Where did that 1/4 mile high building go?

[gruts]

this is a nearly two year old thread that I thought was worth bumping as it contains some useful information pertaining to recent posts.

I'd also like to ask a couple of questions....

so far all the "evidence" I've seen for space beams destroying the wtc towers concerns the "lack of rubble" (complete bullsh1t), "dustified steel" (complete bullsh1t), "toasted cars" (complete bullsh1t) and hurricane erin (complete bullsh1t).

is that all there is?

or is there some more "evidence" that the space beamers would like to share?

and does anyone who thinks that no planes impacted the twin towers also think that this plane crash was faked?

http://www.911forum.org.uk/board/viewtopic.php?t=15767

[chek]

Heh - seeing your post inspired me to go see what the current state of play was over on shillclown's forum.

It too appears to have been space-beamed leaving no debris behind.

http://forum.911movement.org/index.php?act=idx
"Error 404. The page you are attempting to view does not exist.
And indeed may never have existed".
(I'm using Google Chrome with existential plugin)

Could be another Judy Woodywoodsdewood (did I get that right this time Andrew, huh? Did I? Did I?) courtcase, given time.
It would certainly be pointless enough and guaranteed to fail enough.
As an aside I wonder how things are with Morgan Moneybags these days? What with services rendered and expended when the old statement gets totted up.

Personally I can't wait for "The True and Unleashed Story of Judy Wood And Her Collaborators" to appear, just for the sheer weirdness value.

I'm betting they make Ted Nugent look sane.

[paul wright]

To be perfectly honest, this tiresome reiterationist garbage keeps me away from here - it really does
gruts and chek - your reductionism keeps me offside forever

[gruts]

[gruts]