Angle of WTC impacts, what are the chances of that?

[slimpickins]

Forgive me if this has already been brought up but I've searched the board and other sources and haven't found it mentioned.

Consider these two diagrams of the WTC impacts



(South)



(North)

Look at how similar the angles of impacts are and how the angle matches that of the joins in the wall panels. Passing through the joins meant that the planes penetrated further than they would have otherwise, especially with the north impact where not only did the angle match but they actually hit the joins.

What are the chances of one plane, let alone two, striking the towers at what appears to an optimum angle by chance?

And yet the official history tells a story of very inexperienced pilots, surely not capable of controlling a plane with such accuracy, particularly when the second (north) impact was achieved only after a sharp turn.

Perhaps it was just by chance but it was certainly a fortuitous one from their point of view.

[Wokeman]

I believe that many people in the international 9/11Truth movement accept the fact that there weren't any pilots. (The aircraft were remotely controlled, yes, the technology does exist!) Some others believe there were no planes, but I'm not going down that road!