Biggest Psyop in Human History

[Daniel Elliott]

http://www.richplanet.net/911.php

From what I've seen, more people attack such research than defend. Make of it what you will, but I take my hat off to Richard D. Hall.

[GodSaveTheTeam]

This video is full of speculation. Lots of "probably" "I assume" "as best I could" etc.

A ufo - type object hurtling above NYC and not mentioned once by anyone is probably unlikely. I assume that this theory will be believed by many. I'll try not to dismiss it immediately. As best I can.

[TimmyG]

a load of rubbish

probably a site setup by cia/mi6

ignore

[Daniel Elliott]

Planes just don't add up, Timmy. Perhaps it's best for people to peruse the evidence and make their mind up rather than being advised to ignore.

In any case, I'm interested in your thoughts. Could you point me in the right direction?

[TonyGosling]

It was no planes at the Pentagon not the WTC.
You are mixed up and have become deliberately deluded old chap.

[Daniel Elliott]

Of course Tony. Sorry.

[TimmyG]

ofcourse do your own research..

if you want to think about no-plane theories go ahead..
its my opinion that most of them are instigated and /or encouraged by intelligence services as a diversion. having that stuff out there puts the whole truth comunity in the 'crazy' category.. and for good reason

people saw the planes.. there were planes..
even if they wanted to edit video and photos and distribute it to all the media outlets, and keep this sneakiness covered up.... they could just fly some planes into the towers.

there is nothing funny or unusual about the videos.. they show planes flying into buildings at high speed

the best thing a government can to do to any group it percieves as a potential threat is to infiltrate it and control it in their own way.

this site is either part of a government pysop or the guy just wants to be a celeb and make money... i mean just look at it. it's amazing

[Daniel Elliott]

Hi Timmy,

We'll get there in the end between us. I think you hit the nail on the head with your last comment.

All the best.

[SHERITON HOTEL]

I'd call myself a 'plane agnostic' re. the WTC. 'No planers' have a point when they question how 1/13th inch thick aluminium wings could,without resistance or defraction, sever structural steel box beams and the best part of an acre of steel reinforced concrete! If what hit WTC2 REALLY was a commercial jet it would follow we could replace DU tipped bunker busters with hollow aluminium plastic tipped tubes fired at sub sonic speeds, someone tell the chancellor! no need to take away the pensioners fuel allowance to plug the deficit.
I question where Richard D Hall is coming from with his "anti gravity sphere hit the south tower 911" it would still be subject to Newton's 3rd law of motion/equal and opposite reaction,and what was he doing working on the Trident missile programme?. "Plane hugger" is a very provocative term imho.