Buy the DVD or watch the Award Winning documentary about the 9/11 Truth Movement for FREE at:
www.nosmokewithoutfire.co.uk _________________ "Be the change you wish to see in the world"
Ghandi
"True peace is not merely the absence of tension: it is the presence of justice."
Martin Luther King
"Never doubt that a small group of committed people can change the world. Indeed, it is the only thing that ever has"
Margaret Mead
Joined: 05 Oct 2005 Posts: 480 Location: the beano
Posted: Mon Sep 01, 2008 4:48 pm Post subject:
i tried to click on the video link but it didnt work. can you fix it? _________________ "injustice anywhere is a threat to justice everywhere" Martin Luther king
Posted: Tue Sep 02, 2008 6:36 am Post subject: Abuse of laws..
Fascinating to see the apparent abuse of applicable laws. The police were suggesting that the film crew "might be terrorists", then searching one of them quoting section 60 Criminal Justice Act, which seems to only cover suspicion of violent incidents about to happen, see http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts1994/ukpga_19940033_en_7 (section 60 is near the bottom of the page). So their search should have been confined to looking for guns, blades and other sharp objects, not reading cards and information inside wallets.
If they were truly suspecting the film crew of being "terrorists", surely their legal power is contained in s44 of the Terrorism Act 2000? See http://www.opsi.gov.uk/acts/acts2000/ukpga_20000011_en_5 which has to be authorised at Commander level.
It raises the question as to whether or not a Commander authorised this, especially as the plods were quoting a 'violent incident' law. Sections 45(5) and (6) of the TA2003 or s60(10) CJA1994 grants the right to someone who is stopped and searched to obtain a written statement from the police, providing that the application for one is made within 12 months of the search. Would be interesting to find out which reason was being used, and whether or not a Commander had issued such an authorisation (for a search of suspect terrorists). Interesting article about this here http://www.liberty-human-rights.org.uk/issues/6-free-speech/s44-terror ism-act/index.shtml
Doesn't appear to have been any amendments in subsequent years to the above powers, not that I can see, but stand to be corrected.
I think the police, as we move towards a fascist police state, seem to just think that if they mention the word "terrorism" they are authorised to do just what they like!!
You cannot post new topics in this forum You cannot reply to topics in this forum You cannot edit your posts in this forum You cannot delete your posts in this forum You cannot vote in polls in this forum You can attach files in this forum You can download files in this forum