com |
|
FAQ
Search
Memberlist
Chat
Usergroups
Calendar
Register
Profile
Log in to check your private messages
Log in
